Skip to main content
Log in

A Study on the Influence of Non-intelligence Factors on College Students’ English Learning Achievement Based on C4.5 Algorithm of Decision Tree

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In college students’ English learning, it is undeniable that non intelligence factors can significantly influence their English learning achievement. This paper studies the influence of non intelligence factors on English learning achievement of college students. Decision tree algorithm is used to construct decision tree for factors influencing of college students’ English learning, which is further modified through C4.5 algorithm according to the actual situation, and the non intelligence factors influencing college English learning achievement are obtained. Finally, the conclusion is further tested, and the test results indicate that the prediction rule can accurately predict the English learning achievement of average students and underachievers. Therefore, the proposed algorithm can be used as a good predictor for students with average or poor English learning achievement and meet the requirement of teaching assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haney, B. D. (2015). Assessing organizational readiness for E-learning: 70 questions to ask. Performance Improvement, 41(4), 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sandhawalia, B. S., & Dalcher, D. (2015). Dynamic knowledge support model for decision-making and sustainable growth: An empirical study. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(5), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Labib, S., Williams, A., Guo, C. H., et al. (2016). Comparative transcriptomic analyses to scrutinize the assumption that genotoxic PAHs exert effects via a common mode of action. Archives of Toxicology, 90(10), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dryer, R., Henning, M. A., Tyson, G. A., et al. (2016). Academic achievement performance of university students with disability: Exploring the influence of non-academic factors. International Journal of Disability Development & Education, 63(4), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hegedus, S. J., Tapper, J., & Dalton, S. (2016). Exploring how teacher-related factors relate to student achievement in learning advanced algebra in technology-enhanced classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho, H. (2016). Relationship between college students’ English learning beliefs and their English achievement in e-learning. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(11), 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, X. (2017). Dynamic assessment in english pronunciation teaching: From the perspective of intellectual factors. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 7(9), 780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Research on English teaching combining Ubiquitous Learning and Micro-class (Grant No. JXJG-16-80-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M. A Study on the Influence of Non-intelligence Factors on College Students’ English Learning Achievement Based on C4.5 Algorithm of Decision Tree. Wireless Pers Commun 102, 1213–1222 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5177-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5177-0

Keywords

Navigation