Skip to main content
Log in

Design and Analysis of a Novel Rectangular-3D Position Allocator to Improve QoS in Manet

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) provides transmission of data between the nodes in an infrastructure less atmosphere. Nodes are highly mobile and dynamic which distresses the QoS in MANET. It is important to use suitable position allocator to allocate the nodes in MANET. The network's performance is influenced by the environment type as well as a proper routing protocol, mobility model, and position allocators. For highly dynamic environment, it is advisable to use appropriate mobility model along with the position allocator. This paper gives a brief overview about the existing position allocators used for simulation in NS-3. We have designed and implemented Rectangular-3D Position Allocator for NS-3 using the concept of existing Grid Position Allocator. We have done simulation analysis with the proposed allocator with the Random Box position allocator in static network and dynamic (stable and unstable) network on routing protocols AODV and DSDV by considering throughput, delay, and PDR as the QoS metrics. It has been determined that the Rectangular-3D position allocator performs better in static network for different values of parameters like number of nodes, packet size, simulation time and simulation area with QoS parameters like PDR, delay, and throughput for both AODV and DSDV routing protocols. It is also examined that the stable network gives better performance in comparison to unstable network for different parameters for both the routing protocols. When comparing the three QoS metrics, it is found that AODV performs much better than DSDV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as it is simulation based but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Pushp, S., Satish, C. (2019) QoS in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. Wireless Personal Communications

  2. Ahlam, H. M. (2022). Optimize routing protocol overheads in MANETs: Challenges and solutions: A review paper. Wireless Personal Communications, 126(4), 2871–2910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jayabarathan, J. K., Sivanantharaja, A., & Robinson, S. (2017). Quality of service enhancement of mobile adhoc networks using priority aware mechanism in AODV protocol. Wireless Personal Communications, 96, 5897–5909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar, S. (2022). Security enhancement in mobile ad-hoc network using novel data integrity based hash protection process. Wireless Personal Communications, 123, 1059–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Srilakshmi, U., Alghamdi, S. A., Vuyyuru, V. A., Veeraiah, N., & Alotaibi, Y. (2022). A secure optimization routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Access, 10, 14260–14269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan, M. F., Das, I. (2019) An investigation on existing protocols in MANET. Innovations in Computer Science and Engineering. (pp.215–224) Springer, Singapore.

  7. Khan, M. F., & Das, I. (2019). Effect of different propagation models in routing protocols. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 9(2), 3975–3980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Murthy, C. S. R., & Manoj, B. S. (2004). Ad hoc wireless networks: Architectures and protocols. Prentice Hall PTR.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khan, M. F., Das, I. (2022) Impact of various parameters on gauss markov mobility model to support QoS in MANET. In: Cloud Computing Enabled Big-Data Analytics in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks (pp. 85–101)

  10. Mikitiuk, A., & Trojanowski, K. (2020). Maximization of the sensor network lifetime by activity schedule heuristic optimization. Ad Hoc Networks, 96, 101994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhong, X., et al. (2020). On the distribution of nodal distances in random wireless ad hoc network with mobile node.". Ad Hoc Networks, 97, 102026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhungana, A., & Bulut, E. (2020). Peer-to-peer energy sharing in mobile networks: Applications, challenges, and open problems. Ad Hoc Networks, 97, 102029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan, M. F., Das, I. (2017) A study on quality-of-service routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks. In: 2017 International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies for Smart Nation (IC3TSN). IEEE.

  14. https://www.nsnam.org/doxygen/classns3_1_1_position_allocator.html (accessed on dtd 12/04/2020).

  15. Khan, M. F., & Das, I. (2020). Implementation of random direction-3D mobility model to achieve better QoS support in MANET. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(10), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan, M. F., & Das, I. (2021). (202) Analysis of various mobility models and their impact on QoS in MANET. Computationally Intelligent Systems and their Applications, 950, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khan, M. F., & Das, I. (2022). “performance analysis of improved mobility models to check their impact on QoS in MANET. Advanced Computing and Intelligent Technologies, 914, 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guimarães, D. A., Frigieri, E. P., & Sakai, L. J. (2020). Influence of node mobility, recharge, and path loss on the optimized lifetime of wireless rechargeable sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 97, 102025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Camp, T., Boleng, J., & Davies, V. (2002). A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless communications and mobile computing, 2(5), 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, D. B., David A. M. (1996) Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. Mobile computing. Springer (pp.153–181) Boston, MA

  21. Ariyakhajorn, J., Wannawilai, P., Sathitwiriyawong, C. (2006) A comparative study of random waypoint and gauss-markov mobility models in the performance evaluation of MANET. In 2006 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies, Bangkok (pp. 894-899)

  22. Arun, M., Brindha, M., & Vanathi, P. T. (2015). Implementation of stationary models for localization in wireless sensor network using ns3. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences., 9(27), 708–714.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khan, M. F., & Das, I. (2020). Performance evaluation of routing protocols in NS-2 and NS-3 simulators. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(4), 6509–6517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Perkins, C. E., Elizabeth, M. R. (1999) Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. IEEE.

  25. Ahmed, A., Hanan, A., & Izzeldin, O. (2015). AODV routing protocol working process. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 10(2), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chakeres, I. D., Elizabeth M. B. –R. (2004) AODV routing protocol implementation design. In 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2004. Proceedings. IEEE.

  27. Ramya, A. S. (2015). Destination sequenced-distance vector algorithm. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 7(11), 129.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Perkins, C. E., & Pravin, B. (1994). Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 24(4), 234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Khan, M. F., & Das, I. (2022). Critical analysis of modified gauss markov mobility model using varying values of parameters to check the impact of QoS In MANET. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology., 17(5), 3393–3409.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Dr. MFK and Dr. ID. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Dr. MFK and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Munsifa Firdaus Khan.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, M.F., Das, I. Design and Analysis of a Novel Rectangular-3D Position Allocator to Improve QoS in Manet. Wireless Pers Commun 129, 1513–1562 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10185-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10185-x

Keywords

Navigation