Skip to main content
Log in

Attack and Defense Strategies in Complex Networks Based on Game Theory

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the attack and defense strategies in complex networks, the authors propose a two-player zero-sum static game model with complete information which considers attack and defense strategies simultaneously. The authors assume that both the attacker and defender have two typical strategies: Targeted strategy and random strategy. The authors explore the Nash equilibriums of the attacker-defender game and demonstrate that when the attacker’s attack resources are not so significantly abundant as the defender?s resources, there exists a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium in both model networks and real-world networks, in which the defender protects the hub targets with large degrees preferentially, while the attacker prefers selecting the targets randomly. When the attack resources are much higher than defense resources, both the attacker and the defender adopt the targeted strategy in equilibriums. This paper provides a new theoretical framework for the study of attack and defense strategies in complex networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watts D and Strogatz S, Cllective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks, Nature, 1998, 393: 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barabási A L and Albert R, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509–512.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Albert R and Barabási A L, Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Reviews of Modern Physics, 2002, 26(1): xii.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Newman M, The structure and function of complex networks, SIAM Review, 2003, 45(2): 167–256.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, et al., Complex networks: Structure and dynamics, Physics Reports, 2006, 424: 175–308.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Albert R, Jeong H, and Barabási A L, Error and attack tolerance of complex networks, Nature, 2000, 406(6794): 378–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carlson J M and Doyle J, Complexity and robustness, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002, 99: 2538–2545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu J, Tan Y J, Deng H Z, et al., A robustness model of complex networks with tunable attack information parameter, Chinese Physics Letters, 2007, 24(7): 2138–2141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu J, Deng H Z, Tan Y J, et al., Vulnerability of complex networks under intentional attack with incomplete information, Journal of Physics A, 2007, 40(11): 2665.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu J, Barahona, Tan Y J, et al., Robustness of regular ring lattices based on natural connectivity, International Journal of Systems Science, 2011, 42(7): 1085–1092.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu J, Tan S Y, Liu Z, et al., Enhancing structural robustness of scale-free networks by information disturbance, Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 7559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang J W, Rong L L, Zhang L, et al., Attack vulnerability of scale-free networks due to cascading failures, Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2008, 387(26): 6671–6678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schneider C M, Moreira A, Andrade J, et al., Mitigation of malicious attacks on networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(10): 3838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao J, Barzel B, and Barabási A L, Universal resilience patterns in complex networks, Nature, 2016, 530(7590): 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu J G, Wang Z T, and Dang Y Z, Optimization of robustness and connectivity in complex networks, Modern Physics Letters B, 2006, 20(14): 815–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Valente A X, Sarkar A, and Stone H A, Two-peak and three-peak optimal complex networks, Physical Review Letters, 2004, 92(11): 118702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shargel B, Sayama H, Epstein I R, et al., Optimization of robustness and connectivity in complex networks, Physical Review Letters, 2003, 90(6): 068701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J G, Wang Z T, and Dang Y Z, Optimization of robustness of scale-free network to random and targeted attacks, Modern Physics Letters B, 2005, 19(16): 785–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peng G S, Tan S Y, Wu J, et al., Trade-offs between robustness and small-world effect in complex networks, Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 37317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayashi Y and Matsukubo J, Improvement of the robustness on geographical networks by adding shortcuts, Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2007, 380(1): 552–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y, Wu J, and Zou A Q, Effect of eliminating edges on robustness of scale-free networks under intentional attack, Chinese Physics Letters, 2010, 27(6): 068901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ash J and Newth D, Optimizing complex networks for resilience against cascading failure, Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2007, 380(1): 673–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeng A and Liu W P, Enhancing network robustness against malicious attacks, Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics, 2012, 85(6): 066130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Deng Y, Wu J, and Tan Y J, Optimal attack strategy of complex networks based on tabu search, Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2012, 442: 74–81.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Tan S Y, Wu J, Lü L Y, et al., Efficient network disintegration under incomplete information: The comic effect of link prediction, Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 22916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Holme P, Kim B J, Yoon C N, et al., Attack vulnerability of complex networks, Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics, 2002, 65(5): 056109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Levitin G, Optimal defense strategy against intentional attacks, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2007, 56(1): 148–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lü L Y, Chen D B, Ren X L, et al., Vital nodes identification in complex networks, Physics Reports, 2016, 650: 1–63.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu J G, Ren Z M, and Guo Q, Ranking the spreading influence in complex networks, Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2013, 392(18): 4154–4159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hausken K, Strategic defense and attack of complex networks, International Journal of Performability Engineering, 2009, 5(1): 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Osborne M J and Rubinstein A, A Course in Game Theory, MIT Press, MA, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Suo-Yi Tan and Yang Zhang for their helpful insights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Wu.

Additional information

This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71871217 and 71371185, and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province under Grant No. 2019JJ20019.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor SUN Jian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Deng, Y., Xiao, Y. et al. Attack and Defense Strategies in Complex Networks Based on Game Theory. J Syst Sci Complex 32, 1630–1640 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-019-7420-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-019-7420-0

Keywords

Navigation