Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design of a new CPEDSR Protocol for Optimizing the Communication in Mobile Network

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The congestion problem can occur in a cooperative network because of the non-responsiveness of intermediate nodes or heavy traffic. Existing DSR cannot optimize the communication route in a such high congestion situation. In this paper, a new CPEDSR protocol is presented for handling energy and congestion-critical situations in the mobile network. The main objective of the proposed protocol is to identify the suspected attacked and congested nodes and perform communication over safe and reliable nodes.In this improved protocol, a congestion ratio-based probabilistic measure is employed for computing the congestion-resistance (CR) for each node. The weight is evaluated based on connectivity count (CC), residual energy (RE), average participation (AP), and average failure (AF) ratios. After computing the individual parameter, the overall CR is estimated to label the congestion-safe nodes. The weight rules are implied on CR for deciding the participation eligibility of the node. With each communication session, a more effective and accurate decision for node participation is taken. It is an experience adaptive protocol that acquires some weightage of the previous status for making decisions about the current node. This participation degree of neighbor nodes is processed by the DSR protocol to identify the next effective hop. The simulation is performed in congested and DDOS-infected networks. The comparative analysis is done against the existing and improved reactive protocols. The proposed protocol is validated on four network scenarios with a varied number of nodes and in attacked, non-attacked, and heavy traffic situations. The proposed CPEDSR protocol is validated against DSR, AODV, SAODV, PSAODV, PDS-AODV, and RSKNSN protocols. The average loss rate of AODV, DSR, SAODV, PSAODV, PDS-AODV, RSKNSN, and the proposed CPEDSR protocols for all scenarios is 15.07, 18.99, 10.62, 7.09, 8.30, 9.27, and 6.08%. The average number of dead nodes for all scenarios is 20.75 for AODV, 22.75 for DSR, 19.75 for SAODV, 18.5 for PSAODV, 18.25 for PDS-AODV, 16.75 for RSKNSN, and 14 for CPEDSR. It shows that the proposed protocol improved the network life and reduced communication loss during transmission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

No data and material is taken or used in this research. The analysis results used in this paper are cited properly.

Code Availability

Not Available.

References

  1. Muchtar, F., Abdullah, A. H., Al-Adhaileh, M., & Zamli, K. Z. (2020). Energy conservation strategies in Named Data Networking based MANET using congestion control: A review. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 152, 102511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma, N., Gupta, A., Rajput, S. S., & Yadav, V. K. (2016) Congestion control techniques in MANET: A survey. In: Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT), pp. 280–282.

  3. Sirajuddin, M. D., Rupa, C., & Prasad, A. (2016) Advanced congestion control techniques for MANET. In: Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications, pp. 271–279.

  4. Rajawat, S., Kuri, M., Chaudhary, A., & Choudhary, S. S (2016) Effective congestion less dynamic source routing for data transmission in MANETs. In: International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, pp. 499–511.

  5. Yuvaraj, D., Sivaram, M., & Nageswari, S. (2019). Some investigation on DDOS attack models in mobile networks. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(10), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Batra, J., & Krishna, C. R. (2019). Ddos attack detection and prevention using Aodv routing mechanism and Ffbp neural network in a manet. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(2), 4136–4142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuvaraj, D., Sivaram, M., Ahamed, A. U., & Nageswari, S. (2019). Some investigation on DDOS attack models in mobile networks. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 13(10), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanellopoulos, D. (2019). Congestion control for MANETs: An overview. ICT Express, 5(2), 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah, S. A., Nazir, B., & Khan, I. A. (2017). Congestion control algorithms in wireless sensor networks: Trends and opportunities. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 29(3), 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta, S., & Prasad, G. (2016) Enhanced load balancing and delay constraint AOMDV routing in MANET. In: Symposium on Colossal Data Analysis and Networking (CDAN), pp. 1–6.

  11. Mohamed, N. J., Sahib, S., Suryana, N., & Hussin, B. (2016). Understanding network congestion effects on performance - Articles review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 92(2), 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hamamreh, R. A. (2019). SDCM: Secure dynamic end-to-end congestion avoidance protocol for MANETs. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 27(21), 3122–3131.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Irudayarajan, S., Punitha, P., Shanthini, J., & Karthik, S., (2018) A Review on load balancing for reducing congestion in mobile Ad-Hoc networks. In: International Conference on Soft-computing and Network Security (ICSNS), pp. 1–7.

  14. Mallapur, S. V., Patil, S. R., & Agarkhed, J. V. (2017). Load balancing technique for congestion control multipath routing protocol in MANETs. Wireless Personal Communications, 92(2), 749–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson, Y. H., et al. (2019). Link-Disjoint multipath routing for network traffic overload handling in mobile Ad-hoc networks. IEEE Access, 7, 143312–143323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Balaji, S., & Robinson, Y. H. (2018) Development of multipath resilience routing technique to improve the fault tolerance in mobile Ad-Hoc networks. In: International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA);, pp. 743–747.

  17. Sharma, D. K., Patra, A. N., & Kumar, C. (2017). P-AODV: A priority based route maintenance process in mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 95(4), 4381–4402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohsin, A. H., Bakar, K. A., & Zainal, A. (2018). Optimal control overhead based multi-metric routing for MANET. Wireless Networks, 24(6), 2319–2335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gulati, M. K., Sachdeva, M., & Kumar, K. (2017). Load balanced and link break prediction routing protocol for mobile Ad Hoc networks. Journal of Communications, 12(6), 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaji, K., & Yoshihiro, T. (2017) Adaptive rerouting to avoid local congestion in MANETs. In: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1–6.

  21. Sarkar, D., Choudhury, S., & Majumder, A. (2018). Enhanced-Ant-AODV for optimal route selection in mobile ad-hoc network. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 33(10), 1186–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rathore, S., & Khan, M. R. (2016) Enhance congestion control multipath routing with ANT optimization in mobile ad hoc network. In: International Conference on ICT in Business Industry & Government (ICTBIG), pp. 1–7.

  23. Zhong, Z., Hamchaoui, I., Ferrieux, A., Khatoun, R., & Serhrouchni, A. (2018) CDBE: A cooperative way to improve end-to-end congestion control in mobile network. In: 14th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), pp. 216–223.

  24. Park, S., et al., (2018) ExLL: an extremely low-latency congestion control for mobile cellular networks. In: 14th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT '18), pp. 307–319.

  25. Turk, Y., & Zeydan, E. (2020). An experimental measurement analysis of congestion over converged fixed and mobile networks. Wireless Networks, 26, 1017–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaur, N., & Singhai, R. (2018) Minimizing congestion in mobile Ad hoc network using adaptive control packet frequency and data rate. In: Computing, Communication and Signal Processing, pp. 285–294.

  27. Sharma, V. K., & Kumar, M. (2017). Adaptive congestion control scheme in mobile ad-hoc networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 10(3), 633–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gururaj, H. L., & Ramesh, B. (2015) Congestion control for optimizing data transfer rate in mobile Ad-hoc networks using HSTCP. In: International Conference on Emerging Research in Electronics, Computer Science and Technology (ICERECT), pp. 1–5.

  29. Do Dinh, C., Van, T. N., & Gia, H. N. (2016). Improving AODV protocol to avoid congested areas in mobile Ad hoc networks. Indian Journal of Science & Technology, 9(39), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Amuthan, A., Sreenath, N., Boobalan, P., & Muthuraj, K. (2018). Dynamic multi-stage tandem queue modeling-based congestion adaptive routing for MANET. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(3), 1467–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mishra, A., & Baghel, A. S. (2018) Interference and congestion control using multichannel energy-based routing in MANET. In: International Conference on Recent Advancement on Computer and Communication, pp. 571–579.

  32. Ezhil Selvan, T. C., Malathi, P., & Ezhilin, F. S. (2020). An efficient method for adjustable load equalization for reducing traffic in routing for mobile Ad Hoc networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 110, 2149–2164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sliwa, B., Falkenberg, R., & Wietfeld, C (2017) A simple scheme for distributed passive load balancing in mobile Ad-Hoc networks. In: 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), pp. 1–5.

  34. Luo, P. (2016). Bloom filter based load balancing mechanis for mobile Ad Hoc networks. Journal of Communications, 11(11), 1012–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, D., & Zhou, D. (2017) Load balancing algorithm based on history information in MANET. In: 2nd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), pp. 737–742.

  36. Shanthi, H. J., & Anita, E. M. (2019). Secure and efficient location-aided routing against DDOS attack in Manet. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(3), 4820–4829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Juneja, K. (2020). DRI table based traffic-behaviour analysis approach for detection of blackhole attack. International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control, 10(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Juneja, K. (2019). Probabilistic dempster shafer based communication behaviour analysis for attack safe communication in mobile network. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 27(3), 1301–1316.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Juneja, K. (2020). Random-Session and K-Neighbour based suspected node analysis approach for cooperative blackhole detection in MANET. Wireless Personal Communications, 110(1), 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Kapil Juneja

Authors
  1. Kapil Juneja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kapil Juneja.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There is no conflict of interest, financial or others. I as sole author ensured the ethics approval and participation of the research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Juneja, K. Design of a new CPEDSR Protocol for Optimizing the Communication in Mobile Network. Wireless Pers Commun 129, 1315–1341 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10191-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10191-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation