Skip to main content
Log in

A complex systems science perspective on wireless networks

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper targets a future world where all wireless networks are self-organising entities and in which the predominant mode of spectrum access is dynamic. The paper explores whether the behaviour of a collection of autonomous self-organising wireless systems can be treated as a complex system and whether complex systems science can shed light on the design and deployment of these networks. The authors focus on networks that self-organise from a frequency perspective to understand the behaviour of a collection of wireless self-organising nodes. Each autonomous network is modelled as a cell in a lattice and follows a simple set of self-organisation rules. Two scenarios are considered, one in which each cell is based on cellular automata and which provides an abstracted view of interference and a second in which each cell uses a self-organising technique which more accurately accounts for interference. The authors use excess entropy to measure complexity and in combination with entropy gain an understanding of the structure emerging in the lattice for the self-organising networks. The authors show that the self-organising systems presented here do exhibit complex behaviour. Finally, the authors look at the robustness of these complex systems and show that they are robust against changes in the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhao Q and Sadler B M, A survey of dynamic spectrum access, Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 2007, 24(3): 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akyildiz I F, Lee W Y, Vuran M C, and Mohanty S, Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/ cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey, Computer Networks, 2006, 50(13): 2127–2159.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell M, Complexity — A Guided Tour, Oxford University Press, 2011.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Onnela J P, Saramaki J, Hyvonen J, Szabo G, Lazer D, Kaski K, Kertesz J, and Barabási A L, Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(18): 7332–7336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hidalgo C A and Rodriguez-Sickert C, The dynamics of a mobile phone network, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2008, 387(12): 3017–3024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Candia J, Gonzalez M C, Wang P, Schoenharl T, Madey G, and Barabási A L, Uncovering individual and collective human dynamics from mobile phone records, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 2008, 41(22): 1–11.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang P, Gonzalez M, Hidalgo C A, and Barabási A L, Understanding the spreading patterns of mobile phone viruses, Science, 2009, 324(5930): 1071–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lloyd S, Measures of complexity: A nonexhaustive list, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2001, 21(4): 7–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez-Perez D, Chu X, Vasilakos A, and Claussen H, On distributed and coordinated resource allocation for interference mitigation in self-organizing LTE networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2013, 21(4): 1145–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmed F, Tirkkonen O, Peltomäki M, Koljonen J M, Yu C H, and Alava M, Distributed graph coloring for self-organization in LTE networks, Hindawi Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2010(5): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Herzen J, Merz R, and Thiran P, Distributed spectrum assignment for home WLANs, IEEE INFOCOM, 2013, 1573–1581.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Putzke M and Wietfeld C, Self-organizing fractional frequency reuse for femtocells using adaptive frequency hopping, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2013, 434–439.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Stolyar A and Viswanathan H, Self-organizing dynamic fractional frequency reuse in OFDMA systems, IEEE INFOCOM, 2008, 1573–1581.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Macaluso I, Doyle L, and Da Silva L, Learning Nash equilibria in distributed channel selection for frequency-agile radios, ECAI Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Telecommunications and Sensor Networks (WAITS), 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Macaluso I, Finn D, Ozgul B, and Da Silva L, Complexity of spectrum activity and benefits of reinforcement learning for dynamic channel selection, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2013, 31(11): 2237–2248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gavrilovska L, Atanasovski V, Macaluso I, and Da Silva L A, Learning and reasoning in cognitive radio networks, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2013, 15(4): 1761–1777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feldman D P and Crutchfield J P, Structural information in two-dimensional patterns: Entropy convergence and excess entropy, Physical Review E, 2003, 67(5): 1–9.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lopez-Ruiz R, Mancini H L, and Calbet X, A statistical measure of complexity, Physics Letters A, 1995, 209(5–6): 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ribeiro H V, Zunino L, Lenzi E K, Santoro P A, and Mendes R S, Complexity-entropy causality plane as a complexity measure for two-dimensional patterns, PloS one, 2012, 7(8): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Evolution Selects For and Against Complexity, Lecture of Networks & Complex Systems, Indiana University, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://vw.indiana.edu/talks-fall07/Yeager.pdf

  21. Beigy H and Meybodi M, A self-organizing channel assigment algorithm: A cellular learning automata approach, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003, 8(3): 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Beigy H and Meybodi M, Cellular learning automata based dynamic channel assignment algorithms, Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 2009, 8(3): 310–314.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Further Advancements for E-UTRA Physical Layer Aspects (Release 9), Mar. 2010, 3GPP TR 36.814 V9.0.0 (2010-03).

  24. Sutton P D, Nolan K E, and Doyle L E, Cyclostationary signatures in practical cognitive radio applications, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2008, 26(1): 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Macaluso.

Additional information

This paper was support by the Irish CTVR CSET under Grant No. 10/CE/I1853.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor TANG Xijin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Macaluso, I., Galiotto, C., Marchetti, N. et al. A complex systems science perspective on wireless networks. J Syst Sci Complex 29, 1034–1056 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-016-4122-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-016-4122-8

Keywords

Navigation