Abstract
This paper proposes a Cooperative Ray Optimization Algorithm (CoROA) algorithm that helps minimizing the delay and packet loss arising as result of Doppler and the geometric spreading environment in underwater acoustic networks. The existing algorithms perform routing and energy management for an underwater network in the temperature and salinity environment. The proposed CoROA algorithm is known for the efficient performance in different environments such as spatial and temporal variation for improving the battery life, network lifetime and throughput. The CoROA algorithm has more than one path through relay node to reach the destination node and improves the packet delivery, throughput and minimizes the delay and packet drop. The CoROA algorithm compares well with the existing algorithms that include AODV, Lion Optimized Cognitive Acoustic Network and Cat Optimization Algorithm in cognitive networks and shows better performance in terms of efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Code availability
NS2 code in aquasim available from corresponding author upon request.
References
Ali, M., Khan, A., Aurangzeb, K., Ali, I., Mahmood, H., Haider, S., & Bhatti, N. (2019). CoSiM-RPO: cooperative routing with sink mobility for reliable and persistent operation in underwater acoustic wireless sensor networks. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19051101
Coutinho, R., Boukerche, A., Vieira, L., & Loureiro, A. (2016). Geographic and opportunistic routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65(2), 548–561.
Diamant, R., Casari, P., Campagnaro, F., Kebkal, O., Kebkal, V., & Zorzi, M. (2018). Fair and throughput-optimal routing in multimodal underwater networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(3), 1738–1754.
Ghafoor, H., & Koo, I. (2017). Cognitive routing in software-defined underwater acoustic networks. MDPI Journal Applied Science, 7(12), 1312.
Ghafoor, H., Noh, Y., & Koo, I. (2017). OFDM-based spectrum-aware routing in underwater cognitive acoustic networks. IET Communications, 11(17), 2613–2620.
Hsu, C., Liu, H., Gomez, J., & Chou, C. (2015). Delay-Sensitive opportunistic routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(11), 6584–6591.
Javaid, N., Cheema, S., Akbar, M., & Alrajeh, N. (2017). Balanced energy consumption based adaptive routing for IoT enabling underwater WSNs. IEEE Access, 5, 10040–10051.
Javaid, N., Maqsood, H., Wadood, A., Niaz, I., Almogren, A., Alamri, A., & Ilahi, M. (2017). A localization based cooperative routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Mobile Information Systems, Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7954175
Jiang, M., Li, J., Goa, L., & Wang, Y. (2011). Simple underwater wireless communication system. Advanced in Control Engineering and Information Science, 15, 2459–2463.
Khan, A., Ali, I., Rahman, A. U., Imran, M., & Mahmood, H. (2018). Co-EEORS: cooperative energy efficient optimal relay selection protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 6, 28777–28789.
Khan, A., Khan, M., Ahmed, S., AbdRahman, M. A., & Khan, M. (2019). Energy harvesting based routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. PLoS ONE, 14(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219459
Khan, A., Altowaijri, S. M., Ali, I., & Rahman, A. (2019). Reliability-aware cooperative routing with adaptive amplification for underwater acoustic wireless sensor networks. Symmetry. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030421
Pervaiz, K., Wahid, A., Sajid, M., Khizar, M., Khan, Z.A., Qasim, U., & Javaid, N. (2016) DEAC: Depth and energy aware cooperative routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2016 10th international conference on complex, intelligent, and software intensive systems (CISIS), Fukuoka, Japan, 6–8 (pp. 150–158).
Qadir, J., Khan, A., Zareei, M., & Rosales, C. (2019). Energy balanced localization-free cooperative noise-aware routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12224263
Rahman, M., Lee, Y., & Koo, I. (2017). EECOR: an energy-efficient cooperative opportunistic routing protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access, Special Section On Underwater Wireless Communications And Networking, 5, 14119–14132. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2730233
Tran-Dang, H., & Kim, D. (2019). Channel-aware energy-efficient two-hop cooperative routing protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access, 7, 63181–63194. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916185
Ullah, U., Khan, A., Zareei, M., Ali, I., Khattak, H. A., & Din, I. (2019). Energy-effective cooperative and reliable delivery routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12132630
Yahya, A., Islam, S., Zahid, M., Ahmed, G., Raza, M., Pervaiz, H., & Yang, F. (2019). Cooperative routing for energy efficient underwater wireless sensor networks. Special Section On Emerging Trends, Issues And Challenges In Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks, IEEE Access, 7, 141888–141899. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941422
Zhang, X., Song, K., Li, C., & Yang, L. (2017). Parameter estimation for multi-scale multi-lag underwater acoustic channels based on modified particle Swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Access, 5, 4808–4820.
Funding
Not Applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajeswari, A., Duraipandian, N., Shanker, N.R. et al. Efficient Optimization Algorithms for Minimizing Delay and Packet Loss in Doppler and Geometric Spreading Environment in Underwater Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 121, 49–67 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08623-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08623-9