Abstract
In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework to guide the design of a computer-supported collaborative learning intervention to help students learn how to improve collaborative knowledge building discourse at the level of the small group. The framework focuses on scripting individual and collective regulatory processes following collaboration. Individuals are required to evaluate their team’s chat transcripts against rubrics to score discussion quality. These theoretically supported rubrics provide individuals with concrete examples of desired communication processes. After this individual assessment, the team is prompted to discuss their individual scores, identify strengths and weaknesses of their collaborative discourse processes, and select strategies to improve the quality of their collaborative discussion in a future discussion session. To evaluate our framework, we created a prototype of an online system and asked students to use it over ten weeks as part of five discussion sessions. Participants included 37 students, divided into 13 teams, from an undergraduate online course in information sciences. We used quantitative and qualitative analysis techniques to examine students’ collaborative processes over time, with teams as the main unit of analysis. All teams followed the same general activities, but there were two different conditions for scripting individual reflections that preceded the collective sense-making activity: one (Future-thinking) focused on pushing individuals to pay attention to advice on how to improve existing processes in future sessions and another (Evidence-Based) pushed individuals to pay closer attention to the chat transcripts to provide evidence for their group process scores. Our results suggest (1) use of the framework can help students’ monitor and regulate collaborative processes and improve collaborative discourse over time and (2) the Evidence-Based condition can help students engage in higher quality reflective analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: a comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379.
Ball, L. J., Evans, J. S. B., & Dennis, I. (1994). Cognitive processes in engineering design: A longitudinal study. Ergonomics, 37(11), 1753–1786.
Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Borge, M., & Carroll, J. M. (2010). Using collaborative activity as a means to explore student performance and understanding. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 1, Full Papers (pp. 889–896). Chicago: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Borge, M., Ganoe, C., Shih, S., and Carroll, J. (2012). Patterns of team processes and breakdowns in information analysis tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1105–1114). New York: ACM.
Borge, M., & Carroll, J. M. (2014). Verbal equity, cognitive specialization, and performance. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 215–225). New York: ACM.
Borge, M., & White, B. Y. (2016). Toward the development of socio-metacognitive expertise: An approach to developing collaborative competence. Cognition and Instruction, 34(4), 323–360.
Borge, M., Ong, Y. S., & Rosé, C. P. (2015). Activity design models to support the development of high quality collaborative processes in online settings. In O. Lindwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschmann, P. Tchounikine, & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference 2015 Conference Proceedings Volume 1 (pp. 427–434). Gothenburg, Sweden: The International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Callaway, M. R., & Esser, J. K. (1984). Groupthink: Effects of cohesiveness and problem-solving procedures on group decision making. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 12(2), 157–164.
Cannon-Bowers, J., & Salas, E. (2014). Knowledge, skills, and attitudes. In H. O’Neal (Ed.), workforce readiness: Competencies and assessment (151‑174).
Carroll, J. M., Jiang, H., & Borge, M. (2014). Distributed collaborative homework activities in a problem-based usability engineering course. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 589–617.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 13(1991), 127–149.
Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Stout, R. J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42(1), 151–173.
De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L., & Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group in- teraction: Need for closure affects the con- tents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(4), 346–365.
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5–23.
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87.
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–352.
Fiore, S. M., Rosen, M. A., Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Salas, E., Letsky, M., & Warner, N. (2010). Toward an understanding of macrocognition in teams: Predicting processes in complex collaborative contexts. Human Factors, 52(2), 203–224.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66.
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.
Gabelica, C., van den Bossche, P., De Maeyer, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). The effect of team feedback and guided reflexivity on team performance change. Learning and Instruction, 34, 86–96.
Gress, C. L. Z., Fior, M., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 806–814.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174–180.
Hogan, K. (1999a). Thinking aloud together: a test of an intervention to foster students' collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1085–1109.
Hogan, K. (1999b). Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 855–882.
Hu, H., Real, E., Takamiya, K., Kang, M. G., Ledoux, J., Huganir, R. L., & Malinow, R. (2007). Emotion enhances learning via norepinephrine regulation of AMPA-receptor trafficking. Cell, 131(1), 160–173.
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2015). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. New York: WW Norton & Co..
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). Exploring socially shared regulation in the context of collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 267–286.
Jeong, H., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Yu, Y. (2014). An examination of CSCL methodological practices and the influence of theoretical frameworks 2005–2009. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(3), 305–334.
Kerr, N., & Tindale, S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 623–655.
Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 16–22.
Kozlowski, S., & Ilgen, D. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.
Kozlowski, S. W., Watola, D. J., Jensen, J. M., Kim, B. H., & Botero, I. C. (2009). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of dynamic team leadership. In S. Eduardo, G. F. Goodwin, & C. S. Burke (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 113–155). New York: Routledge.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121.
Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 12–18.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
McGrath, R. G. (1999a). Falling forward: real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13.
McGrath, R. (1999b). Falling forward: real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13–30.
Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 377–390.
Nesbit, P. L. (2012). The role of self-reflection, emotional management of feedback, and self-regulation processes in self-directed leadership development. Human Resource Development Review, 11(2), 203–226.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Civitas Books.
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers & Education, 61, 59–76.
Ong, Y. S., & Borge, M. (2016). Joint idea-building in online collaborative group discussions. In C. K. Looi, J. L. Polman, U. Cress, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2016, Volume 1 (pp. 266–273). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Ortony, A., Norman, D. A., & Revelle, W. (2004). The role of affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. In J.-M. Fellous & M. A. Arbib (Eds.), Who needs emotions? The brain meets the machine (pp. 173–202). New York: Oxford University Press.
Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2015). Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 29(1), 1–26.
Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Usability engineering: Scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale: Morgan Kaufmann.
Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). The development of executive attention: Contributions to the emergence of self-regulation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28(2), 573–594.
Salas, E., Fiore, S. M., & Letsky, M. P. (Eds.). (2013). Theories of team cognition: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. Routledge.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building commu- nities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249–268). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 361–382.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stahl, G. (2010). Guiding group cognition in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 255–258.
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3–4), 304–313.
Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421–447.
Stegmann, K., Mu, J., Gehlen-Baum, V., Fischer, F. (2011). The myth of over-scripting: Can novices be supported too much? In Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Hong Kong, July 2011.
Tully, K., & Bolshakov, V. Y. (2010). Emotional enhancement of memory: How norepinephrine enables synaptic plasticity. Molecular Brain, 3(1), 15.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
West, G. P. (2007). Collective cognition: When entrepreneurial teams, not individuals, make decisions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(1), 77–102.
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.
Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2009). Supporting self-regulated learning with cognitive tools. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 259–277). New York: Routledge.
Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, New Series, 330(6004), 686–688.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the members of the Collective Cognition and Design group at Penn State for all of their help. We would especially like to thank Hyeyeon Lee for her input and our undergraduate research assistants, Emily Hanson and Scott Cunningham, for their contributions to this project. Finally, we would like to thank the participating students for allowing us to examine their interactions and for giving us constructive, thoughtful feedback on the activities.
This research was supported by The National Science Foundation (IIS-1319445), awarded to Marcela Borge and Carolyn Rosé, the National Science Foundation (IIS-1546393) awarded to Carolyn Rosé, and the Center for Online Innovations in Learning (COIL) research and initiation grant awarded to Marcela Borge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borge, M., Ong, Y.S. & Rosé, C.P. Learning to monitor and regulate collective thinking processes. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 13, 61–92 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9270-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9270-5