Skip to main content
Log in

A New Incentive Policy for Improving Data Service in P2P Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When each peer provides data transmission, storage and other related services for other in Peer-to-peer networks, the basic requirement is to ensure that the system has good robustness and availability. Specific to the different practical needs, it’s also to ensure that the system has scalable. In the Mirror Incentive Policy, the system would lose robustness at the low proportion of reciprocators. In this paper, we propose a new incentive policy called Wise Incentive Policy. In the Wise Incentive Policy, the system can achieve the robustness, even if the proportion of defectors is high at the beginning. Simulation experiments verify the validity of the proposed method in peer-to-peer networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Awiphan, S., Su, Z., & Katto, J. (2013). Service differentiation based incentive mechanism for p2p streaming in hybrid overlay network. ITE Transactions on Media Technology & Applications, 1(2), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao, B. Q., Lui, J. C. S., & Chiu, D. M. (2012). A mathematical framework for analyzing adaptive incentive protocols in p2p networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 20(2), 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karakaya, M., Korpeoglu, I., & Uluso, Özgür. (2008). Free riding in peer-to-peer networks. Computer Networks, 52(3), 675–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Golle, P., Leytonbrown, K., & Mironov, I. (2001). Incentives for sharing in peer-to-peer networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6(2), 264–267.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Silva, B. M. C., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Kumar, N., & Han, G. (2015). Cooperative strategies for challenged networks and applications: a survey. IEEE Systems Journal, 99, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cui, G., Li, M., Wang, Z., Ren, J., Jiao, D., & Ma, J. (2015). Analysis and evaluation of incentive mechanisms in p2p networks: a spatial evolutionary game theory perspective. Concurrency & Computation Practice & Experience, 27(12), 3044–3064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aslani, R., Hakami, V., & Dehghan, M. (2017). A token-based incentive mechanism for video streaming applications in peer-to-peer networks. Multimedia Tools & Applications, 5, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Awiphan, S., Su, Z., & Katto, J. (2013). Service differentiation based incentive mechanism for p2p streaming in hybrid overlay network. ITE Transactions on Media Technology & Applications, 1(2), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, D., Kwok, Y. K., Jin, X., & Deng, J. (2016). A performance study of incentive schemes in peer-to-peer file-sharing systems. Journal of Supercomputing, 72(3), 1152–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiang, Z., & Iamnitchi, A. (2016). A survey of socially aware peer-to-peer systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 49(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kurdi, H. A. (2015). Honestpeer: an enhanced eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p systems. Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences, 27(3), 315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta, R., & Singh, Y. N. (2013). Trust estimation in peer-to-peer network using blue. Computer Science, 21(1), 103–105.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Rui, L., Pan, Z., Huang, H., & Qiu, X. (2016). Reputation-based incentive mechanisms in crowdsourcing. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 07, 1808–1815.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Palomar, E., Alcaide, A., Ribagorda, A., & Zhang, Y. (2012). The peer’s dilemma: a general framework to examine cooperation in pure peer-to-peer systems. Computer Networks, 56(17), 3756–3766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, Chuang, Zhao, Honglin, & Jia, Min. (2015). Game Theoretic Analysis for Pricing-based Incentive Mechanism in Non-dedicated Cooperative Relay Networks. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 22(10), 3977–3989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuchesfehani, E. K., & Zaccour, G. (2016). Incentive equilibrium strategies in dynamic games played over event trees. Automatica, 71, 50–56.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. ChunMei, G. U. I., Qiang, J. I. A. N., HuaiMin, W. A. N. G., & QuanYuan, W. U. (2010). Repeated game theory based penalty-incentive mechanism in internet-based virtual computing environment. Journal of Software, 21(12), 3042–3055.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lu, K., Wang, S., Xie, L., Wang, Z., & Li, M. (2016). A dynamic reward-based incentive mechanism: reducing the cost of p2p systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 112, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393(6685), 573–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 6137006, National Social Science Foundation Under Grant No. 16BGL181 and Shandong Spark Program under Grant No. 2013XH17004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qicong Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Zhu, L. & Yang, X. A New Incentive Policy for Improving Data Service in P2P Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 103, 231–245 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5438-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5438-6

Keywords

Navigation