Skip to main content
Log in

Does Web accessibility differ among banks?

  • Published:
World Wide Web Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Web Accessibility (WA) is an attribute that must be taken increasingly into account in the design of websites. In this paper we assess on whether the drivers of more accessible online information differ among banks using a structural equation modelling approach. It is concluded that Web Accessibility (WA) implementation is an important and affordable way that could be used to increase the possibilities to explore online information and to meet the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) demands of stakeholders. Our results show that smaller banks are more prone to WA implementation, which may help them to differentiate from its competitors and create strategic advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azofra, V., Santamaría, M.: El gobierno de las cajas de ahorro españolas. Univ Bus Rev 2, 48–59 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bagozzi, R.: Structural equation model in marketing research: principles of marketing research. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bagozzi, R., Yi, Y.: On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(2), 74–94 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R.: The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modelling: personal computer adoption and use as illustration. Technol Stud 2(2), 285–309 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bayo-Moriones, A., Lera-López, F.: A firm-level analysis of determinants of ICT adoption in Spain. Technovation 27(6–7), 352–366 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bos, J.W.B., Kolari, J.W., van Lamoen, R.C.R.: Competition and innovation: evidence from financial services. J. Bank Finance. 37, 1590–1601

  7. Bradbard, D.A., Peters, C., Caneva, Y.: Web accessibility policies at land-grant universities. Internet High Educ 13, 258–266 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Guarino, L., Vanderheiden, G. (Eds): Web content accessibility guidelines 2.0. W3C recommendation, available online at: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ (accessed 10 March 2014)

  9. Capra, E.P., Leal, S.B., Silveira, D.S., Ferreira, A.O.: Evaluation of Web accessibility: an approach related to functional illiteracy. Procedia Comput Sci 14, 36–46 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Castelo, M., Lima, L.: Social responsibility disclosure: a study of proxies for the public visibility of Portuguese Banks. Br Account Rev 40(2), 161–181 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. CECA: Libro verde sobre la responsabilidad social corporativa en el sector financiero: Una aproximación a la sostenibilidad desde las entidades financieras. CECA, Madrid (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chin, W.W.: Issues and opinions on structural equations modelling. MIS Q 22(1), 7–16 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., Jacobs, I. (Eds): Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. W3C recommendation, available online at: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/ (accessed 10 March 2014

  14. Corrocher, N.: Internet adoption in Italian banks: an empirical investigation. Res Policy 35, 533–544 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cowen, S.S., Ferreri, L.B., Parker, L.D.: The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Account Organ Soc 12(2), 111–122 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuesta, M., Valor, C.: Fostering corporate social responsability through public initiative: from the EU to the Spanish case. J Bus Ethics 55, 275–293 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. CuiQing, J., Kun, L., Hsinchun, Ch., Yong, D.: Analyzing market performance via social media: a case study of a banking industry crisis. Sci. China Inf. Sci., pending issue: 1–18

  18. Damanpour, F., Gopalakrishnan, S.: The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovation in organizations. J Manag Stud 38(1), 45–65 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dart, R.: Being“Business-Like” in a nonprofit organization: a grounded and inductive typology. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 33(2), 290–310 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De Andrés, J., Lorca, P., Martínez, A.B..: Economic and financial factors for the adoption and visibility effects of Web accessibility. The case of European banks. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 60(9), 1769–1780 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. De Andrés, J., Lorca, P., Martínez, A.B..: Factors influencing Web accessibility of big listed firms: an international study. Online Inf Rev 34(1), 75–97 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dewett, T., Jones, G.R.: The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment. J Manag 27, 313–346 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Downs, A.: Inside bureaucracy. Little Brown and Company, Boston (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Falck, O., Heblich, S.: Corporate social responsibility: doing good by doing well. Bus Horiz 50, 247–254 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Falk, R.F., Miller, N.B.: A primer for soft modelling. The University of Akron Press, Akron (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fay, M.P., Proschan, M.A.: Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules. Stat Surv 4, 1–39 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18, 39–50 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Frame, W.S., White, L.J.: Empirical studies of financial innovation: lots of talk, little action? J Econ Lit 42(1), 116–144 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Frankelius, P.: Questioning two myths in innovation literature. J High Technol Manag Res 20(1), 40–51 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. García-Cestona, M., Surroca, J.: Multiple goals and ownership structure: effects on the performance of Spanish savings banks. Eur J Oper Res 187, 582–599 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Goerke, J.: Taking the quantum leap: nonprofits are now in business. an Australian perspective. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 8(4), 317–327 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hackett, S., Parmanto, B.: A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: higher education web sites. Internet Res 15(3), 281–294 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hackett, S., Parmanto, B.: Homepage not enough when evaluating web site accessibility. Internet Res 19(1), 78–87 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.R.L.: Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall International, Upper Saddle River (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Harper, S., Chen, A.Q.: Web accessibility guidelines. A lesson from the evolving Web. World Wide Web 15, 61–88 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Henry, S.L. (Ed.): Developing a Web accessibility business case for your organization. World Wide Web consortium (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), available online at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/ (accessed 10 March 2014)

  37. Ho, S.H., Ko, Y.Y.: Effects of self-service technology on customer value and customer readiness: the case of internet banking. Internet Res 18(4), 427–446 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Jaskyte, K.: Predictors of administrative and technological innovations in non-profit organizations. Public Adm Rev 71, 77–86 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaiser, H.F.: The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 20, 141–151 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kuzma, J.M.: Accessibility design issues with UK e-government sites. Gov Inf Q 27, 141–146 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Li, S.H., Yen, D.C., Lu, W.H., Lin, T.L.: Migrating from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0—a comparative study based on Web content accessibility guidelines in Taiwan. Comput Hum Behav 28(1), 87–96 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Loehlin, J.C.: Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Psychology Press (2004)

  43. Mahmud, J., Ramakrishnan, I.V.: Transaction models for Web accessibility. World Wide Web 15, 383–408 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Martin, A., Rossi, G., Cechich, A., Gordillo, S.: Engineering accessible Web applications. An aspect-oriented approach. World Wide Web 13, 419–440 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Martínez, A.B.., Juan, A., Álvarez, D., Suárez, M.C.: WAB*: a quantitative metric based on WAB. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE 2009), LNCS 5648, pp. 485–488. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Matten, D., Moon, J.: Implicit and explicit CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 33(2), 404–424 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., Schneeweis, T.: Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad Manag J 31(2), 854–872 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nietzio, A., Strobbe, C., Velleman, E.: The Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM) 1.2 for WCAG 1.0. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, LNCS 5105, pp. 394–401. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nunnally, J.: Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Olalere, A., Lazar, J.: Accessibility of U.S. federal government home pages: section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements. Gov Inf Q 28, 303–309 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Olson, D., Zoubi, T.A.: Efficiency and bank profitability in MENA countries. Emerg Mark Rev 12(2), 94–110 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Parmanto, B., Zeng, X.: Metric for Web accessibility evaluation. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 56(13), 1394–1404 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Parnell, J.A.: Performance’s influence on strategic change: a longitudinal assessment. Scand J Manag 14(1/2), 19–36 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pemberton, S.: Accessibility is for everyone. ACM Interact 10(6), 4–5 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pérez-Ruiz, A., Rodríguez del Bosque, I.: La imagen de responsabilidad de social corporativa en un contexto de crisis económica: el caso del sector financiero en España. Univ Bus Rev 33, 14–29 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Qureshi, I., Compeau, D.: Assessing between-group differences in information systems research: a comparison of covariance- and component- based SEM. MIS Q 31(1), 197–214 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ray, A.W., Ray, J.J.: Strategic benefits to SMEs from third party web services: an action research analysis. J Strateg Inf Syst 15, 273–291 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Roberts, J.B., Crittenden, L.A., Crittenden, J.C.: Students with disabilities and online learning: a cross-institutional study of perceived satisfaction with accessibility compliance and services. Internet High Educ 14, 242–250 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Serrano, C., Mar-Molinero, C., Chaparro, F.: Spanish savings banks: a view on intangibles. Knowl Manag Res Pract 2, 103–117 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Shaikh, A.A., Karjaluoto, H.: Mobile banking adoption: a literature review. Telematics Inform 32(1), 129–142 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Slatin, J.M., Rush, S.: Maximum accessibility: making your Web site more usable for everyone. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tenenhaus, M., Esposito Vinzi, V., Chatelinc, Y.-M., Lauro, C.: PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48(1), 159–205 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Thatcher, J., Burks, M.R., Heilmann, C., Henry, S.L., Kirkpatrick, A., Lauke, P.H., Lawson, B., Regan, B., Rutter, R., Urban, M., Waddell, C.: Web accessibility: Web standards and regulatory compliance. Apress, Berkeley (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Thorp, J., Henry, S.L. (Eds.): Introduction to Web accessibility. World Wide Web consortium (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), available online at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php (accessed 10 March 2014)

  65. Tortosa-Ausina, E.: Nontraditional activities and bank efficiency revisited: a distributional analysis for Spanish financial institutions. J Econ Bus 55(4), 371–395 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Trujillo-Ponce, A.: What determines the profitability of banks? Evidence from Spain. Account Finance 53(2), 561–586 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Vigo, M., Brajnik, G.: Automatic web accessibility metrics: where we are and where we can go. Interact Comput 23(2), 141–146 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. WAI (Web Accessibility Initiative). Introduction to Web accessibility. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php (accessed 20 July 2014)

  69. WAI (Web Accessibility Initiative). WCAG 2.0 FAQ. http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/wcag2faq.html (accessed 20 July 2014)

  70. Yu, D., Parmanto, B.: U.S. State government websites demonstrate better in terms of accessibility compared to federal government and commercial websites. Gov Inf Q 28(4), 484–490 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zeng, X.: Evaluation and enhancement of Web content accessibility for persons with disabilities, PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (2004)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Lorca.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 54.0 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lorca, P., de Andrés, J. & Martínez, A.B. Does Web accessibility differ among banks?. World Wide Web 19, 351–373 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-014-0314-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-014-0314-0

Keywords

Navigation