Skip to main content
Log in

Extending Throughput Performance for Low SNR Scenarios in WLANs Using Two-Level Frames Aggregation with Enhanced A-MSDU

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

IEEE 802.11n standard is deployed virtually everywhere: on residences, offices, university campuses, and even market places. However, throughput obtained by end users have not measured up to the speed range of between 100 and 600 Mbps stipulated in the standard due to the Physical (PHY) technology involved and timing headers at the Media access control (MAC). To overcome this, two frames aggregation schemes, namely, A-MSDU and A-MPDU were introduced as a means of utilizing channel efficiency at the MAC through amortization of the overheads over multiple frames. However, there are still issues with additional headers from aggregating frames. We know that A-MSDU performs well in clear channels and small aggregation sizes but poorly with increasing channel error and larger aggregation sizes, while the opposite is true for A-MPDU. Thus, several authors exploited their complimentary efficiencies to derive two-level aggregation schemes, resulting in higher throughput, headers reduction, and channel utilization. However, these gains are totally eroded at SNR of 19 dB and below. Using NS3 discrete event simulator, we therefore propose a two-level frame aggregation scheme that utilizes the enhanced A-MSDU and A-MPDU, using appropriate algorithm depending on the SNR value. Our work increased the SNR range for throughput performance by 37.5%; increased channel utilization by 40%, 36%, and 31% at SNR variants of 19 dB, 17 dB, and 16 dB respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IEEE Standard for Information Technology. (2009). Part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. Amendment 5: Enhancements for higher throughput. IEEE Std 802.11n.

  2. Kolap, J., Krishnan, S., & Shaha, N. (2012). Frame aggregation in IEEE 802.11n WLAN. International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks, 4(3), 141–53.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Forouzan, B. A. (2007). Data communication and networking. New York: Mc Graw Hill International edition.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Skordoulis, D., Ni, Q., Chen, H., Stephens, A. P., Liu, C., & Jamalipour, A. (2008). IEEE 802.11n MAC frame aggregation mechanisms for next-generation high-throughput WLANs. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15(1), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, C., & Wei, H. (2009). IEEE 802.11n MAC enhancement and performance evaluation. Mobile Networks and Applications, 14(6), 760–771.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ginzburg, B., & Kesselman, A. (2007). Performance analysis of A-MPDU and AMSDU aggregation in IEEE 802.11n. In Sarnoff symposium (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SARNOF.2007.4567389.

  7. Kim, Y., Monroy, E., Lee, O., Park, K. J., & Choi, S. (2012). Adaptive two-level frame aggregation in IEEE 802.11n WLAN. In Asia–Pacific conference on communications (APCC) (pp. 658–663). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/APCC.2012.6388276.

  8. IEEE Std 802.11TM-2012. (2012). Part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications: Enhancements for higher throughput. Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng, H., Chen, G., & Yu, L. (2010). Video transmission over IEEE 802.11n WLAN with adaptive aggregation scheme. In Broadband multimedia systems and broadcasting (BMSB) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBMSB.2010.5463104.

  10. Lin, Y., & Wong, V. W. S. (2006). Frame aggregation and optimal frame size adaptation for IEEE 802.11n WLANs. In Proceedings of global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM 2006) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2006.925.

  11. Maqhat, B., Baba, M. D., & Rahman, R. A. (2012). A-MSDU real time traffic scheduler for IEEE802.11n WLANs. In Wireless technology and applications (ISWTA) (pp. 286–290). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWTA.2012.6373863.

  12. Jeon, S., & Lee, J. (2011). Adaptive frame aggregation scheme for energy efficiency in WLAN. In International conference on consumer electronics (ICCE) (pp. 463–464). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2011.5722685.

  13. Tenanbaum, A. S., & Wetheral, D. J. (2011). The medium access control sublayer. Computer Networks (5th ed., pp. 303–312). New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Noma, A., Othman, M., Lun, K. Y., & Ahmad, I. (2015). Two-level frames aggregation with enhanced A-MSDU for IEEE 802.11n WLANs. Wireless Personal Communication, 82(3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. IEEE Standard for Information Technology. (2013). Part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. Amendment 4: Enhancements for very high throughput for operation in bands below 6 GHz. IEEE Std 802.11ac/D5.0.

  16. IEEE Standard for Information Technology. (2012). Part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. Amendment 3: Enhancements for very high throughput in the 60 GHz band. IEEE Std 802.11ad/D9.0.

  17. Ginzburg, B., & Kesselman, A. (2017). Performance analysis of A-MPDU and A-MSDU aggregation in IEEE 802.11n. In IEEE Sarnoff symposium, New York, USA (p. 1C5).

  18. Qi, P., & Guo, R. (2013). An adaptive frame length two-level frame aggregation method in 802.11n. Electronic Design Engineering, 21(4), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, T., Ni, Q., Malone, D., Leith, D., Xiao, Y., & Turletti, T. (2009). Aggregation with fragment retransmission for very high-speed WLANs. IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking, 17(2), 591–604.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gast, M. (2012). 802.11n: A survival guide. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Selvam, T., & Srikanth, S. (2010). A frame aggregation scheduler for IEEE 802.11n. In National conference on communication (NCC) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/NCC.2010.5430156.

  22. Feng, K. T., & Lin, P. T. (2009). Frame-aggregated link adaptation algorithm for IEEE 802.11n networks. In Personal indoor and mobile radio communications, Tokyo (pp. 42–46).

  23. Kim, Y., Monroy, E., & Lee, O. (2015). Adaptive two-level frame aggregation for fairness and efficiency in IEEE 802.11n wireless LANs. Mobile Information Systems, 2015, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/548109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saif, A., Othman, M., Subramaniam, S. K., & Abdul-Hamid, N. A. W. (2012). An enhanced A-MSDU frame aggregation scheme for 802.11n wireless networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 66(4), 683–706.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Saif, A., & Othman, M. (2013). SRA-MSDU: Enhanced A-MSDU frame aggregation with selective retransmission in 802.11 n wireless networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36(4), 1219–1229.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Saif, A., Othman, M., Subramaniam, S. K., & Abdul-Hamid, N. A. W. (2012). An optimized A-MSDU frame aggregation with subframe retransmission in IEEE 802.11n wireless networks. In International conference on computational science, Omaha (pp. 812–821).

  27. Pefkianakis, I., Hu, Y., Wong, S. H., Yang, H., & Lu, S. (2010). MIMO rate adaptation in 802.11n wireless networks. In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, Chicago (pp. 257–268).

  28. Liu, J., Yao, M., & Qiu, Z. (2015). Enhanced BlockACK method for A-MPDU transmission in IEEE 802.11 n/ac/ad WLANs. Electronics Letters, 19(12), 159–161.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Charfi, E., Chaari, L., & Kamoun, L. (2012). Upcoming WLANs MAC access mechanisms: An overview. In 8th IET international symposium on communication systems, networks and signal processing (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNDSP.2012.6292711.

  30. Hajlaoui, N., Jabri, I., & Ben Jemaa, M. (2018). An accurate two dimensional Markov chain model for IEEE 802.11n DCF. Wireless Networks, 24, 1019–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zielinski, B. (2011). Efficiency analysis of IEEE 802.11 protocol with block acknowledgement and frame aggregation. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, 59(2), 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lee, W. H., & Hwang, H. Y. (2019). A-MPDU aggregation with optimal number of MPDUs for delay requirements in IEEE 802.11ac. PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Byeon, S., Yoon, K., Yang, C., & Choi, S. (2017). STRALE: Mobility-aware PHY rate and frame aggregation length adaptation in WLANs. In IEEE conference on computer communications, (INFOCOM 2017) (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2017.8056965.

  34. Das, S., Kar, P., & Barman, S. (2017). Analysis of IEEE 802.11 WLAN frame aggregation under different network conditions. In International conference on wireless communications, signal processing and networking (WiSPNET) (pp. 1240–1245). https://doi.org/10.1109/wispnet.2017.8299961.

  35. Inamullah, M., & Raman, B. (2019). 802.11ac frame aggregation is bottlenecked. In Proceedings of the 22nd international ACM conference on modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems—(MSWIM) (pp. 45–49). https://doi.org/10.1145/3345768.3355936.

  36. Yazid, M., & Ksentini, A. (2018). Modeling and performance analysis of the main MAC and PHY features of the 802.11ac standard: A-MPDU aggregation vs spatial multiplexing. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(11), 10243–10257. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2018.2870127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sorra, F., Othman, M., Hakim, F., Alrshah, M., Abdullah, M., & Saif, A. (2019). Two-level frame aggregation scheme under unreliable channel conditions for IEEE 802.11n WLANs: A survey. In First international conference of intelligent computing and engineering (ICOICE) (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1109/icoice48418.2019.9035181.

  38. Liu, J., Yao, M., & Qiu, Z. (2018). Adaptive A-MPDU retransmission scheme with two-level frame aggregation compensation for IEEE 802.11n/ac/ad WLANs. Wireless Networks, 24, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chosokabe, Y., Uwai, T., Nagao, Y., Lanante, L., & Ochi, H. (2015). Adaptive two-level frame aggregation in IEEE 802.11n WLAN. In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference workshops (WCNCW). https://doi.org/10.1109/wcncw.2015.7122546.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank everyone who provided support to improve the content of this paper. This work is supported in part by the Nigeria Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND/ES/AST&D/UNIV/UYO/VOL.I) through Akwa Ibom State University. This research work is also partially supported by the Malaysian Ministry of Education, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Putra Grant with High Impact Factor. Grant No. UPM/700-2/1/GPB/2017/9557900.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aloysius Chris Akpanobong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akpanobong, A.C., Othman, M. & Ansa, G.O. Extending Throughput Performance for Low SNR Scenarios in WLANs Using Two-Level Frames Aggregation with Enhanced A-MSDU. Wireless Pers Commun 115, 1695–1710 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07650-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07650-2

Keywords

Navigation