Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient Optimization Algorithms for Minimizing Delay and Packet Loss in Doppler and Geometric Spreading Environment in Underwater Sensor Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a Cooperative Ray Optimization Algorithm (CoROA) algorithm that helps minimizing the delay and packet loss arising as result of Doppler and the geometric spreading environment in underwater acoustic networks. The existing algorithms perform routing and energy management for an underwater network in the temperature and salinity environment. The proposed CoROA algorithm is known for the efficient performance in different environments such as spatial and temporal variation for improving the battery life, network lifetime and throughput. The CoROA algorithm has more than one path through relay node to reach the destination node and improves the packet delivery, throughput and minimizes the delay and packet drop. The CoROA algorithm compares well with the existing algorithms that include AODV, Lion Optimized Cognitive Acoustic Network and Cat Optimization Algorithm in cognitive networks and shows better performance in terms of efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

NS2 code in aquasim available from corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Ali, M., Khan, A., Aurangzeb, K., Ali, I., Mahmood, H., Haider, S., & Bhatti, N. (2019). CoSiM-RPO: cooperative routing with sink mobility for reliable and persistent operation in underwater acoustic wireless sensor networks. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19051101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coutinho, R., Boukerche, A., Vieira, L., & Loureiro, A. (2016). Geographic and opportunistic routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65(2), 548–561.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Diamant, R., Casari, P., Campagnaro, F., Kebkal, O., Kebkal, V., & Zorzi, M. (2018). Fair and throughput-optimal routing in multimodal underwater networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(3), 1738–1754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghafoor, H., & Koo, I. (2017). Cognitive routing in software-defined underwater acoustic networks. MDPI Journal Applied Science, 7(12), 1312.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghafoor, H., Noh, Y., & Koo, I. (2017). OFDM-based spectrum-aware routing in underwater cognitive acoustic networks. IET Communications, 11(17), 2613–2620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsu, C., Liu, H., Gomez, J., & Chou, C. (2015). Delay-Sensitive opportunistic routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(11), 6584–6591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Javaid, N., Cheema, S., Akbar, M., & Alrajeh, N. (2017). Balanced energy consumption based adaptive routing for IoT enabling underwater WSNs. IEEE Access, 5, 10040–10051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Javaid, N., Maqsood, H., Wadood, A., Niaz, I., Almogren, A., Alamri, A., & Ilahi, M. (2017). A localization based cooperative routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Mobile Information Systems, Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7954175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang, M., Li, J., Goa, L., & Wang, Y. (2011). Simple underwater wireless communication system. Advanced in Control Engineering and Information Science, 15, 2459–2463.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khan, A., Ali, I., Rahman, A. U., Imran, M., & Mahmood, H. (2018). Co-EEORS: cooperative energy efficient optimal relay selection protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 6, 28777–28789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khan, A., Khan, M., Ahmed, S., AbdRahman, M. A., & Khan, M. (2019). Energy harvesting based routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. PLoS ONE, 14(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan, A., Altowaijri, S. M., Ali, I., & Rahman, A. (2019). Reliability-aware cooperative routing with adaptive amplification for underwater acoustic wireless sensor networks. Symmetry. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pervaiz, K., Wahid, A., Sajid, M., Khizar, M., Khan, Z.A., Qasim, U., & Javaid, N. (2016) DEAC: Depth and energy aware cooperative routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2016 10th international conference on complex, intelligent, and software intensive systems (CISIS), Fukuoka, Japan, 6–8 (pp. 150–158).

  14. Qadir, J., Khan, A., Zareei, M., & Rosales, C. (2019). Energy balanced localization-free cooperative noise-aware routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12224263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahman, M., Lee, Y., & Koo, I. (2017). EECOR: an energy-efficient cooperative opportunistic routing protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access, Special Section On Underwater Wireless Communications And Networking, 5, 14119–14132. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2730233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tran-Dang, H., & Kim, D. (2019). Channel-aware energy-efficient two-hop cooperative routing protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access, 7, 63181–63194. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ullah, U., Khan, A., Zareei, M., Ali, I., Khattak, H. A., & Din, I. (2019). Energy-effective cooperative and reliable delivery routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12132630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yahya, A., Islam, S., Zahid, M., Ahmed, G., Raza, M., Pervaiz, H., & Yang, F. (2019). Cooperative routing for energy efficient underwater wireless sensor networks. Special Section On Emerging Trends, Issues And Challenges In Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks, IEEE Access, 7, 141888–141899. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, X., Song, K., Li, C., & Yang, L. (2017). Parameter estimation for multi-scale multi-lag underwater acoustic channels based on modified particle Swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Access, 5, 4808–4820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Rajeswari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajeswari, A., Duraipandian, N., Shanker, N.R. et al. Efficient Optimization Algorithms for Minimizing Delay and Packet Loss in Doppler and Geometric Spreading Environment in Underwater Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 121, 49–67 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08623-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08623-9

Keywords

Navigation