Skip to main content
Log in

Observability Analysis and Navigation Algorithm for Distributed Satellites System Using Relative Range Measurements

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of navigation for the distributed satellites system using relative range measurements is investigated. Firstly, observability for every participating satellites is analyzed based on the nonlinear Keplerian model containing J2 perturbation and the nonlinear measurements. It is proven that the minimum number of tracking satellites to assure the observability of the distributed satellites system is three. Additionally, the analysis shows that the J2 perturbation and the nonlinearity make little contribution to improve the observability for the navigation. Then, a quasi-consistent extended Kalman filter based navigation algorithm is proposed, which is quasi-consistent and can provide an online evaluation of the navigation precision. The simulation illustrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed navigation algorithm for the distributed satellites system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schetter T, Campbell M, and Surka D, Multiple agent-based autonomy for satellite constellations, Artificial Intelligence, 2003, 145: 147–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Norma M and Heinz N I, Agent-based artificial immune system model for the detection of faults in a distributed satellite system, Proceedings of the First AESS European Conference on Satellite Telecommunications (ESTEL), Rome, 2012, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tapley B D, Ries J C, Davis G W, et al., Precision orbit determination for TOPEX/POSEIDON, Journal of Geophysical Research, Dec. 1994, 99(C12): 24383–24404.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kang W, Ross I M, Pham K, et al., Autonomous observability of networked multisatellite systems, Journal of Gudance, Control, and Dynamics, 2009, 32(3): 869–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Markley F L, Autonomous navigation using landmark and intersatellite data, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Conference, Seattle, WA, 1984.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Psiaki M L, Autonomous low-Earth-orbit determination from magnetometer and sun sensor data, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1999, 22(2): 296–302.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Long A C, Leung D, Folta D, et al., Autonomous navigation of high-Earth satellites using celestial objects and Doppler measurements, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Denver, CO, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Y and Liu L, Orbit determination using satellite-to-satellite tracking data, Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2001, 1(3): 281–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grechkoseev A K, Study of observability of motion of an orbital group of navigation space system using intersatellite range measurements I, Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 2011, 50(2): 293–308.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Grechkoseev A K, Study of observability of motion of an orbital group of navigation space system using intersatellite range measurements II, Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 2011, 50(3): 472–482.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Huxel P J and Bishop R H, Navigation algorithms and observability analysis for formation flying missions, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2009, 32(4): 1218–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hill K and Born G H, Autonomous interplanetary orbit determination using satellite-to-satellite tracking, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2007, 30(3): 679–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hill K and Born G H, Autonomous orbit determination from lunar halo orbits using crosslink range, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45(3): 548–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Psiaki M L, Autonomous orbit determination for two spacecraft from relative position measurements, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1999, 22(2): 305–312.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Yim J R, Crassidis J L, and Junkins J L, Autonomous orbit navigation of two spacecraft system using relative line of sight vector measurements, Proceedings of the AAS Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Maui, Hawaii, USA, Feb. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shorshi G and Bar-Itzhack I Y, Satellite autonomous navigation and orbit determination using magnetometers, Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Decision and Control, Tucson, Arizona, 1992, 542–548.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wiegand M, Autonomous satellite navigation via Kalman filter of magnetometer data, Acta Astronautica, 1996, 38(4–8): 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bar-Shalom Y, Li X R, and Kirubarajan T, Estimation with Application to Tracking and Navigation, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang Y G, Xue W C, Huang Y, et al., The consistent extended Kalman filter, Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, Nanjing, China, July, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sabol C, Burns R, and McLaughlin C A, Satellite formation flying design and evolution, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2001, 38(2): 270–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clohessy W and Wiltshire R, Terminal guidance systems for satellite rendezvous, Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 1960, 27: 653–674.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Roy A E, Orbital Motion, 4th Edition, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Isidori A, Nonlinear Control Systems, 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag World Publishing Corp, London, 1995.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Eckart C and Young G, A principal axis transformation for non-hermitian matrices, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 1939, 45: 118–121.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Dochain D, Tali-Mammar N, and Babary J P, On modeling, monitoring and control of fixed bed bioreactors, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1997, 21(11): 1255–1266.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klema V C and Laub A J, The singular value decomposition: Its computation and some applications, IEEE Transaction Automatic Control, 1980, 25(2): 164–176.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Simon D, Optimal State Estimation — Kalman, H∞, and Nonlinear Approaches, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Huang.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant No. 2014CB845303 and the National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor HUANG Jie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, Q., Huang, Y. Observability Analysis and Navigation Algorithm for Distributed Satellites System Using Relative Range Measurements. J Syst Sci Complex 31, 1206–1226 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-018-6096-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-018-6096-1

Keywords

Navigation