Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of Prognosis in Emergency Trauma Patients with Optimal Limit Gradient Based on Grid Search Optimal Parameters

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposes an innovative use of optimized extreme gradient enhancement based on grid search best parameters (Extreme Gradient Boosting, XGBoost) machine learning analyzer evaluates the prognostic state of emergency patients with severe trauma, with two prognostic outcomes, including rehabilitation and death. For patients with a trauma severity score (Injury Severity Score, ISS) greater than 15 in the ISS category of “serious trauma”, the use of XGBoost collects 3 parts of data into a database through emergency trauma patients to the prognostic result analysis, respectively, for hospitalization injury data, physician evaluation data, physician disposal data, and analysis prognotation status. After experimenting with the results of different methods, data attributes and predictive prognosis systems use the XGBoost method with a higher accuracy rate, thus achieving the goal of cost studies, so that medical personnel can learn about some vital signs and trauma scores and other data, you can estimate the prognostic status of patients, better treat emergency trauma patients, improve the probability of prognosis rehabilitation and reduce the risk of fatal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, M., Hao, Y., Hwang, K., Wang, L., & Wang, L. (2017). Disease prediction by machine learning over big data from healthcare communities. IEEE Access, 5, 8869–8879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Panayides, A. S., Pattichis, M. S., Leandrou, S., Pitris, C., Constantinidou, A., & Pattichis, C. S. (2019). Radiogenomics for precision medicine with a big data analytics perspective. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 23(5), 2063–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feng, M., et al. (2019). Big data analytics and mining for effective visualization and trends forecasting of crime data. IEEE Access, 7, 106111–106123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, R., Ye, Z., Wang, H., & Wu, B. (2018). Chronic diseases and health monitoring big data: A survey. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 11, 275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Louridas, P., & Ebert, C. (2016). Machine learning. IEEE Software, 33(5), 110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Design Thinking Team. (2018). Three categories of machine learning: supervised, enhanced, unsupervised. In Design thinking in AI.

  7. Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining.

  8. Huang, Y. (2018). XGBoost-A scalable tree boosting system: One of the most commonly used algorithms in the Kaggle competition. In Medium.

  9. Jain, A. (2016). Complete guide to parameter tuning in XGBoost with codes in Python. In Analytics Vidhya.

  10. Prabhu. (2018). Understanding hyperparameters and its optimisation techniques. In Medium.

  11. Joseph, R. (2018). Grid search for model tuning. In Medium.

  12. Ferroni, P., Zanzotto, F. M., Riondino, S., Scarpato, N., Guadagni, F., & Roselli, M. (2019). Breast cancer prognosis using a machine learning approach. Cancers, 11, 328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rau, C.-S., Wu, S.-C., Chuang, J.-F., Huang, C.-Y., Liu, H.-T., Chien, P.-C., & Hsieh, C.-H. (2019). Machine learning models of survival prediction in trauma patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8, 799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pedregosa, F., et al. (2011). Scikit-learn algorithm cheat-sheet: Machine learning in Python. JMLR, 12, 2825–2830

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasan, M. K., Alam, M. A., Das, D., Hossain, E., & Hasan, M. (2020). Diabetes prediction using ensembling of different machine learning classifiers. IEEE Access, 8, 76516–76531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Le, J. (2019). A tour of the top 10 algorithms for machine learning newbies. In US Tech Hubs.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the "Allied Advanced Intelligent Biomedical Research Center, STUST" from Higher Education Sprout Project, Ministry of Education, Taiwan.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwo-Jiun Horng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horng, GJ., Lin, TC., Lee, KC. et al. Prediction of Prognosis in Emergency Trauma Patients with Optimal Limit Gradient Based on Grid Search Optimal Parameters. Wireless Pers Commun 120, 1741–1751 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08532-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08532-x

Keywords

Navigation