Abstract
The paper targets a future world where all wireless networks are self-organising entities and in which the predominant mode of spectrum access is dynamic. The paper explores whether the behaviour of a collection of autonomous self-organising wireless systems can be treated as a complex system and whether complex systems science can shed light on the design and deployment of these networks. The authors focus on networks that self-organise from a frequency perspective to understand the behaviour of a collection of wireless self-organising nodes. Each autonomous network is modelled as a cell in a lattice and follows a simple set of self-organisation rules. Two scenarios are considered, one in which each cell is based on cellular automata and which provides an abstracted view of interference and a second in which each cell uses a self-organising technique which more accurately accounts for interference. The authors use excess entropy to measure complexity and in combination with entropy gain an understanding of the structure emerging in the lattice for the self-organising networks. The authors show that the self-organising systems presented here do exhibit complex behaviour. Finally, the authors look at the robustness of these complex systems and show that they are robust against changes in the environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhao Q and Sadler B M, A survey of dynamic spectrum access, Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 2007, 24(3): 79–89.
Akyildiz I F, Lee W Y, Vuran M C, and Mohanty S, Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/ cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey, Computer Networks, 2006, 50(13): 2127–2159.
Mitchell M, Complexity — A Guided Tour, Oxford University Press, 2011.
Onnela J P, Saramaki J, Hyvonen J, Szabo G, Lazer D, Kaski K, Kertesz J, and Barabási A L, Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(18): 7332–7336.
Hidalgo C A and Rodriguez-Sickert C, The dynamics of a mobile phone network, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2008, 387(12): 3017–3024.
Candia J, Gonzalez M C, Wang P, Schoenharl T, Madey G, and Barabási A L, Uncovering individual and collective human dynamics from mobile phone records, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 2008, 41(22): 1–11.
Wang P, Gonzalez M, Hidalgo C A, and Barabási A L, Understanding the spreading patterns of mobile phone viruses, Science, 2009, 324(5930): 1071–1076.
Lloyd S, Measures of complexity: A nonexhaustive list, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2001, 21(4): 7–8.
Lopez-Perez D, Chu X, Vasilakos A, and Claussen H, On distributed and coordinated resource allocation for interference mitigation in self-organizing LTE networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2013, 21(4): 1145–1158.
Ahmed F, Tirkkonen O, Peltomäki M, Koljonen J M, Yu C H, and Alava M, Distributed graph coloring for self-organization in LTE networks, Hindawi Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2010(5): 1–10.
Herzen J, Merz R, and Thiran P, Distributed spectrum assignment for home WLANs, IEEE INFOCOM, 2013, 1573–1581.
Putzke M and Wietfeld C, Self-organizing fractional frequency reuse for femtocells using adaptive frequency hopping, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2013, 434–439.
Stolyar A and Viswanathan H, Self-organizing dynamic fractional frequency reuse in OFDMA systems, IEEE INFOCOM, 2008, 1573–1581.
Macaluso I, Doyle L, and Da Silva L, Learning Nash equilibria in distributed channel selection for frequency-agile radios, ECAI Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Telecommunications and Sensor Networks (WAITS), 2012.
Macaluso I, Finn D, Ozgul B, and Da Silva L, Complexity of spectrum activity and benefits of reinforcement learning for dynamic channel selection, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2013, 31(11): 2237–2248.
Gavrilovska L, Atanasovski V, Macaluso I, and Da Silva L A, Learning and reasoning in cognitive radio networks, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2013, 15(4): 1761–1777.
Feldman D P and Crutchfield J P, Structural information in two-dimensional patterns: Entropy convergence and excess entropy, Physical Review E, 2003, 67(5): 1–9.
Lopez-Ruiz R, Mancini H L, and Calbet X, A statistical measure of complexity, Physics Letters A, 1995, 209(5–6): 321–326.
Ribeiro H V, Zunino L, Lenzi E K, Santoro P A, and Mendes R S, Complexity-entropy causality plane as a complexity measure for two-dimensional patterns, PloS one, 2012, 7(8): 1–9.
Evolution Selects For and Against Complexity, Lecture of Networks & Complex Systems, Indiana University, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://vw.indiana.edu/talks-fall07/Yeager.pdf
Beigy H and Meybodi M, A self-organizing channel assigment algorithm: A cellular learning automata approach, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003, 8(3): 119–126.
Beigy H and Meybodi M, Cellular learning automata based dynamic channel assignment algorithms, Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 2009, 8(3): 310–314.
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Further Advancements for E-UTRA Physical Layer Aspects (Release 9), Mar. 2010, 3GPP TR 36.814 V9.0.0 (2010-03).
Sutton P D, Nolan K E, and Doyle L E, Cyclostationary signatures in practical cognitive radio applications, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2008, 26(1): 13–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper was support by the Irish CTVR CSET under Grant No. 10/CE/I1853.
This paper was recommended for publication by Editor TANG Xijin.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macaluso, I., Galiotto, C., Marchetti, N. et al. A complex systems science perspective on wireless networks. J Syst Sci Complex 29, 1034–1056 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-016-4122-8
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-016-4122-8