Skip to main content
Log in

Transient Performance Improvement in Tracking Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Input Saturation

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the composite nonlinear feedback (CNF) control for a class of singleinput single-output nonlinear systems with input saturation to track a time varying reference target with good transient performance. The CNF control law consists of a tracking control law and a performance compensator. The tracking control law is designed to drive the output of the system to track the time varying reference target rapidly, while the performance compensator is used to reduce the overshoot caused by the tracking control law. The stability of the closed-loop system is established. The design procedure and the improvement of transient performance of the closed-loop system are illustrated with a numerical example and the controlled Van del Pol oscillator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bakkeheim J and Johansen T A, Transient performance, estimator resetting and filtering in nonlinear multiple model adaptive backstepping control, IEE Proceedings — Control Theory and Applications, 2006, 153(5): 536–545.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalkkuhl J, Johansen T A, and Ludemann J, Improved transient performance of nonlinear adaptive backstepping using estimator resetting based on multiple models, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2002, 47(1): 136–140.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakkeheim J, Smogeli O N, Johansen T A, et al., Improved transient performance by Lyapunovbased integrator reset of PI thruster control in extreme seas, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen M, Wu Q, Jiang C, et al., Guaranteed transient performance based control with input saturation for near space vehicles, Science China Information Sciences, 2014, 57(5): 1–12.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W and Wen C, Adaptive actuator failure compensation control of uncertain nonlinear systems with guaranteed transient performance, Automatica, 2010, 46(12): 2082–2091.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu T, Zhu J, and Sun Z, Adaptive neural control for a class of MIMO nonlinear systems with guaranteed transient performance, Advances in Neural Networks — ISNN 2006, Third International Symposium on Neural Networks, Chengdu, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yao B and Tomizuka M, Adaptive robust control of MIMO nonlinear systems with guaranteed transient performance, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xue W and Huang Y, Performance analysis of active disturbance rejection tracking control for a class of uncertain LTI systems, ISA Transactions, 2015, 58: 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xue W and Huang Y, Performance analysis of 2-DOF tracking control for a class of nonlinear uncertain systems with discontinuous disturbances, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2017: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Z, Cong B L, and Liu X D, A robust attitude control strategy with guaranteed transient performance via modified Lyapunov-based control and integral sliding mode control, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2014, 78(3): 2205–2218.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kosmatopoulos E B and Piovesan J L, CLF-based control design for unknown multiinput nonlinear systems with good transient performance, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2010, 55(11): 2635–2640.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Seshagiri S and Khalil H K, Robust output regulation of minimum phase nonlinear systems using conditional servocompensators, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2005, 15(2): 83–102.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin Z, Pachter M, and Banda S, Toward improvement of tracking performance nonlinear feedback for linear systems, International Journal of Control, 1998, 70(1): 1–11.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen B M, Lee T H, Peng K, et al., Composite nonlinear feedback control for linear systems with input saturation: Theory and an application, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2003, 48(3): 427–439.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lan W, Thum C K, and Chen B M, A hard-disk-drive servo system design using composite nonlinear feedback control with optimal nonlinear gain tuning methods, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2010, 57(5): 1735–1745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng G and Peng K, Robust composite nonlinear feedback control with application to a servo positioning system, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2007, 54(2): 1132–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng G, Peng K, Chen B M, et al., Improving transient performance in tracking general references using composite nonlinear feedback control and its application to high-speed XY-table positioning mechanism, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2007, 54(2): 1039–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lan W, Chen B M, and He Y, On improvement of transient performance in tracking control for a class of nonlinear systems with input saturation, Systems and Control Letters, 2006, 55(2): 132–138.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang J and Zhao J, On improving transient performance in tracking control for switched systems with input saturation via composite nonlinear feedback, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2015, 26(3): 509–518.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mobayen S, An LMI-based robust tracker for uncertain linear systems with multiple time-varying delays using optimal composite nonlinear feedback technique, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2015, 80(1–2): 917–927.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Mobayen S and Tchier F, Composite nonlinear feedback control technique for master/slave synchronization of nonlinear systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017, 80(3): 1731–1747.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Khalil H K, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice Hall, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Sussmann H J and Kokotovic P V, The peaking phenomenon and the global stabilization of nonlinear systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1991, 36(4): 424–440.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin Z, Low Gain Feedback, Springer, London, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Pappas G J, Lygeros J, and Godbole D N, Stabilization and tracking of feedback linearizable systems under input constraints, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Lu.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61374035 and 61733017.

This paper was recommended for publication by Guest Editor XIN Bin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, T., Lan, W. & Li, Z. Transient Performance Improvement in Tracking Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Input Saturation. J Syst Sci Complex 31, 200–214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-018-7362-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-018-7362-y

Keywords

Navigation