Skip to main content
Log in

Complex Network Modeling and Evolutionary Game Simulation of the Arctic Environmental Emergency Response and Governance

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change provides opportunities in the surrounding areas of North Pole to commercial shipping activities, but which also poses risks to ship strikes, oil spills, chronic marine environmental pollution, etc. However, the public product supply of Arctic environmental emergency response and governance is seriously insufficient. As such, a collective and effective system should be established to protect the Arctic environment. In the present paper, a complex network model of Arctic environmental emergency response and governance system is developed. The strategy of each country in the complex network is demonstrated by evolutionary game simulations of this system model. Computational results indicate that the benefit of environmental emergency response and governance affects the cooperation strategy of each country. Moreover, Long-term benefit and return intensity are the key parameters of environmental emergency response and governance benefit. These findings extend theoretical research in the sustainable development Arctic routes and provide reference for the participation of other countries beyond the Arctic Council.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wei, L. X., & Zhang, Z. Z. (2007). Analysis of Arctic Sea Ice variability. Marine Forecasts, 24(4), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, L. J. (2007). Arctic sovereignty dispute Trend. Contemporary International Relations, 216(10), 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, H. R., Chen, Y. T., & Dong, Y. (2011). Analysis and prospects of legal path in Arctic environmental governance. Journal of Ocean University of China (Social Sciences Edition), 112(2), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ding, H., & Zhao, N. N. (2014). The Arctic governance and China’s participation—an analysis based on the theory of international public goods. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 67(3), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaturvedi, S. (1996). The polar regions: A political geography. International Affairs, 73(3), 581.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, Z. F., Yan, L., Xu, M. Q., et al. (2013). Navigation environment assessment of Arctic routes. Computer Engineering and Applications, 49(1), 249–253.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Knol, M., & Arbo, P. (2014). Oil spill response in the Arctic: Norwegian experiences and future perspectives. Marine Policy, 50, 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dawson, J., Johnston, M. E., & Stewart, E. J. (2014). Governance of arctic expedition cruise ships in a time of rapid environmental and economic change. Ocean and Coastal Management, 89(2), 88–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaiser, B. A., Bakanev, S., Bertelsen, R. G., et al. (2015). Spatial issues in Arctic marine resource governance workshop summary and comment. Marine Policy, 58, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gamberg, M., Chételat, J., Poulain, A. J., et al. (2015). Mercury in the Canadian Arctic terrestrial environment: an update. Science of the Total Environment, 5(509–510), 28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wegge, N. (2015). The emerging politics of the Arctic Ocean. future management of the living marine resources. Marine Policy, 51, 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Doel, R. E., Wråkberg, U., & Zeller, S. (2014). Science, environment, and the new arctic. Journal of Historical Geography, 44(3), 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, H. J. (2015). Success in heading north? South Korea’s master plan for Arctic policy. Marine Policy, 61, 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng, J., Chen, B., Thanyamanta, W., et al. (2016). Offshore produced water management: a review of current practice and challenges in harsh/arctic environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 104(1–2), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pérez, E. C., & Yaneva, Z. V. (2016). The European arctic policy in progress. Polar Science, 10(3), 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yi, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, Y., et al. (2015). Small-world topology can significantly improve the performance of noisy consensus in a complex network. Computer Journal, 58(12), 3242–3254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao, W., Li, M., & Chen, G. (2017). Small-world features of real-world networks[J]. Journal of Communications & Networks, 19(3), 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, C., Gao, X. L., Hu, J., et al. (2013). Effects of donation-diversity in public goods game on complex networks. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 45(5), 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 61473053). We also would like to show appreciation to the anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaodan Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, H., Jiang, X., Li, C. et al. Complex Network Modeling and Evolutionary Game Simulation of the Arctic Environmental Emergency Response and Governance. Wireless Pers Commun 102, 951–961 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5118-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5118-y

Keywords

Navigation