Skip to main content
Log in

Class-Driven Non-Negative Matrix Factorization for Image Representation

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) is a useful technique to learn a parts-based representation by decomposing the original data matrix into a basis set and coefficients with non-negative constraints. However, as an unsupervised method, the original NMF cannot utilize the discriminative class information. In this paper, we propose a semi-supervised class-driven NMF method to associate a class label with each basis vector by introducing an inhomogeneous representation cost constraint. This constraint forces the learned basis vectors to represent better for their own classes but worse for the others. Therefore, data samples in the same class will have similar representations, and consequently the discriminability in new representations could be boosted. Some experiments carried out on several standard databases validate the effectiveness of our method in comparison with the state-of-the-art approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duda R O, Hart P E, Stork D G. Pattern Classification (2nd edition). New York: John Wiley, 2001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin Q L, Sheng B, Shen Y, Xie Z F, Chen Z H, Ma L Z. Fast image correspondence with global structure projection. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2012, 27(6): 1281-1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ping Y, Tian Y J, Zhou Y J, Yang Y X. Convex decomposition based cluster labeling method for support vector clustering. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2012, 27(2): 428-442.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee D D, Seung H S. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 1999, 401(6755): 788-791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palmer S E. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 1977, 9(4): 441-474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wachsmuth E, Oram M W, Perrett D I. Recognition of objects and their component parts: Responses of single units in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Cerebral Cortex, 1994, 4(5): 509-522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li S Z, Hou X W, Zhang H J, Cheng Q S. Learning spatially localized, parts-based representation. In CVPR, December 2001, Volume 1, pp.207-212.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xu W, Liu X, Gong Y. Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization. In Proc. the 26th ACM SIGIR, July 28-August 1, 2003, pp.267-273.

  9. Xu W, Gong Y. Document clustering by concept factorization. In Proc. the 27th ACM SIGIR, July 2004, pp.202-209.

  10. Cai D, He X, Han J, Huang T S. Graph regularized non-negative matrix factorization for data representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2011, 33(8): 1548-1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Belkin M, Niyogi P, Sindhwani V. Manifold regularization: A geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2006, 7: 2399-2434.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Basu S, Banerjee A, Mooney R. Semi-supervised clustering by seeding. In Proc. the 19th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, July 2002, pp.19-26.

  13. Liu H F, Wu Z H, Li X L, Cai D, Huang T S. Constrained non-negative matrix factorization for image representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2012, 34(7): 1299-1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang J, Wang J, Huang T. Learning the sparse representation for classification. In Proc. ICME, July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee D D, Seung H S. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2000, 13: 556-562.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dempster A P, Laird N M, Rubin D B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 1977, 39(1): 1-38.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Li F F, Fergus R, Perona P. Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2007, 106(1): 59-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Loász L, Plummer M. Matching Theory. American Mathematical Society, 2009.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yao Zhao.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by the National Basic Research 973 Program of China under Grant No. 2012CB316400, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61025013, 61172129, 61210006, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China under Grant No. 2012JBZ012, and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of China under Grant No. IRT201206.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, YH., Zhu, ZF., Zhao, Y. et al. Class-Driven Non-Negative Matrix Factorization for Image Representation. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 28, 751–761 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-013-1374-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-013-1374-9

Keywords

Navigation