Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid event- and time-triggered control for double-integrator heterogeneous networks

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the state consensus for double-integrator networks under heterogeneous interaction topologies. For double-integrator networks, the setting of heterogeneous topologies means that position and velocity information flows are modeled by two different graphs. The corresponding protocol proposed in this paper is based on edge-event-triggered control. The events based on position information are irrelevant to velocity information and independent of the events based on velocity information. And for different edges, the corresponding events are activated independently of each other. Once an event occurs, the agents connected by the associated edge will sample their corresponding relative state information and update their corresponding controllers. Furthermore, under the presented event-triggering rules, the state consensus of double-integrator networks can be achieved by designing appropriate parameters. In addition, the proposed protocol with the event-triggering rules can effectively improve the system performance and avoid the occurrence of Zeno behaviors. Finally, a simulation example is worked out to verify the theoretical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheng D Z, He F H, Qi H S, et al. Modeling, analysis and control of networked evolutionary games. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2015, 60: 2402–2415

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng D Z, Qi H S. Controllability and observability of Boolean control networks. Automatica, 2009, 45: 1659–1667

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao Y, Cheng D Z. On controllability and stabilizability of probabilistic Boolean control networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2014, 57: 012202

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu W, Cheng D Z. Leader-following consensus of second-order agents with multiple time-varying delays. Automatica, 2010, 46: 1994–1999

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu Z H, Zhang L, Wang L. Controllability analysis of multi-agent systems with switching topology over finite fields. Sci China Inf Sci, 2019, 62: 012201

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin X, Zheng Y S, Wang L. Consensus of switched multi-agent systems with random networks. Int J Control, 2017, 90: 1113–1122

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Li A, Cornelius S P, Liu Y Y, et al. The fundamental advantages of temporal networks. Science, 2017, 358: 1042–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang L, Shi H, Chu T G, et al. Aggregation of foraging swarms. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australian Joint Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Cairns, 2004. 766–777

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang L, Xiao F. A new approach to consensus problems in discrete-time multiagent systems with time-delays. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2007, 50: 625–635

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao B, Guan Y Q, Wang L. Non-fragility of multi-agent controllability. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 052202

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Adler J L, Satapathy G, Manikonda V, et al. A multi-agent approach to cooperative traffic management and route guidance. Transport Res Part B-Meth, 2005, 39: 297–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guan Y Q, Wang L. Structural controllability of multi-agent systems with absolute protocol under fixed and switching topologies. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 092203

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang L, Jiang F C, Xie G M, et al. Controllability of multi-agent systems based on agreement protocols. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2009, 52: 2074–2088

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Dimarogonas D V, Tsiotras P, Kyriakopoulos K J. Leader-follower cooperative attitude control of multiple rigid bodies. Syst Control Lett, 2009, 58: 429–435

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang L, Xiao F. Finite-time consensus problems for networks of dynamic agents. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2010, 55: 950–955

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Olfati-Saber R. Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2006, 51: 401–420

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao F, Shi Y, Ren W. Robustness analysis of asynchronous sampled-data multiagent networks with time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2018, 63: 2145–2152

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiao F, Chen T W, Gao H J. Consensus in time-delayed multi-agent systems with quantized dwell times. Syst Control Lett, 2017, 104: 59–65

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao F, Chen T W. Adaptive consensus in leader-following networks of heterogeneous linear systems. IEEE Trans Control Network Syst, 2018, 5: 1169–1176

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Jing G S, Zheng Y S, Wang L. Consensus of multiagent systems with distance-dependent communication networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2017, 28: 2712–2726

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Olfati-Saber R, Murray R M. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2004, 49: 1520–1533

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ren W. On consensus algorithms for double-integrator dynamics. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2008, 53: 1503–1509

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Dibaji S M, Ishii H. Resilient consensus of double-integrator multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Portland, 2014. 5139–5144

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gao Y P, Wang L. Sampled-data based consensus of continuous-time multi-agent systems with time-varying topology. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2011, 56: 1226–1231

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Borgers D P, Heemels W P M H. Event-separation properties of event-triggered control systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2014, 59: 2644–2656

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Dimarogonas D V, Frazzoli E, Johansson K H. Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2012, 57: 1291–1297

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiao F, Meng X Y, Chen T W. Average sampled-data consensus driven by edge events. In: Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference, Hefei, 2012. 6239–6244

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xiao F, Chen T W, Gao H J. Synchronous hybrid event- and time-driven consensus in multiagent networks with time delays. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2016, 46: 1165–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xiao F, Meng X Y, Chen T W. Sampled-data consensus in switching networks of integrators based on edge events. Int J Control, 2015, 88: 391–402

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Xiao F, Chen T W. Sampled-data consensus in multi-agent systems with asynchronous hybrid event-time driven interactions. Syst Control Lett, 2016, 89: 24–34

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Seyboth G S, Dimarogonas D V, Johansson K H. Event-based broadcasting for multi-agent average consensus. Automatica, 2013, 49: 245–252

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Cao M T, Xiao F, Wang L. Event-based second-order consensus control for multi-agent systems via synchronous periodic event detection. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2015, 60: 2452–2457

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Åström K J, Bernhardsson B. Comparison of Riemann and Lebesgue sampling for first order stochastic systems. In: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, 2002. 2011–2016

    Google Scholar 

  34. Duan G P, Xiao F, Wang L. Asynchronous periodic edge-event triggered control for double-integrator networks with communication time delays. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2018, 48: 675–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Z Q, Hao F, Zhang L, et al. Consensus of linear multi-agent systems via event-triggered control. Int J Control, 2014, 87: 1243–1251

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Dimarogonas D V, Frazzoli E. Distributed event-triggered control strategies for multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Monticello, 2009. 906–910

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Kharisov E, Wang X F, Hovakimyan N. Distributed event-triggered consensus algorithm for uncertain multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  38. Godsil C, Royle G. Algebraic Graph Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zheng Y S, Ma J Y, Wang L. Consensus of hybrid multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2018, 29: 1359–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61751301, 61533001, 61873074).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, G., Xiao, F. & Wang, L. Hybrid event- and time-triggered control for double-integrator heterogeneous networks. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 62, 22203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9417-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9417-0

Keywords

Navigation