Abstract
The performance of load balancing algorithms in HetNets is investigated in this paper. We performed a comparative analysis of three load balancing algorithms, including our previously proposed algorithm based on local optimization. We evaluated the offloading capabilities, fairness of the distribution of the load across base stations and spectral efficiency gains in the downlink. As opposed to previous studies were the evaluation of such algorithms was carried out under static conditions, in this study we performed the analysis in a dynamic and more realistic scenario. We quantified the effects of user mobility and the triggering of handovers during the load balancing process on the gains provided by the algorithms. We were able to show that the resulting gains in spectral efficiency after balancing the load are not as high as previously reported under static conditions. Our study shows that user mobility does affect the benefits of load balancing algorithms, particularly in the case of iterative algorithms. However, balancing the load in a HetNet still leads to faster downlink data rates, up to 80% gain for cell edge users was achieved according to our study. Our results show that our load balancing algorithm was able to provide similar benefits compared to the other two algorithms, however our approach is substantially less complex. Additionally, our load balancing algorithm was superior in terms of its practicality due to a minimum level of coordination and exchange of information among base stations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, J. G., Singh, S., Ye, Q., Lin, X., & Dhillon, H. S. (2014). An overview of load balancing in hetnets: Old myths and open problems. IEEE Wireless Communications, 21(2), 18–25.
Ye, Q., Rong, B., Chen, Y., Al-Shalash, M., Caramanis, C., & Andrews, J. G. (2013). User association for load balancing in heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(6), 2706–2716.
Shen, K., & Wei, Y. (2014). Distributed pricing-based user association for downlink heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6), 1100–1113.
Castro-Hernandez, D., & Paranjape, R. (2015). A distributed load balancing algorithm for LTE/LTE-A heterogeneous networks. In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference workshops (pp. 380–385). IEEE.
Castro-Hernandez, D., & Paranjape, R. (2015). Comparative analysis of load balancing algorithms for LTE/LTE-A Hetnets. In IEEE 2015 international conference on wireless communication, vehicular technology, information theory and aerospace and electronic systems technology (Wireless VITAE). IEEE.
Mishra, S., Sengupta, A., & Murthy, S. R. (2013). Enhancing the performance of HetNets via linear regression estimation of Range Expansion Bias. In IEEE international conference on networks (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Siomina, I., & Yuan, D. (2012). Load balancing in heterogeneous LTE: Range optimization via cell offset and load-coupling characterization. In IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 1357–1361). IEEE.
Tian, P., Tian, H., Zhu, J., Chen, L., & She, X. (2011). An adaptive bias configuration strategy for Range Extension in LTE-advanced heterogeneous networks. In IET international conference on communication technology and application (pp. 336–340). IET.
Kikuchi, K., & Otsuka, H. (2012). Proposal of adaptive control CRE in heterogeneous networks. In IEEE international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (pp. 910–914). IEEE.
Yasir, B. A., Su, G., & Bachache, N. (2012). Range expansion for pico cell in heterogeneous LTE-A cellular networks. In IEEE international conference on computer science and network technology (pp. 1235–1240). IEEE.
Sun, Y., Deng, T., Fang, Y., Wang, M., & Wu, Y. (2013). A method for pico-specific upper bound CRE bias setting in HetNet. In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference workshops (WCNCW) (pp. 80–84). IEEE.
Ronoh, K., & Mengistie, A. (2012). Load balancing in heterogeneous LTE-A networks. Doctoral dissertation. Linkoping University.
Lopez-Perez, D., Guvenc, I., & Chu, X. (2012). Mobility management challenges in 3GPP heterogeneous networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(12), 70–78.
Kiran, S. (2013). Proportional Fairness in LTE-advanced heterogeneous networks with eICIC. In Vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall) (pp. 1–6).
Kawser, M., Hamid, N. I. B., Hasan, N., Alam, S., & Rahman, M. (2012). Downlink SNR to CQI mapping for different multiple antenna techniques in LTE. International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering, 2(5), 756–760.
3GPP. (2011). TS 36.902: Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); Self-Configuring and Self-Optimizing Network (SON) Use Cases and Solutions. Technical report, 3GPP.
Liu, D., Wang, L., Chen, Y., Elkashlan, M., Wong, K.-K., Schober, R., et al. (2016). User association in 5G networks: A survey and an outlook. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(2), 1018–1044.
Castro-Hernandez, D., & Paranjape, R. (2016). Local tuning of a site-specific propagation path loss model for microcell environments. Journal on Wireless Personal Communications, 91(2), 709–728.
Castro-Hernandez, D., & Paranjape, R. (2016). Walk test simulator for LTE/LTE-A network planning. In IEEE international telecommunications network strategy and planning symposium (NETWORKS) (pp. 56–61). IEEE.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank SaskTel Inc. and the University of Regina for collaborating in the development of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castro-Hernandez, D., Paranjape, R. Dynamic Analysis of Load Balancing Algorithms in LTE/LTE-A HetNets. Wireless Pers Commun 96, 3297–3315 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4089-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4089-3