Abstract
This paper studies the impact of the reference point on a hedger's decision based upon prospect theory and experimental evidence on how prior outcomes affect risky choice. The authors show that in the futures market, a hedger who does not adjust his reference point timely would increase his positions continually as his accumulated losses increase, and finally become a speculator. Numerical simulation results under the normal distribution also lend support to the results. The model can help explain why the hedging behavior of firms turns into speculative activities and can offer some new insights into hedging behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. R. Arkes and B. Catherine, The psychology of sunk cost, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 35(1): 124–140.
N. Barberis and R. Thaler, A survey of behavioral finance, National Bureau of Economic Reasearch, Inc., Working Paper, W9222, 2002.
J. Brockner, The escalation of commitment to a falling course of action: toward theoretical, progress, Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(1): 39–61.
U. Gneezy, A. Kapteyn, and J. Potters, Evaluation periods and asset prices in a market experiment, The Journal of Finance, 2003, 58(2): 821–837.
U. Gneezy and J. Potters, An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(2): 631–645.
B. M. Staw, Knee deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16(1): 27–44.
M. Weber and C. F. Camerer, The disposition effect in securities trading: An experimental analysis, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1998, 33: 167–184.
D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263–291.
H. Markowitz, The utility of wealth, Journal of Political Economics, 1952, 60(2): 151–158.
R. Thaler and J. Johnson, Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice, Management Science, 1990, 36: 643–660.
M. Weber and H. Zuchel, How do prior outcomes affect risk attitude? Comparing escalation of commitment and the house-money effect, Decision Analysis, 2005, 2(1): 30–43.
B. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg, and T. Post, Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004, 86(4): 973–987.
N. Barberis, M. Huang, and T. Santos, Prospect theory and asset prices, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, 116(1): 1–53.
F. Gomes, Portfolio choice and trading volume with loss-averse investors, Journal of Business, 2005, 78(2): 675–706.
D. Lien, A note on loss aversion and futures hedging, Journal of Futures Markets, 2001, 21(7): 681–692.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
*This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. 70221001.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Q., Li, Y. & Wang, S. FROM HEDGING TO SPECULATION—AN EXPLANATON BASED ON PROSPECT THEORY*. J Syst Sci Complex 21, 394–405 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-008-9121-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-008-9121-y