Skip to main content
Log in

Collaborative representation with background purification and saliency weight for hyperspectral anomaly detection

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collaborative representation-based detection (CRD) has been developed in hyperspectral anomaly detection tasks and testified to be very effective; however, heterogeneous pixels in the background may affect the accuracy of linear representation and make its performance suboptimal. To address this issue, a background purification framework based on linear representation is proposed, in which an automatic outlier removal strategy based on initial coefficients is designed to purify the background. In the proposed method, the classic least squares technique is firstly adopted to obtain preliminary linear representation coefficients, which are positively correlated with its contribution to a central testing pixel. Then, using statistical analysis of the representation coefficients, purified background pixels are obtained. Furthermore, a saliency weight is applied to fully utilize the spatial information of inner window pixels. Extensive experiments with three real hyperspectral datasets show that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art CRD and other traditional detectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li Y F, Li J, He L, et al. A new sensor bias-driven spatio-temporal fusion model based on convolutional neural networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2020, 63: 140302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. He N J, Fang L Y, Plaza A. Hybrid first and second order attention Unet for building segmentation in remote sensing images. Sci China Inf Sci, 2020, 63: 140305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu X B, Qiao Y L, Xiong Y H, et al. Cascade conditional generative adversarial nets for spatial-spectral hyperspectral sample generation. Sci China Inf Sci, 2020, 63: 140306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang X D, Zhang X P, Li S T, et al. Hyperspectral anomaly detection with attribute and edge-preserving filters. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2017, 55: 5600–5611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reed I S, Yu X L. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process, 1990, 38: 1760–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matteoli S, Diani M, Corsini G. Improved estimation of local background covariance matrix for anomaly detection in hyperspectral images. Opt Eng, 2010, 49, 046201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo Q D, Zhang B, Ran Q, et al. Weighted-RXD and linear filter-based RXD: improving background statistics estimation for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sens, 2014, 7: 2351–2366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwon H, Nasrabadi N M. Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2005, 43: 388–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Y, Nasrabadi N M, Tran T D. Simultaneous joint sparsity model for target detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 2011, 8: 676–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu Y, Wu Z B, Li J, et al. Anomaly detection in hyperspectral images based on low-rank and sparse representation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2016, 54: 1990–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan K, Hou Z F, Ma D L, et al. Anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery based on low-rank representation incorporating a spatial constraint. Remote Sens, 2019, 11: 1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li W, Du Q. Collaborative representation for hyperspectral anomaly detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2015, 53: 1463–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li W, Wu G D, Du Q. Transferred deep learning for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 2017, 14: 597–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tao R, Zhao X D, Li W, et al. Hyperspectral anomaly detection by fractional fourier entropy. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sens, 2019, 12: 4920–4929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vafadar M, Ghassemian H. Hyperspectral anomaly detection using outlier removal from collaborative representation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IPRIA), Shahrekord, 2017. 13–19

  16. Su H J, Wu Z Y, Du Q, et al. Hyperspectral anomaly detection using collaborative representation with outlier removal. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sens, 2018, 11: 5029–5038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y, Fan Y G, Xu M M. A background-purification-based framework for anomaly target detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 2020, 17: 1238–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao C H, Wang X P, Yao X F, et al. A background refinement method based on local density for hyperspectral anomaly detection. J Cent South Univ, 2018, 25: 84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan K, Hou Z F, Wu F Y, et al. Anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery based on the regularized subspace method and collaborative representation. Remote Sens, 2019, 11: 1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goferman S, Zelnik-Manor L, Tal A. Context-aware saliency detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 2012, 34: 1915–1926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan K, Li E Z, Du Q, et al. Hyperspectral image classification using band selection and morphological profiles. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sens, 2014, 7: 40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu W H, Feng X P, Wang S, et al. Random selection-based adaptive saliency-weighted RXD anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens, 2018, 39: 2139–2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Herweg J A, Kerekes J P, Weatherbee O, et al. Spectir hyperspectral airborne rochester experiment data collection campaign. In: Proceedings of SPIE, 2012. 839028

  24. Zhao R, Du B, Zhang L P. Hyperspectral anomaly detection via a sparsity score estimation framework. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2017, 55: 3208–3222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanley J A, McNeil B J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 1982, 143: 29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Project of China (Grant No. 017YFB-0503903), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61922013, 61421001, U1833203), Key Scientific and Technological Projects in Henan Province (Grant No. 192102210106), and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. L191004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, Z., Li, W., Tao, R. et al. Collaborative representation with background purification and saliency weight for hyperspectral anomaly detection. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 65, 112305 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-2915-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-2915-2

Keywords

Navigation