Skip to main content
Log in

Novel Algorithm for Tracking LEO Satellites Using Doppler Frequency Shift Technique

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication between satellite and ground station requires the antenna to be directly towards satellite for telemetery and telecommand data exchange. Hence, role of satellite tracking is clear. There are various techniques for satellite tracking. In this paper, Doppler technique for tracking LEO satellites from a ground station is discussed. This technique is a precise, beneficial and easy method compared with others. First, Doppler shift is obtained using TLE and equations governing on satellites and their orbit. Then this Doppler shift is compared with an obtained Doppler shift called practical Doppler shift which is obtained via a radio receiver at the ground station. This comparison leads to a tracking error which is removed in control loop by auto tracking process. Hence tracking angles are created with no error leading to a precise satellite tracking. This method acts as software in the loop which performs the act of satellite tracking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. San Luis, O. (2013). The feasibility and application of observing small LEO satellites with amateur telescopes. M.S. thesis, Department of Electronic Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, California, USA.

  2. Wells, D. E. (1971). Orbital information from the U.S. Navy navigation satellite system. Dartmouth: Bedford Institute of Oceanography.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gross, J. E. Preprocessing electronic satellite observations. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science, Report No. 100, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, March 1968.

  4. Hawkins, G. J., Edwards, D. J., & McGeehan, J. P. (1988) Tracking systems for satellite communications. Radar and Signal Processing, IEE Proceedings F. Vol. 135. No. 5. IET.

  5. Sherman, S. M., & Barton, D. K. (2011). Monopulse principles and techniques. Norwood: Artech House.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cho, C. H., et al. (2003). Antenna control system using step tracking algorithm with H∞ controller. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 1(1), 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Advantech wireless antenna controllers. Trade catalogues, United States, 2010.

  8. Guier, W. H., & Weiffenbach, G. C. (1960). A satellite Doppler navigation system. Proceedings of the IRE, 48(4), 507–516.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Nasirian, M. (2011). Principles of satellites educational course booklet. Tehran: Malek Ashtar University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Culter, J. W., & Kitts, C. A. (2002). Mercury: A satellite ground station control system. Stanford: Space Systems Development Laboratory, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gawronski, W. (2002). Single-loop antenna control, IPN Progress Report 42–151, USA.

  12. Singh, R. H., Reddy, B. R., & Rao, B. C. S. (2013). Design and implementation of antenna control servo system for satellite ground station. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, 4(4), 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tabaković, Ž. (2000). Doppler effect in non-GSO satellite propagation. In: Millennium Conference on Antennas and Propagation-IEEE AP-2000. Hrvatska znanstvena bibliografija i MZOS-Svibor.

  14. Klinkert, I. (2010). Satellite orbit determination with the global educational network for satellite operations (GENSO),” M.S. thesis, Department of Electronic Engineering, Open universiteit, Netherlands.

  15. Daum, P. (2005). A satellite footprint visualisation tool. M.S. thesis, Department of Communication Systems, Lancaster University, Germany, 2005.

  16. Nasirian, M., Taghi zade, A. (2013). Identifying satellite downlink precisely using a local predictive satellite simulator in UHF-VHF band, Space Sciences Journal. Tehran, Iran, Number 4, 2013.

  17. Ali, I., Bonanni, P. G., & Al-Dhahir, N. (2001). Doppler applications in LEO satellite communication systems (Vol. 656). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, J., Lim, J., & Kim, E. (2016). Comparison between multimode-monopulse and step-tracking techniques for a UAV satellite terminal. In: Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS), 2016, (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  19. Nasrollahnejad, M. B., Nowdeh, S. A., Mokhtari, Y., & Moharlooei, P. (2012). LEO satellite tracking using monopulse. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 11(6), 723–726.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burkhard, Richard K. (1985). Geodesy for the Layman. Washington, D.C: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Ghanbarisabagh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rouzegar, H., Nasirian, M. & Ghanbarisabagh, M. Novel Algorithm for Tracking LEO Satellites Using Doppler Frequency Shift Technique. Wireless Pers Commun 96, 2161–2178 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4291-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4291-3

Keywords

Navigation