Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An Optimal Trust Aware Cluster Based Routing Protocol Using Fuzzy Based Trust Inference Model and Improved Evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization in WBANs

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wireless body sensor network (WBSN) an extensive of WSN is in charge for the detection of patient’s health concerned data. This monitored health data are essential to be routed to the sink (base station) in an effective way by approaching the routing technique. Routing of tremendous sensed data to the base station minimizes the life time of the network due to heavy traffic occurrence. The major concern of this work is to increase the lifespan of the network which is considered as a serious problem in the wireless network functionalities. In order to recover this issue, we propose an optimal trust aware cluster based routing technique in WBSN. The human body enforced for the detection of health status is assembled with sensor nodes. In this paper, three novel schemes namely, improved evolutionary particle swarm optimization (IEPSO), fuzzy based trust inference model, and self-adaptive greedy buffer allocation and scheduling algorithm (SGBAS) are proposed for the secured transmission of data. The sensor nodes are gathered to form a cluster and from the cluster, it is necessary to select the cluster head (CH) for the effective transmission of data to nearby nodes without accumulation. The CH is chosen by considering IEPSO algorithm. For securable routing, we exhibit fuzzy based trust inference model to select the trusted path. Finally, to reduce traffic occurrence in the network, we introduce SGBAS algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method attains better results when compared with conventional clustering protocols and in terms of some distinctive QoS determinant parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kulkarni, R. V., et al. (2011). Particle swarm optimization in wireless-sensor networks: A brief survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 41(2), 262–267.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradai, N., Fourati, L. C., & Kamoun, L. (2015). WBAN data scheduling and aggregation under WBAN/WLAN healthcare network. Ad Hoc Networks, 25, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Janabi, S., Al-Shourbaji, I., Shojafar, M., & Shamshirband, S. (2017). Survey of main challenges (security and privacy) in wireless body area networks for healthcare applications. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 18(2), 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless micro sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (Vol. 2).

  5. He, Y., Zhu, W., & Guan, L. (2011). Optimal resource allocation for pervasive health monitoring systems with body sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 10(11), 1558–1575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thotahewa, K., Khan, J., & Yuce, M. (2014). Power efficient ultra wide band based wireless body area networks with narrowband feedback path. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 13(8), 1829–1842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma, S., & Jena, S. (2015). Cluster based multipath routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 45(2), 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sundararaj, V. (2016). An efficient threshold prediction scheme for wavelet based ECG signal noise reduction using variable step size firefly algorithm. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering System, 9(3), 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arboleda, L. M., & Nasser, N. (2006). Comparison of clustering algorithms and protocols for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE conference on electrical and computer engineering (pp. 1787–92).

  10. Tyagi, S., Gupta, S., Tanwar, S., & Kumar, N. (2013). Ehe-leach: Enhanced heterogeneous leach protocol for life time enhancement of wireless SNs. In 2013 international conference on advances in computing, communications and informatics (ICACCI) (pp. 1485–1490).

  11. Kumar, D. (2014). Performance analysis of energy efficient clustering protocols for maximizing lifetime of wireless sensor networks. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 4, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bader, A., Abed-Meraim, K., & Alouini, M. (2012). An efficient multi-carrier position-based packet forwarding protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 11(1), 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Y., Huang, D., Ji, M., & Xie, F. (2013). The evolution game analysis of clustering for asymmetrical multi-factors in WSNs. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 39(6), 1746–1757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jin, R., Gao, T., Song, J., Zou, J., & Wang, L. (2013). Passive cluster-based multipath routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 19(8), 1851–1866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Du, T., Qu, S., Liu, F., & Wang, Q. (2015). An energy efficiency semi-static routing algorithm for WSNs based on HAC clustering method. Information Fusion, 21, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahajan, S., Malhotra, J., & Sharma, S. (2014). An energy balanced QoS based cluster head selection strategy for WSN. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 15(3), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu, D., Bao, L., & Liu, C. H. (2013). Scalable channel allocation and access scheduling for wireless internet-of-things. IEEE Sensors Journal, 13(10), 3596–3604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, D., Bao, L., Regan, A. C., & Talcott, C. L. (2013). Large-scale access scheduling in wireless mesh networks using social centrality. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 73(8), 1049–1065.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rezaee, A. A., & Pasandideh, F. (2018). A fuzzy congestion control protocol based on active queue management in wireless sensor networks with medical applications. Wireless Personal Communications, 98(1), 815–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang, C., Shi, W., Xiang, M., & Tang, X. (2010). Energy-balanced unequal clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 17(4), 94–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Latiff, N., Tsimenidis, C., & Sharif, B. (2007). Energy-aware clustering for wireless sensor networks using particle swarm optimization. In IEEE 18th international conference on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMR C’07) (pp. 1–5).

  22. Ren, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, K., & Shen, X. (2016). Adaptive and channel-aware detection of selective forwarding attacks in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(5), 3718–3731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdul Latiff, N., Tsimenidis, C., & Sharif, B. (2007). Performance comparison of optimization algorithms for clustering in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE international conference on mobile adhoc and sensor systems (pp. 1–4).

  24. Rahmanian, A., Omranpour, H., Akbari, M., & Raahemifar, K. (2011). A novel genetic algorithm in leach-c routing protocol for sensor networks. In 24th Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering (CCECE) (pp. 001096–001100).

  25. Hacioglu, G., Kand, V., & Sesli, E. (2016). Multi objective clustering for wireless sensor networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 59, 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khalil, E. A., & Attea, B. A. (2011). Energy-aware evolutionary routing protocol for dynamic clustering of wireless sensor networks. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 1(4), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Djenouri, D., & Balasingham, I. (2009). New QoS and geographical routing in wireless biomedical sensor networks. In 6th international conference on broadband communications, networks, and systems (pp. 1–8).

  28. Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless micro sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1, 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sivaji College of Engineering and Technology, Nagercoil, Tamilnadu, India

    R. A. Isabel

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Marian Engineering College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India

    E. Baburaj

Authors
  1. R. A. Isabel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Baburaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. A. Isabel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Isabel, R.A., Baburaj, E. An Optimal Trust Aware Cluster Based Routing Protocol Using Fuzzy Based Trust Inference Model and Improved Evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization in WBANs. Wireless Pers Commun 101, 201–222 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5683-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5683-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation