Skip to main content
Log in

A new DSmT combination rule in open frame of discernment and its application

  • Research Paper
  • Special Focus
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new combination rule based on Dezert-Smarandache theory (DSmT) is proposed to deal with the conflict evidence resulting from the non-exhaustivity of the discernment frame. A two-dimensional measure factor in Dempster-Shafer theory (DST) is extended to DSmT to judge the conflict degree between evidence. The original DSmT combination rule or new DSmT combination rule can be selected for fusion according to this degree. Finally, some examples in simultaneous fault diagnosis of motor rotor are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed combination rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu W R, Hong J. Reinvestigating dempster’s idea on evidence combination. Knowl Inform Syst, 2000, 2: 223–241

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Gertler J, Anclerson K C. An evidential reasoning extension to quantitative model based failure diagnosis. IEEE Trans Syst, Man Cybern, 1992, 22: 275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan X F, Zou M J. Fault diagnosis of machines based on D-S evidence theory-part 1: DS evidence. Pattern Recogn Lett, 2006, 27: 366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan X F, Zou M J. Fault diagnosis of machines based on D-S evidence theory-part 2: Application of the improved D-S evidence theory in gearbox fault diagnosis. Pattern Recogn Lett, 2006, 27: 377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smarandache F, Dezert J. Applications and Advances of DSmT for Information Fusion. Arnoth: American Research Press, 2009. Vol 3

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Guralnik V, Mylaraswamy D, Voges H. On handling dependent evidence and multiple faults in knowledge fusion for engine health management. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2006

  8. Smets P, Kennes R. The transferable belief model. Artif Intell, 1994, AI-66: 191–234

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Smets P. The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 1990, 12: 447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeng C, Zhao B J, He P K. The combination of evidence in an incomplete frame of discernment (in Chinese). J Electron Inform Technol, 2005, 27: 1043–1046

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu W R. Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions. Artif Intell, 2006, 170: 909–924

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu X B, Wen C L, Wang Y C. Information fusion algorithm of fault diagnosis based on random set metrics of fuzzy fault features (in Chinese). J Electron Inform Technol, 2009, 31: 1635–1640

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to XiaoBin Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wen, C., Xu, X., Jiang, H. et al. A new DSmT combination rule in open frame of discernment and its application. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 55, 551–557 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4532-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4532-0

Keywords

Navigation