Skip to main content
Log in

Performance analysis and partner selection for cooperative diversity based on MQAM modulation

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An adaptive decode-and-forward (DF) cooperative diversity system based on quadrature modulation is proposed, in which each user is allowed to transmit its own and the partner’s data simultaneously via the in-phase and quadrature components of M-ary quadrature amplitude modulation (MQAM) constellation. Cooperative transmission in this way can avoid the bandwidth expansion in traditional cooperative systems. The closed form expression of the average bit error rate (BER) performance is derived in terms of the interuser and uplink channel statistics and a scalable power allocation factor, and further verified by simulations. Then the effect of equal power allocation (EPA) and optimal power allocation (OPA) algorithms on the system performance and the best partner location for a given user are investigated. Simulations show that the OPA algorithm offers considerable gains over EPA algorithm under practical non-ideal cooperative scenarios, and by joint consideration of partner selection and OPA, a simple yet near-optimal partner selection heuristic is achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foschini G J, Gans M J. On limits of wireless communications in a fading environment when using multiple antennas. Wirel Pers Commun, 1998, 6: 311–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Laneman J N, Tse D N C, Wornell G W. Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2004, 50: 3062–3080

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Nosratina A, Hunter T E, Hedayat A. Cooperative communication in wireless networks. IEEE Commun Mag, 2004, 42: 68–73

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter T E, Nosratina A. Diversity through coded cooperation. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2006, 5: 283–289

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li J, Ge J H, Wang Y, et al. A bandwidth efficient two-user cooperative diversity system with limited feedback. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2009, 52: 1055–1066

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiao L, Fuja T E, Kliewer J, et al. A network coding approach to cooperative diversity. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2007, 53: 3714–3722

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Larsson E G, Vojcic B R. Cooperative transmit diversity based on superposition modulation. IEEE Commun Lett, 2005, 9: 778–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahinthan V, Mark J W, Shen X S. A cooperative diversity scheme based on quadrature signaling. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2007 6: 41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo J, Blun R S, Cimini L J, et al. Decode-and-forward cooperative diversity with power allocation in wireless networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2007, 6: 793–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chris T K N, Andrea J G. The impact of CSI and power allocation on relay channel capacity and cooperation strategies. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2008, 7: 5380–5389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Y, Xu Y Y, Cai Y M. Power allocation for non-orthogonal decode-and-forward cooperation protocol. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2009, 52: 1037–1042

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee Y M, Tsai M H, Sou S I. Performance of decode-and-forward cooperation communications with multiple dual-hop relays over Nakagami-m fading channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2009, 8: 2853–2859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li L, Hu H L, Chen X, et al. Adaptive cooperative coding with power allocation in wireless relay networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2009, 8: 4604–4615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin Z, Erkip E, Stefanov A. Cooperative regions and partner choice in coded cooperative systems. IEEE Trans Commun, 2006, 54: 1323–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nosratinia A, Hunter T E. Grouping and partner selection in cooperative wireless networks. IEEE J Select Areas Commun, 2007, 25: 369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Simic L, Berber S M, Sowerby K W. Partner choice and power allocation for energy efficient cooperation in wireless sensor networks. In: Proc IEEE ICC, Beijing, China, 2008. 4255–4260

  17. Bletas A, Shin H, Win M Z. Cooperative communications with outage optimal opportunistic relaying. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2007, 6: 3450–3460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ibrahim A S, Sadek A K, Su W F, et al. Cooperative communications with relay-selection: when to cooperate and whom to cooperate with? IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2008, 7: 2814–2827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Proakis J G. Digital Communications. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen B L. Theory and algorithms of Optimization (in Chinese). 2nd ed. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou Q F, Lau F C M. Two incremental relaying protocols for cooperative networks. IET Commun, 2008, 2: 1272–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Loskot P, Beaulieu C N. Average error rate evaluation of digital modulations in slow fading by prony approximation. In: Proc IEEE ICC, Paris, France, 2004. 3353–3357

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Ge, J., Wang, Y. et al. Performance analysis and partner selection for cooperative diversity based on MQAM modulation. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 53, 1044–1055 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-010-0081-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-010-0081-1

Keywords

Navigation