Skip to main content
Log in

Effective capacity of delay quality-of-service constrained spectrum sharing cognitive radio with outdated channel feedback

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a spectrum sharing cognitive radio network coexisting with a primary network. Particularly, the channel state information (CSI) between the secondary transmitter and the primary receiver is assumed to be outdated due to channel feedback latency. The secondary user (SU) is assumed to satisfy a given delay quality-of-service (QoS) constraint as well as the average interference power constraint. We aim to derive the maximum arrival rate of the SU under aforementioned constraints with the outdated CSI. In this respect, we derive the optimal power allocation to achieve the maximum effective capacity, and further derive the effective capacity. The closed-form expressions for the lower and upper bounds on the effective capacity are also derived. In addition, we obtain the effective capacities under two widely adopted adaptive transmission schemes, i.e., optimal power and rate allocation (OPRA) and truncated channel inversion with fixed rate (TIFR). Numerical results are conducted to corroborate our studies. It is shown that the effective capacities of the SU under various transmission schemes are insensitive to the channel correlation coefficient especially under low channel correlation coefficient. It is also shown that the lower and upper bounds on the effective capacity are significantly tight under stringent delay QoS constraint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Federal Communications Commission. Spectrum policy task force report. ET Docket No. 02-155, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haykin S. Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2005, 23: 201–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haykin S, Thomson D, Reed J. Spectrum sensing for cognitive radio. Proc IEEE, 2009, 97: 849–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu D, Negi R. Effective capacity: a wireless link model for support of quality of service. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2003, 2: 630–643

    Google Scholar 

  5. Musavian L, Aissa S. Quality-of-service based power allocation in spectrum-sharing channels. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, New Orleans, 2008. 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  6. Musavian L, Aissa S. Effective capacity of delay-constrained cognitive radio in nakagami fading channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2010, 9: 1054–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu D, Feng Z Y, Zhang P. Protecting primary users in cognitive radio networks with effective capacity loss constraint. IEICE Trans Commun, 2012, 95: 349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Akin S, Gursoy M. Effective capacity analysis of cognitive radio channels for quality of service provisioning. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2010, 9: 3354–3364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akin S, Gursoy M. Cognitive radio transmission under interference limitations and QoS constraints. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Dresden, 2010. 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peha J. Approaches to spectrum sharing. IEEE Commun Mag, 2005, 43: 10–12

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kang X, Garg H, Liang Y C, et al. Optimal power allocation for OFDM-based cognitive radio with new primary transmission protection criteria. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2010, 9: 2066–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suraweera H A, Smith P J, Shafi M. Capacity limits and performance analysis of cognitive radio with imperfect channel knowledge. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2010, 59: 1811–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim H, Wang H, Lim S, et al. On the impact of outdated channel information on the capacity of secondary user in spectrum sharing environments. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2012, 11: 284–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke R. A statistical theory of mobile-radio reception. Bell Syst Tech J, 1968, 47: 957–1000

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu H L, Wang J Z. Chunk-based resource allocation in OFDMA systems—part I: chunk allocation. IEEE Trans Commun, 2009, 57: 2734–2744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu H L, Wang J Z. Chunk-based resource allocation in OFDMA systems—part II: joint chunk, power and bit allocation. IEEE Trans Commun, 2012, 60: 499–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang R. On peak versus average interference power constraints for protecting primary users in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2009, 8: 2112–2120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu D, Feng Z Y, Zhang P. Minimum average BER power allocation for fading channels in cognitive radio networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Cancun, 2011. 78–83

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gradshteyn I, Ryzhik I. Table of integrals, series, and products. 7th ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 2007

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldsmith A, Varaiya P. Capacity of fading channels with channel side information. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 1997, 43: 1986–1992

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ding Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, D., Feng, Z. & Zhang, P. Effective capacity of delay quality-of-service constrained spectrum sharing cognitive radio with outdated channel feedback. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 56, 1–13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-013-4805-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-013-4805-x

Keywords

Navigation