Skip to main content
Log in

Foreign Trade Survey Data: Do They Help in Forecasting Exports and Imports?

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Business survey, which starts from the microeconomic level, is a widely used short-term forecasting tool in practice. In this study, the authors examine whether foreign trade survey data collected by China’s Ministry of Commerce would provide reliable forecasts of China’s foreign trade. The research procedure is designed from three perspectives including forecast information test, turning point forecast, and out-of-sample value forecast. First, Granger causality test detects whether survey data lead exports and imports. Second, business cycle analysis, a non-model based method, is performed. The authors construct composite indexes with business survey data to forecast turning points of foreign trade. Third, model-based numerical forecasting methods, including the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model with Exogenous Variables (ARIMAX) and the artificial neural networks (ANNs) models are estimated. Empirical results show that survey data granger cause imports and exports, the leading composite index provides signal for changes of trade cycles, and quantitative models including survey data generate more accurate forecasts than benchmark models. It is concluded that trade survey data has excellent predictive capabilities for imports and exports, which can offer some priorities for government policy-making and enterprise decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pesaran M H, Formation of inflation expectations in British manufacturing industries, The Economic Journal, 1985, 95(380): 948–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mogliani M, Darné O, and Pluyaud B, The new MIBA model: Real-time nowcasting of French GDP using the Banque de France’s monthly business survey, Economic Modelling, 2017, 64: 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yaprak A, An empirical study of the differences between small exporting and non-exporting US firms, International Marketing Review, 1985, 2(2): 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim S J, Intraday evidence of efficacy of 1991–2004 yen intervention by the Bank of Japan, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2007, 17(4): 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández-Villaverde J and Krueger D, Consumption over the life cycle: Facts from consumer expenditure survey data, Review of Economics and Statistics, 2007, 89(3): 552–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu L A, Wang S Y, and Lai K K, Forecasting Chinas foreign trade volume with a kernel-based hybrid econometrical ensemble learning approach, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2008, 21(1): 1–9.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng G H, Guo L, Jiang X M, et al., The impact of RMB’s appreciation on China’s trade, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 2006, 13(1): 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yue C J and Hua P, Does comparative advantage explains export patterns in China, China Economic Review, 2001, 13(23): 276–296.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lü Y H, Influence factors of China import and export trade flows: Empirical study on trade gravity model by panel data, On Economic Problems, 2009, 47: 777–780.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Du T, The international trade shocks and the China’s business cycle, Journal of International Trade, 2006, 12(2): 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nasreen S and Anwar S, Causal relationship between trade openness, economic growth and energy consumption: A panel data analysis of Asian countries, Energy Policy, 2014, 69: 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh T, Business cycle dynamics of economic growth in the OECD countries: Evidence from markov-switching model, Review of Economic Analysis, 2016, 8(1): 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stock J H and Watson M W, Indicators for dating business cycles: Cross-history selection and comparisons, American Economic Review, 2010, 100(2): 16–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stock J H and Watson M W, Estimating turning points using large data sets, Journal of Econometrics, 2014, 178: 368–381.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Fidrmuc J and Korhonen I, Meta-analysis of the business cycle correlation between the euro area and the CEECs, Journal of Comparative Economics, 2006, 34(3): 518–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton J D, A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1989, 57(2): 357–384.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Carriero A and Marcellino M, A comparison of methods for the construction of composite coincident and leading indexes for the UK, International Journal of Forecasting, 2007, 23(2): 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang J, Hassani H, Xie H, et al., Estimating multi-country prosperity index: A two-dimensional singular spectrum analysis approach, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2014, 27(1): 56–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shiskin J, The X-11 Variant of the Census Method II Seasonal Adjustment Program (No. 15), US Government Printing Office, 1965.

  20. Fukuda S I and Onodera T, A new composite index of coincident economic indicators in Japan: How can we improve forecast performances? International Journal of Forecasting, 2001, 17(3): 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stock J H and Watson M W, A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1993, 61(4): 783–820.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore G H, Statistical Indicators of Cyclical Revivals and Recessions, Business Cycle Indicators, Volume 1 (pp. 184–260), Princeton University Press, 1961.

  23. Moore G H and Klein P A, Forecasting Foreign Trade with Leading Indicators, Problems and Instruments of Business Cycle Analysis (pp. 157–181), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anggraeni W, Andri K B, Sumaryanto, et al, The performance of ARIMAX model and Vector Autoregressive (VAR) model in forecasting strategic commodity price in Indonesia, Procedia Computer Science, 2017, 124: 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Co H C and Boosarawongse R, Forecasting Thailand’s rice export: Statistical techniques vs. artificial neural networks, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2007, 53(4): 610–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tümer A E and Aytekin A, Forecasting gross domestic product per capita using artificial neural networks with non-economical parameters, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 512: 468–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Anggraeni W, Andri K B, and Mahananto F, The performance of ARIMAX model and vector autoregressive (VAR) model in forecasting strategic commodity price in Indonesia, Procedia Computer Science, 2017, 124: 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wangdi K, Singhasivanon P, Silawan T, et al, Development of temporal modelling for forecasting and prediction of malaria infections using time-series and ARIMAX analyses: A case study in endemic districts of Bhutan, Malaria Journal, 2010, 9(1): 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Granger C W, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica, 1969, 37(3): 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dong J, Dai W, and Li J, Exploring the linear and nonlinear causality between internet big data and stock markets, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2020, 33(3): 783–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang X, Lai K K, and Wang S, Did speculative activities contribute to high crude oil prices during 1993 to 2008? Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2009, 22(4): 636–646.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Frankel J and Saravelos G, Can leading indicators assess country vulnerability? Evidence from the 2008–2009 global financial crisis, Journal of International Economics, 2012, 87(2): 216–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Harvey A C and Jaeger A, Detrending, stylized facts and the business cycle, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1993, 8(3): 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Filardo A J, Business-cycle phases and their transitional dynamics, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1994, 12(3): 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wei Y J, Wei Q, Wang S Y, et al., A hybrid approach for studying the lead-lag relation- ships between China’s onshore and offshore exchange rates considering the impact of extreme events, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2017, 31(3): 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Maia A L S and de Carvalho F D A, Holt’s exponential smoothing and neural network models for forecasting interval-valued time series, International Journal of Forecasting, 2011, 27(3): 740–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Malik F and Nasereddin M, Forecasting output using oil prices: A cascaded artificial neural network approach, Journal of Economics and Business, 2006, 58(2): 168–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun Y, Zhang X, and Wang S, A hierarchical forecasting model for China’s foreign trade, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2020, 33(3): 743–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chiroma H, Abdulkareem S, and Herawan T, Evolutionary neural network model for West Texas intermediate crude oil price prediction, Applied Energy, 2015, 142: 266–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Ministry of Commerce, People’s Republic of China for providing data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yun Bai, Shouyang Wang or Xun Zhang.

Additional information

This paper was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71422015, 71988101, and the National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor FANG Ying.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, Y., Wang, S. & Zhang, X. Foreign Trade Survey Data: Do They Help in Forecasting Exports and Imports?. J Syst Sci Complex 35, 1839–1862 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-022-1015-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-022-1015-x

Keywords

Navigation