Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Communication Disorder Outside Intellectual Disability? A Review and Classification Approach to Receptive and Expressive Communication in Intellectual Disability

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Speech plays an imperative part in friendly and verbal correspondence for people. 'Verbal correspondence' signifies communicating thoughts, sentiments and considerations, and 'speech' is a medium to convey data, which isn't limited to explanation content. Further, it reaches out to data about the speaker's orientation, age and reason and a few different elements. The primary parts of a familiar language are voice, explanation and familiarity. Voice is the sound created by vocal strings and breathing; explanation alludes to uttering a right strong; familiarity is the beat of speech, for example, how to convey a familiar speech. These three parts are interrelated and assume a fundamental part in the creation of an expressive dialogue. Correspondence errors debilitate the strategy of starting a mental turn of events and future stages. There are a few neurodevelopmental messes like a chemical imbalance, down disorder, which straightforwardly influence speech advancement. Scholarly incapacity is one of the neurodevelopmental infections classified by language issues, strange social way of behaving, less interest in correspondence, and fanatical and redundant way of behaving. Beginning mental advancement is straightforwardly subject to correspondence abilities. Neurodevelopment problems like down condition, chemical imbalance and so on, can straightforwardly influence speech and language improvement at the beginning and future stages. Scholarly inability is likewise a neurodevelopmental problem that causes speech and language impedances, strange social ways of behaving and less interest in correspondence. It is to some degree an over the top way of behaving. In this review, an intensive audit has been introduced to illuminate responsive and expressive correspondence attributes in people with scholarly incapacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. The datasets which have been shown is taken from the published papers which are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. In the further studies we have generated the datasets by our own and it is not available on any public domain. The dataset can be obtained on a reasonable request.

Code Availability

No code is applicable to this article as it is a review article.

References

  1. Morris, A. J., Filippetti, M. L., & Rigato, S. (2022). The impact of parents’ smartphone use on language development in young children. Child Development Perspectives, 16(2), 103–109.

  2. Luo, R., Masek, L. R., Alper, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2022). Maternal question use and child language outcomes: The moderating role of children’s vocabulary skills and socioeconomic status. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 59, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Romeo, R. R., Flournoy, J. C., McLaughlin, K. A., & Lengua, L. J. (2022). Language development as a mechanism linking socioeconomic status to executive functioning development in preschool. Developmental Science, e13227.

  4. Andalò, B., Rigo, F., Rossi, G., Majorano, M., & Lavelli, M. (2022). Do motor skills impact on language development between 18 and 30 months of age? Infant Behavior and Development, 66, 101667.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cutler, A., Klein, W., & Levinson, S. C. (2017). The cornerstones of twenty-first century psycholinguistics. Twenty-first century psycholinguistics (pp. 1–20). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kumin, L. (2003). Early communication skills for children with Down syndrome: A guide for parents and professionals. Woodbine House.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iwamoto, K., Kikuchi, H., & Mazuka, R. (2022). Speech rate development in Japanese-speaking children and proficiency in mora-timed rhythm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 220, 105411.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oller, D. K. (1980). The emergence of the sounds of speech in infancy. In: Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Kavanagh, J. F., & Ferguson, C. A. (Eds.), Child phonology (Vol. 1, pp. 93–112).

  10. Sheinkopf, S. J., Mundy, P., Oller, D. K., & Steffens, M. (2000). Vocal atypicalities of preverbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(4), 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wetherby, A. M., Woods, J., Allen, L., Cleary, J., Dickinson, H., & Lord, C. (2004). Early indicators of autism spectrum disorders in the second year of life. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(5), 473–493.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Batshaw, M. L. (2002). Children with disabilities (5th ed.). Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Petersen, M. C., Kube, D. A., & Palmer, F. B. (1998). Classification of developmental delays. Seminars in pediatric neurology (pp. 2–14). WB Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  14. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kent, R. D. (2022). The maturational gradient of infant vocalizations: Developmental stages and functional modules. Infant Behavior and Development, 66, 101682.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dockrell, J. E. (2001). Assessing language skills in preschool children. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 6(2), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brammer, M. S., & Vicari, C. A. (2020). Physicians’ perceptions about collaborating with speech-language pathologists for dysphagia treatment in interprofessional healthcare. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 20, 100355.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zabel, T. A., Rao, R., Jacobson, L. A., Pritchard, A. E., Mahone, E. M., & Kalb, L. (2020). An abbreviated WISC-5 model for identifying youth at risk for intellectual disability in a mixed clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1–13.

  19. Godfrey, M., & Lee, N. R. (2020). A comprehensive examination of the memory profile of youth with Down syndrome in comparison to typically developing peers. Child Neuropsychology, 26(6), 721–738.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carvajal, F., Fernández-Alcaraz, C., Rueda, M., & Sarrión, L. (2012). Processing of facial expressions of emotions by adults with Down syndrome and moderate intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(3), 783–790.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ouellette-Kuntz, H. (2005). Understanding health disparities and inequities faced by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(2), 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Havercamp, S. M., Scandlin, D., & Roth, M. (2004). Health disparities among adults with developmental disabilities, adults with other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina. Public Health Reports, 119(4), 418–426.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Drainoni, M. L., Lee-Hood, E., Tobias, C., Bachman, S. S., Andrew, J., & Maisels, L. (2006). Cross-disability experiences of barriers to health-care access: Consumer perspectives. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17(2), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ward, R. L., Nichols, A. D., & Freedman, R. I. (2010). Uncovering health care inequalities among adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Health & Social Work, 35(4), 280–290.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dhondt, A., Van Keer, I., Nijs, S., van der Putten, A., & Maes, B. (2021). In search of a novel way to analyze early communicative behavior. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 37(2), 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cheslock, M. A., Barton-Hulsey, A., Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. A. (2008). Using a speech-generating device to enhance communicative abilities for an adult with moderate intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(5), 376–386.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Koul, R., & Clapsaddle, K. C. (2006). Effects of repeated listening experiences on the perception of synthetic speech by individuals with mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(2), 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Matson, J. L., Horovitz, M., Kozlowski, A. M., Sipes, M., Worley, J. A., & Shoemaker, M. E. (2011). Person characteristics of individuals in functional assessment research. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 621–624.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Abbeduto, L., & Nuccio, J. B. (1991). Relation between receptive language and cognitive maturity in persons with mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation: AJMR, 96(2), 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bowers, L., Brennan, G., & Winship, G. (2009). Talking with acutely psychotic people: Communication skills for nurses and others spending time with people who are very mentally ill. City University.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Belva, B. C., & Matson, J. L. (2013). An examination of specific daily living skills deficits in adults with profound intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 596–604.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kail, R. (1992). General slowing of information-processing by persons with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cascella, P. W. (2004). Receptive communication abilities among adults with significant intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 29(1), 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  34. van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2011). Assessing preferences for AAC options in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1422–1431.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cascella, P. W. (2006). Standardised speech-language tests and students with intellectual disability: A review of normative data. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31(2), 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gallagher, E. (2002). Fundamentals of theory and practice revisited: Adult clients with mild ‘intellectual disability’: Rethinking our assumptions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 23(4), 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hollenweger, J., & Moretti, M. (2012). Using the international classification of functioning, disability and health children and youth version in education systems: A new approach to eligibility. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 91(13), S97–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Luckasson, R., & Schalock, R. L. (2013). Defining and applying a functionality approach to intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(7), 657–668.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Söderholm, S., Meinander, M., & Alaranta, H. (2001). Augmentative and alternative communication methods in locked-in syndrome. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33(5), 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Matson, J. L., Sipes, M., Horovitz, M., Worley, J. A., Shoemaker, M. E., & Kozlowski, A. M. (2011). Behaviors and corresponding functions addressed via functional assessment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 625–629.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kurtz, P. F., Boelter, E. W., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Chin, M. D., & Hagopian, L. P. (2011). An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2935–2942.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Iacono, T., West, D., Bloomberg, K., & Johnson, H. (2009). Reliability and validity of the revised Triple C: C hecklist of C ommunicative C ompetencies for adults with severe and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(1), 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bloomberg, K., West, D., & Johnson, H. (1999). The Triple C: Checklist of communication competencies. 2 “He doesn’t use his Talker much!”, 34.

  44. Purcell, M., Morris, I., & McConkey, R. (1999). Staff perceptions of the communicative competence of adult persons with intellectual disabilities. The British Journal of Development Disabilities, 45(88), 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mansfield, P. M., & Pinto, M. B. (2008). Consumer vulnerability and credit card knowledge among developmentally disabled citizens. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42(3), 425–438.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Brady, N. C., & McLean, L. K. (1998). Simultaneous and delayed matching to sample in gesture users and speakers with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19(5), 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ypsilanti, A., & Grouios, G. (2008). Linguistic profile of individuals with Down syndrome: Comparing the linguistic performance of three developmental disorders. Child Neuropsychology, 14(2), 148–170.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Caselli, M. C., Monaco, L., Trasciani, M., & Vicari, S. (2008). Language in Italian children with Down syndrome and with specific language impairment. Neuropsychology, 22(1), 27.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Skarżyński, P. H., Rajchel, J. J., Gos, E., Dziendziel, B., Kutyba, J., Bieńkowska, K., & Skarżyński, H. (2020). A revised grading system for the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory based on a large clinical population. International Journal of Audiology, 59(1), 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Roberts, J. E., Price, J., & Malkin, C. (2007). Language and communication development in Down syndrome. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(1), 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Abells, D., Burbidge, J., & Minnes, P. (2008). Involvement of adolescents with intellectual disabilities in social and recreational activities. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 14(2), 88.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Murphy, N. A., & Carbone, P. S. (2008). Promoting the participation of children with disabilities in sports, recreation, and physical activities. Pediatrics, 121(5), 1057–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pratt, H. D., & Greydanus, D. E. (2007). Intellectual disability (mental retardation) in children and adolescents. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 34(2), 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Westendorp, M., Houwen, S., Hartman, E., & Visscher, C. (2011). Are gross motor skills and sports participation related in children with intellectual disabilities? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 1147–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rimmer, J. H., Rowland, J. L., & Yamaki, K. (2007). Obesity and secondary conditions in adolescents with disabilities: Addressing the needs of an underserved population. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(3), 224–229.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Næss, K. A. B., Ostad, J., & Nygaard, E. (2021). Differences and similarities in predictors of expressive vocabulary development between children with Down syndrome and young typically developing children. Brain Sciences, 11(3), 312.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tjaden, K. K., & Liss, J. M. (1995). The role of listener familiarity in the perception of dysarthric speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 9(2), 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kent, R. D., Kaiser, A. P., & Gray, D. B. (1993). Speech intelligibility and communicative competence in children. Enhancing Children’s Communication: Research Foundations for Intervention, 223–239.

  59. Hodapp, R. M. (2021). Ed Zigler's developmental approach to intellectual disabilities: Past, present, and future contributions. Development and Psychopathology, 33(2), 453–465.

  60. Mervis, C. B. (1997). Developmental relations between cognition and language: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Research on communication and language disorders: Contributions to theories of language development, 75–100.

  61. Stoel-Gammon, C. (2001). Down syndrome phonology: Developmental patterns and intervention strategies. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 7(3), 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Singer Harris, N. G., Bellugi, U., Bates, E., Jones, W., & Rossen, M. (1997). Contrasting profiles of language development in children with Williams and Down syndromes. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13(3), 345–370.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Baxter, R., Rees, R., Perovic, A., & Hulme, C. (2021). The nature and causes of children's grammatical difficulties: Evidence from an intervention to improve past tense marking in children with down syndrome. Developmental Science.

  64. Ballard, K. J., Djaja, D., Arciuli, J., James, D. G., & van Doorn, J. (2012). Developmental trajectory for production of prosody: Lexical stress contrastivity in children ages 3 to 7 years and in adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(6), 1822–1835.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Assmann, P. F., Nearey, T. M., & Bharadwaj, S. V. (2013). Developmental patterns in children’s speech: Patterns of spectral change in vowels. Vowel inherent spectral change (pp. 199–230). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Swamy, S., & Ramakrishnan, K. V. (2013). An efficient speech recognition system. Computer Science & Engineering, 3(4), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hofmann, N. Speech recognition for human computer interaction. In: ETH Zurich, hofmannn@ student. ethz. ch, Ubiquitous computing seminar FS2014.

  68. Shrawankar, U., & Thakare, V. M. (2013). Techniques for feature extraction in speech recognition system: A comparative study. arXiv preprint arXiv:1305.1145.

  69. Dave, N. (2013). Feature extraction methods LPC, PLP and MFCC in speech recognition. International Journal for Advance Research in Engineering and Technology, 1(6), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Liu, Q., Yao, M., Xu, H., & Wang, F. (2013). Research on different feature parameters in speaker recognition. Journal of Signal and Information Processing, 4(02), 106.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Gaurav, G., Deiv, D. S., Sharma, G. K., & Bhattacharya, M. (2012). Development of application specific continuous speech recognition system in Hindi. Journal of Signal and Information Processing, 3(03), 394.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Arjmandi, M. K., Ghasemzadeh, H., & Dilley, L. C. (2020). Simulated cochlear-implant processing reveals major loss of acoustic information relevant to talkers’ voice quality differences. medRxiv.

  73. Nordenberg, M., & Sundberg, J. (2004). Effect on LTAS of vocal loudness variation. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 29(4), 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bonneh, Y. S., Levanon, Y., Dean-Pardo, O., Lossos, L., & Adini, Y. (2011). Abnormal speech spectrum and increased pitch variability in young autistic children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 237.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Goberman, A. M., & Robb, M. P. (1999). Acoustic examination of preterm and full-term infant cries: The long-time average spectrum. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(4), 850–861.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Sharda, M., Subhadra, T. P., Sahay, S., Nagaraja, C., Singh, L., Mishra, R., & Singh, N. C. (2010). Sounds of melody—Pitch patterns of speech in autism. Neuroscience Letters, 478(1), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Assmann, P. F., & Katz, W. F. (2000). Time-varying spectral change in the vowels of children and adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(4), 1856–1866.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Garcia, F. J., Powell, M. B., Brubacher, S. P., Eisenchlas, S. A., & Low-Choy, S. (2022). The influence of transition prompt wording on response informativeness and rapidity of disclosure in child forensic interviews. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law.

  79. Wechsler, D. (2012). WPPSI-IV: Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence. Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Harrison, P., & Oakland, T. (2003). Adaptive behavior assessment system (ABAS-II). The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Bosl, W., Tierney, A., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Nelson, C. (2011). EEG complexity as a biomarker for autism spectrum disorder risk. BMC Medicine, 9(1), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Bicego, M., Murino, V., & Figueiredo, M. A. (2004). Similarity-based classification of sequences using hidden Markov models. Pattern Recognition, 37(12), 2281–2291.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Yang, J., & Delpha, C. (2022). An incipient fault diagnosis methodology using local Mahalanobis distance: Detection process based on empirical probability density estimation. Signal Processing, 190, 108308.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Aggarwal, G., & Singh, L. (2019). Classification of intellectual disability using LPC, LPCC, and WLPCC parameterization techniques. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 41(6), 470–479.

  85. Aggarwal, G., & Singh, L. (2018). Evaluation of supervised learning algorithms based on speech features as predictors to the diagnosis of mild to moderate intellectual disability. 3D Research, 9(4), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Aggarwal, G., & Singh, L. (2020). Comparisons of speech parameterisation techniques for classification of intellectual disability using machine learning. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), 14(2), 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Aggarwal, G., Monga, R., & Gochhayat, S. P. (2020). A novel hybrid PSO assisted optimization for classification of intellectual disability using Speech signal. Wireless Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07301-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Smith, J. O. (2007). Mathematics of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT): with audio applications. Julius Smith.

  89. Graves, A., Mohamed, A. R., & Hinton, G. (2013). Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In: Acoustics, speech and signal processing (icassp), 2013 IEEE international conference on (pp. 6645–6649). IEEE.

Download references

Funding

No funding agencies is applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study as it is a review article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of IT and Engineering, Amity University in Tashkent, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

    Gaurav Aggarwal

Authors
  1. Gaurav Aggarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Aggarwal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I have no conflicts of interest to disclose. No financial conflicts with any author or agencies.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aggarwal, G. Social Communication Disorder Outside Intellectual Disability? A Review and Classification Approach to Receptive and Expressive Communication in Intellectual Disability. Wireless Pers Commun 127, 2841–2858 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09899-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09899-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation