Skip to main content
Log in

LUNARES: lunar crater exploration with heterogeneous multi robot systems

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The LUNARES (Lunar Crater Exploration Scenario) project emulates the retrieval of a scientific sample from within a permanently shadowed lunar crater by means of a heterogeneous robotic system. For the accomplished earth demonstration scenario, the Shakelton crater at the lunar south pole is taken as reference. In the areas of permanent darkness within this crater, samples of scientific interest are expected. For accomplishment of such kind of mission, an approach of a heterogeneous robotic team consisting of a wheeled rover, a legged scout as well as a robotic arm mounted on the landing unit was chosen. All robots act as a team to reach the mission goal. To prove the feasibility of the chosen approach, an artificial lunar crater environment has been established to test and demonstrate the capabilities of the robotic systems. Figure 1 depicts the systems in the artificial crater environment. For LUNARES, preexisting robots were used and modified were needed in order to integrate all subsystems into a common system control. A ground control station has been developed considering conditions of a real mission, requiring information of autonomous task execution and remote controlled operations to be displayed for human operators. The project successfully finished at the end of 2009. This paper reviews the achievements and lessons learned during the project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abad-Manterola P, Burdick JW, Nesnas IAD, Chinchali S, Fuller C, Zhou X (2010) Axel rover paddle wheel design, efficiency, and sinkage on deformable terrain. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’10), Anchorage, Alaska, USA

  2. Arnold JR (1979) Ice in the lunar polar regions. J Geophys Res 84(B10): 5659–5668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartlett P, Wettergreen D, Whittaker WL (2008) Design of the scarab rover for mobility and drilling in the lunar cold traps. In: International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space

  4. Bartsch S, Cordes F, Haase S, Planthaber S, Roehr TM (2010) Performance evaluation of an heterogeneous multi-robot system for lunar crater exploration. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (iSAIRAS-10), August 29–September 1, Sapporo, Japan

  5. Coates AJ (1999) Limited by cost: the case against humans in the scientific exploration of space. Earth Moon Planets 87(3): 213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cordes F, Bindel D, Lange C, Kirchner F (2010) Towards a modular reconfigurable heterogenous multi-robot exploration system. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (iSAIRAS’10), pp 38–45

  7. Cordes F, Planthaber S, Ahrns I, Birnschein T, Bartsch S, Kirchner F (2009) Cooperating reconfigurable robots for autonomous planetary sample return missions. In: ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots (ReMAR-2009), London, United Kingdom

  8. Cormen TH, Stein C, Rivest RL, Leiserson CE (2001) Introduction to algorithms. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dettmann A, Haase S, Kirchner F (2010) Automatic robot supervision within a lunar crater environment. In: Joint 41st International Symposium on Robotics and 6th German Conference on Robotics (ISR Robotik-2010), June 7-9, Munich, Germany

  10. Estlin T, Gaines D, Fisher F, Castano R (2005) Coordinating multiple rovers with interdependent science objectives. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Utrecht, Netherlands. doi:10.1145/1082473.1082607

  11. Estlin T, Gray A, Gray E, Mann T, Castaño R, Rabideau G, Chien S, Mjolsness E (1999) An integrated system for multi-rover scientific exploration. In: Proceedings of AAAIć699

  12. Feldman WC, Maurice S, Binder AB, Barraclough BL, Elphic RC, Lawrence DJ (1998) Fluxes of fast and epithermal neutrons from lunar prospector: evidence for water ice at the lunar poles. Science 281: 1496–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrarini L, Carpanzano E (1999) Reference models for the supervision and control of advancedindustrial manipulators. Proc Am Control Conf 4:2440–2444. doi:10.1109/ACC.1999.786486

  14. Fiorio C, Gustedt J (1996) Two linear time union-find strategies for image processing. Theo Comput Sci 154(2): 165–181

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen N, Ostermeier A (2001) Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evol Comput 9(2): 159–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoepflinger MA, Remy CD, Hutter M, Spinello L, Siegwart R (2010) Haptic terrain classification for legged robots. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’10), Anchorage, Alaska, USA

  17. Huntsberger T (1997) Autonomous multirover system for complex planetary surface retrieval operations. In: Proceedings of Sensor Fusion and Decentralized Control in Autonomous Robotic Systems, pp 221–227

  18. Huntsberger T, Pirjanian P, Trebi-ollennu A, Nayar HD, Ganino AJ, Garrett M, Member A, Joshi SS, Schenker PS (2003) Campout: A control architecture for tightly coupled coordination of multi-robot systems for planetary surface exploration. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 33(5): 550–559. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2003.817398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huntsberger T, Stroupe A, Aghazarian H, Garrett M, Younse P, Powell M (2007) Tressa: teamed robots for exploration and science on steep areas: field reports. J Field Robot 24(11-12): 1015–1031. doi:10.1002/rob.v24:11/12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Klaassen B, Linnemann R, Spenneberg D, Kirchner F (2002) Biomimetric walking robot scorpion: control and modeling. Robot Auton Syst J 41: 69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. NASA (2010) Mini-RF exploring the lunar poles. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/Mini-RF/multimedia/feature_ice_like_deposits.html

  22. NASA (2009) Mission update Lcross impact data indicates water on moon. NASA Homepage. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/main/prelim_water_results.html

  23. Nozette S, Lichtenberg C, Spudis P, Bonner R, Ort W, Malaret E, Robinson M, Shoemaker EM (1996) The clementine bistatic radar experiment. Science 274: 1495–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roehr TM, Cordes F, Ahrns I, Kirchner F (2010) Cooperative docking procedures for a lunar mission. In: Joint 41st International Symposium on Robotics and 6th German Conference on Robotics (ISR Robotik-2010), June 7-9, Munich, Germany

  25. Sanderson AC, Weiss LE (1983) Adaptive visual servo control of robots. Robot Vision pp 107–116

  26. Schenker PS, Huntsberger TL, Pirjanian P, Baumgartner E, Aghazarian H, Trebi-ollennu A, Leger PC, Cheng Y, Backes PG, Tunstel EW, Propulsion J, Dubowsky LS (2001) Robotic automation for space: planetary surface exploration, terrain-adaptive mobility, and multi-robot cooperative tasks. In: Hall DPCEL (ed) Intelligent robots and computer vision XX: algorithms, techniques, and active vision, Boston, MA, USA, vol 4572, pp 12–28. doi:10.1117/12.444181

  27. Schwendner J, Grimminger F, Bartsch S, Kaupisch T, Yuksel M, Bresser A, Akpo JB, Dieterle A, Schmidt S, Seydel M, Kirchner F (2009) Cesar: a lunar crater exploration and sample return robot. In: Intelligent robots and systems, IROS 2009, St. Louis. ISBN:978-1-4244-3803-7

  28. Spenneberg D, Albrecht M, Backhaus T (2005) M.O.N.S.T.E.R.: A new behavior-based microkernel for mobile robots. In: ECMR 2005

  29. Spenneberg D, Kirchner F (2007) Climbing and walking robots towards new applications. The bio-inspired SCORPION robot: design, control & lessons learned. I-Tech Education and Publishing

  30. Thrun S, Fox D, Burgard W, Dellaert F (2001) Robust monte carlo localization for mobile robots. Artif Intell 128(1-2): 99–141

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Visentin G. Autonomy in ESA Planetary Robotics Missions. http://www.scitech.ac.uk/Resources/PDF/GianfrancoVisentin.pdf

  32. Watson K, Murray B, Brown H (1961) On the possible presence of ice on the moon. J Geo Res 66(5): 1588–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wettergreen D, Jonak D, Kohanbash D, Moreland SJ, Spiker S, Teza J, Whittaker WRL (2009) Design and experimentation of a rover concept for lunar crater resource survey. In: 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Cordes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cordes, F., Ahrns, I., Bartsch, S. et al. LUNARES: lunar crater exploration with heterogeneous multi robot systems. Intel Serv Robotics 4, 61–89 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-010-0081-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-010-0081-4

Keywords

Navigation