Skip to main content
Log in

Design of an anthropomorphic dual-arm robot with biologically inspired 8-DOF arms

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From the perspective of kinematics, dual-arm manipulation in robots differs from single-arm manipulation in that it requires high dexterity in a specific region of the manipulator’s workspace. This feature has motivated research on the specialized design of manipulators for dual-arm robots. These recently introduced robots often utilize a shoulder structure with a tilted angle of some magnitude. The tilted shoulder yields better kinematic performance for dual-arm manipulation, such as a wider common workspace for each arm. However, this method tends to reduce total workspace volume, which results in lower kinematic performance for single-arm tasks in the outer region of the workspace. To overcome this trade-off, the authors of this study propose a design for a dual-arm robot with a biologically inspired four degree-of-freedom shoulder mechanism. This study analyzes the kinematic performance of the proposed design and compares it with that of a conventional dual-arm robot from the perspective of workspace and single-/dual-arm manipulability. The comparative analysis revealed that the proposed structure can significantly enhance single- and dual-arm kinematic performance in comparison with conventional dual-arm structures. This superior kinematic performance was verified through experiments, which showed that the proposed method required shorter settling time and trajectory-following performance than the conventional dual-arm robot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asfour T, Regenstein K, Azad P, Schröder J, Bierbaum A, Vahrenkamp N, Dillmann R (2006) ARMAR-III: an integrated humanoid platform for sensory-motor control. In: IEEE-RAS Int. Conf. Humanoid Robots, pp 169–175

  2. Do HM, Park C, Kyung J-H (2012) Dual arm robot for packaging and assembling of IT products. In: Int. conf. automation science and engineering (CASE), pp 1067–1070

  3. Hirose M, Ogawa K (2007) Honda humanoid robots development. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1850):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park I-W, Kim J-Y, Oh J-H (2005) Mechanical design of humanoid robot platform KHR-3 (KAIST Humanoid Robot 3: HUBO). In: IEEE-RAS int. conf. humanoid robots, pp 321–326

  5. Oh J-H, Hanson D, Kim W-S, Han IY, Kim J-Y, Park I-W (2006) Design of android type humanoid robot Albert HUBO. In: IEEE/RSJ int. conf. intelligent robots and systems, pp 1428–1433

  6. Lo S-Y, Huang H-P (2016) Realization of sign language motion using a dual-arm/hand humanoid robot. Intell Serv Robot 9(4):333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaneko K, Harada K, Kanehiro F, Miyamori G, Akachi K (2008) Humanoid robot HRP-3. In: IEEE/RSJ int. conf. intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 2471–2478

  8. Kaneko K, Kanehiro F, Morisawa M, Akachi K, Miyamori G, Hayashi A, Kanehira N (2011) Humanoid robotics platform with lightweight and slim body. In: IEEE/RSJ int. conf. intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 4400–4407

  9. Bagheri M, Ajoudani A, Lee J, Caldwell DG, Tsagarakis NG (2015) Kinematic analysis and design considerations for optimal base frame arrangement of humanioid shoulders. In: IEEE int. conf. robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 2710–2715

  10. Borst C et al (2009) Rollin’ Justin-mobile platform with variable base. In: IEEE int. conf. robotics and automation, pp 1597–1598

  11. Loughlin C, Albu-Schäffer A, Haddadin S, Ott C, Stemmer A, Wimböck T, Hirzinger G (2007) The DLR lightweight robot: design and control concepts for forbots in human environments. Ind Robot Int J 34(5):376–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goehler C (2007) Design of a humanoid shoulder-elbow complex. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame

  13. Yoshikawa T (1985) Manipulability of robotic mechanisms. Int J Robot Res 4(2):3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee S (1989) Dual redundant arm configuration optimization with task-oriented dual arm manipulatability. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 5(1):78–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi M-H, Lee M-Y, Lee B-H (1990) On the manipulability measure of dual arm. In: Korea Automatic Control Conference (KACC), pp 1156–1161

  16. Choi M-H, Lee B-H, Ko M-S (1993) Force ellipsoid and manipulability ellipsoid of two cooperating robots. J KIEE 6(2):52–60

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bae J-H, Park S-W, Par J-H, Baeg M-H, Kim D, Oh S-R (2012) Development of a low cost anthropomorphic robot hand with high capability. In: IEEE/RSJ int. conf. intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 4776–4782

  18. Bae J-H, Park S-W, Kim D, Baeg M-H, Oh S-R (2012) A grasp strategy with the geometric centroid of a groped object shape derived from contact spots. In: IEEE int. conf. robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 3798–3804

  19. Cheah C-C (2008) Task-space PD control of robot manipulators: unified analysis and duality property. Int J Robot Res 27(10):1152–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sciavicco L, Siciliano B (1996) Modeling and control of robot manipulators. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JT, Lee J, Kim H, Seo J, Chon S-U, Park B, Park S, Cho J (2016) Method for improving the position precision of a hydraulic robot arm: dual virtual springdamper controller. Intell Serv Robot 9(2):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arimoto S, Sekimoto M, Hashiguchi H, Ozawa R (2005) Natural resolution of ill-posedness of inverse kinematics for redundant robots: a challenge to Bernstein’s degrees-of-freedom problem. Adv Robot 19(4):401–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arimoto S (1996) Control theory of nonlinear mechanical systems. Oxford University Press, Inc., Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Bae J-H, Park J-H, Oh Y, Kim D, Choi Y, Yang W (2015) Task space control considering passive muscle stiffness for redundant robotic arms. Intell Serv Robot 8(2):93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1A6A3A04012911).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-Hun Bae.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (mp4 18429 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (mp4 20707 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, DH., Park, H., Park, JH. et al. Design of an anthropomorphic dual-arm robot with biologically inspired 8-DOF arms. Intel Serv Robotics 10, 137–148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-017-0215-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-017-0215-z

Keywords

Navigation