Abstract
In spaceborne synthetic aperture radar, undersampling at the rate of the pulse repetition frequency causes azimuth ambiguity, which induces ghost into the images. This paper introduces compressed sensing for azimuth ambiguity suppression and presents two novel methods from the perspectives of system design and image formation, known as azimuth random sampling and ambiguity separation, respectively. The first method makes the imaging results for the ambiguity zones as disperse as possible while ensuring that the imaging results for the main scene are affected as little as possible. The second method separates the ambiguity signals from the echoes and achieves imaging results without the ambiguity effect. Simulation results show that the two methods can reduce the ambiguity levels by about 16 dB and 99.37%, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gabban A, Greidanus H, Smith A J E, et al. Ship surveillance with terrasar-x scansar. In: Proceedings of the 3rd TerraSAR-X Science Team Meeting, Wessling, 2008
Mehlis J G. Synthetic aperture radar range-azimuth ambiguity design and constraints. In: International Radar Conference, Arlington, 1980. 143–152
Moreira A. Suppressing the azimuth ambiguities in synthetic aperture radar images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1993, 31: 885–895
Zhang Z M, Wang Z S. On suppressing azimuth ambiguities of Synthetic Aperture Radar by three filters. In: CIE International Conference on Radar, Beijing, 2001. 624–626
Guarnieri A M. Adaptive removal of azimuth ambiguities in SAR images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2005, 43: 625–633
Candès E J, Romberg J, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information, IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2006, 52: 489–509
Donoho D L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2006, 52: 1289–1306
Herman M, Strohomer T. Compressed sensing radar. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Las Vegas, 2008
Candès E J, Wakin M B. An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 2008, 3: 21–30
Davidson G W, Cumming I G, Ito M R. A chirp scaling for processing squint mode SAR data. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electr Syst, 1996, 32: 121–133
Ulander L M H, Hellsten H, Stenstrom G. Synthetic-aperture radar processing using fast factorized back-projection. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electro Syst, 2003, 39: 760–776
Fiedler H, Boerner E, Mittermayer J, et al. Total zero doppler steering-a new method for minimizing the Doppler centroid. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 2005, 2: 141–145
Elad M. Optimized projections for compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2007, 55: 5695–5702
Alonso M T, López-Dekker P, Mallorquí J J. A novel strategy for radar imaging based on compressive sensing. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2010, 48: 4285–4295
Cai T T, Wang L. Orthogonal matching pursuit for sparse signal recovery with noise. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2011, 57: 4680–4688
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, Z., Liu, M. Suppressing azimuth ambiguity in spaceborne SAR images based on compressed sensing. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 55, 1830–1837 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-012-4614-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-012-4614-7