Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the dynamic memory effect of human drivers via ON-LSTM

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is a widely accepted view that considering the memory effects of historical information (driving operations) is beneficial for vehicle trajectory prediction models to improve prediction accuracy. However, many commonly used models (e.g., long short-term memory, LSTM) can only implicitly simulate memory effects, but lack effective mechanisms to capture memory effects from sequence data and estimate their effective time range (ETR). This shortage makes it hard to dynamically configure the most suitable length of used historical information according to the current driving behavior, which harms the good understanding of vehicle motion. To address this problem, we propose a modified trajectory prediction model based on ordered neuron LSTM (ON-LSTM). We demonstrate the feasibility of ETR estimation based on ON-LSTM and propose an ETR estimation method. We estimate the ETR of driving fluctuations and lane change operations on the NGSIM I-80 dataset. The experiment results prove that the proposed method can well capture the memory effects during trajectory prediction. Moreover, the estimated ETR values are in agreement with our intuitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang X, Jiang R, Li L, et al. Long memory is important: a test study on deep-learning based car-following model. Phys A-Stat Mech Its Appl, 2019, 514: 786–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pei X, Pan Y, Wang H, et al. Empirical evidence and stability analysis of the linear car-following model with gamma-distributed memory effect. Phys A-Stat Mech Its Appl, 2016, 449: 311–323

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Sipahi R, Niculescu S I. Stability of car following with human memory effects and automatic headway compensation. Proc R Soc A, 2010, 368: 4563–4583

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Treiber M, Helbing D. Memory effects in microscopic traffic models and wide scattering in flow-density data. Phys Rev E, 2003, 68: 046119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ammoun S, Nashashibi F. Real time trajectory prediction for collision risk estimation between vehicles. In: Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing, 2019. 417–422

  6. Hillenbrand J, Spieker A M, Kroschel K. A multilevel collision mitigation approach—its situation assessment, decision making, and performance tradeoffs. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst, 2006, 7: 528–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Batz T, Watson K, Beyerer J. Recognition of dangerous situations within a cooperative group of vehicles. In: Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2009. 907–912

  8. Lefévre S, Vasquez D, Laugier C. A survey on motion prediction and risk assessment for intelligent vehicles. Robomech J, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40648-014-0001-z

  9. Tay M K C, Laugier C. Modelling smooth paths using gaussian processes. In: Field and Service Robotics. Berlin: Springer, 2008. 381–390

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Tran Q, Firl J. Online maneuver recognition and multimodal trajectory prediction for intersection assistance using non-parametric regression. In: Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings, 2014. 918–923

  11. Aoude G, Joseph J, Roy N, et al. Mobile agent trajectory prediction using Bayesian nonparametric reachability trees. In: Proceedings of American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011. 1512–1529

  12. Lee J D, Moeckli J, Brown T L, et al. Distraction Detection and Mitigation Through Driver Feedback. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2013

  13. Zheng Y, Sathyanarayana A, Hansen J. Non-Uniform Time Window Processing of In-vehicle Signals for Maneuvers Recognition and Route Recovery. SAE Technical Paper, 2015

  14. Li G, Li S E, Liao Y, et al. Lane change maneuver recognition via vehicle state and driver operation signals-results from naturalistic driving data. In: Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2015. 865–870

  15. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput, 1997, 9: 1735–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sak H, Senior A, Beaufays F. Long short-term memory recurrent neural network architectures for large scale acoustic modeling. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, 2014

  17. Xing Y, Lv C, Cao D. Personalized vehicle trajectory prediction based on joint time-series modeling for connected vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2020, 69: 1341–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Altché F, de La Fortelle A. An LSTM network for highway trajectory prediction. In: Proceedings of IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2017. 353–359

  19. Kim B, Kang C M, Kim J, et al. Probabilistic vehicle trajectory prediction over occupancy grid map via recurrent neural network. In: Proceedings of IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2017, 399–404

  20. Alahi A, Goel K, Ramanathan V, et al. Social LSTM: human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016. 961–971

  21. Deo N, Trivedi M M. Multi-modal trajectory prediction of surrounding vehicles with maneuver based LSTMs. In: Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2018. 1179–1184

  22. Xing Y, Lv C. Dynamic state estimation for the advanced brake system of electric vehicles by using deep recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2952807

  23. Wang X, Jiang R, Li L, et al. Capturing car-following behaviors by deep learning. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2018, 19: 910–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen Y, Tan S, Sordoni A, et al. Ordered neurons: integrating tree structures into recurrent neural networks. 2018. ArXiv: 181009536

  25. Dai S, Li L, Li Z. Modeling vehicle interactions via modified LSTM models for trajectory prediction. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 38287–38296

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018AAA0101400), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61790565), Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen (Grant No. JCYJ20170818092931604), and Intel Collaborative Research Institute for Intelligent and Automated Connected Vehicles (Grant No. ICRI-IACV).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, S., Li, Z., Li, L. et al. Investigating the dynamic memory effect of human drivers via ON-LSTM. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 63, 190202 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2844-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2844-3

Keywords

Navigation