Skip to main content
Log in

Prostate cancer detection with an improved resonance sensor system: parameter evaluation in a silicone model and on human prostate tissue in vitro

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to improve a resonance sensor system for prostate cancer detection and evaluate its performance on silicone with different hardness. Furthermore, to investigate if the instrument could distinguish between cancerous and normal prostate tissue in one in vitro prostate specimen. The system could measure the frequency shift, impression depth and the rise time of the force signal. The frequency shift, impression depth and the rise time described the relative hardness of silicone (n = 50, P < 0.05). The results from measurements on the prostate specimen indicated that there is a significant difference in the parameter data between cancerous and normal prostate tissue (n = 15, P < 0.05). The parameters’ impression depth and force rise time adds important information for cancer detection. Further studies on prostate tissue with different tumour types must be performed in order to understand the full value of the new sensor system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Δf:

Frequency shift (kHz)

T R :

Rise time (s)

l p :

Impression depth (mm)

Q cancer :

Percentage of cancerous tissue

k x :

Stiffness

DAQ:

Data acquisition card

DRE:

Digital rectal palpation

PSA:

Prostate specific antigen

TRUS:

Transrectal ultrasound

TST:

Tactile sensor technology

fPLL:

Frequency-phase-locked loop

pPLL:

Position-phase-locked loop

References

  1. Aarnink RG, Beerlage HP, Rosette JJMCHDL, Debruyne FMJ, Wijkstra H (1998) Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate: innovations and future applications. J Urol 159:1568–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eklund A, Bergh A, Lindahl OA (1999) A catheter tactile sensor for measuring the hardness of soft tissue: measurements in a silicone model and in an in vitro human prostate model. Med Biol Eng Comput 33:618–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eklund A, Hallberg P, Lindén C, Lindahl OA (2003) An applanation resonator sensor for measuring intraocular pressure using combined continuous force and area measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3017–3024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawakami J, Siemens DR, Nickel JC (2004) Prostatis and prostate cancer: implications for prostate cancer screening. J Urol 64:1075–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindahl OA, Omata S (1995) Impression technique for the assessment of oedema: comparison with a new tactile sensor that measures physical properties of tissue. Med Biol Eng Comput 33:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mast TD (2000) Empirical relationships between acoustic parameters in human soft tissue. Acoust Res Online 1(2):37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ogata K (1997) Modern control engineering, 3rd edn. Tom Robbins, USA

  8. Omata S, Terunuma (1992) New tactile sensor like the human hand and its applications. Sens Actuators A35:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Omata S, Constantinou CE (1995) Modeling of micturition characteristics based on prostatic stiffness modulation induced using hormones and adrenergic antagonists. IEEE Tran Biomed Eng 42:843–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Omata S, Murayama Y, Constantinou CE (2004) Real time robotic tactile sensor system for the determination of the physical properties of biomaterials. Sens Actuators A Phys 112:278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS (2000) Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer 37:4–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schröder F, van der Maas HP, Beemsterboer P, Kruger B, Hoedemaeker AR, Rietbergen J, Kranse R (1998) Evaluation of the digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer. J Nation Cancer Inst 90:1817–1823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tortora GJ, Grabowski SR (2003) Principles of anatomy and physiology, 10th edn. Harper Collins Publishers Inc

Download references

Acknowledgment

The study was supported by EU Objective One, northern Sweden, and the Swedish Cancer Society (project 4716).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Lindberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindberg, P., Andersson, B., Bergh, A. et al. Prostate cancer detection with an improved resonance sensor system: parameter evaluation in a silicone model and on human prostate tissue in vitro. Med Bio Eng Comput 44, 1053–1059 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0129-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0129-y

Keywords

Navigation