Abstract
The net joint forces and moments may be computed by several 3D inverse dynamic methods. To do so, an orthonormal segment coordinate system (SCS) is generally mandatory. However, the segment axes ought to be selected following anatomical, functional, and inertial requirements that are hardly compatible with orthogonal axes. An alternative method based on generalized coordinates allows computing inverse dynamics using directly a set of basic points and unitary vectors. A segment definition is put forward in order to follow all of the anatomical, functional, and inertial requirements and the inverse dynamics is performed in a non orthonormal segment coordinate system (NSCS). The NSCS seems a convenient definition in biomechanics as far as anatomical, functional and inertial axes are concerned, but providing that the 3D joint forces and moments are still computable. The inverse dynamic method in NSCS is applied to the gait of a knee valgus subject and compared to a classical inverse dynamic method. The inverse dynamic method in NSCS shows comparable results but implies further clinical interpretations.
References
Allard P, Stokes IAF, Blanchi J (1995) Three-dimensional analysis of human movement. Human Kinetics, Champaign
Allard P, Lachance R, Aissaoui R, Duhaime M (1996) Simultaneous bilateral 3-D able-bodied gait. Hum Mov Sci 15:327–346
Apkarian J, Naumann S, Cairns B (1989) A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic model of the lower limb. J Biomech 22:143–155
Besier TF, Sturnieks DL, Alderson JA, Lloyd DG (2003) Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis. J Biomech 36:1159–1168
van den Bogert AJ, Smith GD, Nigg BM (1994) In vivo determination of the anatomical axes of the ankle joint complex: an optimization approach. J Biomech 27:1477–1488
Cappozzo A, Catani F, Croce UD, Leardini A (1995) Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech 10:171–178
Chaffin DB, Anderson GBJ (1991) Occupational biomechanics. Wiley, New York
Chandler RF, Clauser CE, McConville JT, Reynolds HM, Young JW (1975) Investigation of inertial properties of the human body. Technical report AMRL-74–137. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton
Chèze L, Fregly BJ, Dimnet J (1995) A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data. J Biomech 28:879–884
Chèze L, Gutierrez C, San-Marcelino R, Dimnet J (1996) Biomechanics of the upper limb using robotic techniques. Hum Mov Sci 15:477–496
Chèze L, Fregly BJ, Dimnet J (1998) Determination of joint functional axes from noisy marker data using the finite helical axis. Hum Mov Sci 17:1–15
Clauser CE, McConville JT, Young JW (1969) Weight, volume, and center of mass of segments of the human body. Technical report AMRL-TR-69–70. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton
Davis RBI, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR (1991) A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 10:575–587
Dempster WT (1955) Space requirements for the seated operator. WADC technical report TR-55–159. Wright Air Development Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton
Doriot N, Chèze L (2004) A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic study of the lower limb during the stance phase of gait using an homogeneous matrix approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:21–27
Dumas R, Chèze L, Verriest JP (2006) Adjustments to McConville et al. and Young et al. body segment inertial parameters. J Biomech (in press)
Dumas R, Nicol E, Chèze L (2006) Influence of perturbated gait data on four 3D inverse dynamic methods. In: Ninth symposium on 3D analysis of human movement, Valenciennes, France, 28–30 July: http://www.univvalenciennes.fr/congres/3D2006/Abstracts/152- Dumas.pdf
Dumas R, Aissaoui R, de Guise JA (2004) A 3D generic inverse dynamic method using wrench notation and quaternion algebra. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 7:159–166
Eng JJ, Winter DA (1995) Kinetic analysis of the lower limbs during walking: what information can be gained from a three-dimensional model? J Biomech 28:753–758
Gamage SS, Lasenby J (2002) New least squares solutions for estimating the average centre of rotation and the axis of rotation. J Biomech 35:87–93
Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136–144
Halvorsen K (2003) Bias compensated least squares estimate of the center of rotation. J Biomech 36:999–1008
Hartenberg RS, Denavit I (1964) Kinematic synthesis of linkages. McGraw-Hill, New York
Holden JP, Stanhope SJ (1998) The effect of variation in knee center location estimates on net knee joint moments. Gait Posture 7:1–6
Jalon JG, Bayo E (1994) Kinematic and dynamic simulation of mechanical systems—the real-time challenge. Springer, Heidelberg
Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME, Gainey J, Gorton G, Cochran GV (1989) Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J Orthop Res 7:849–860
Kirtley C (2001) Summary: quaternions vs. Euler angles. Biomch-L: http://www.isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l/archives/biomch-l-2001-05/00018.html
de Leva P (1996) Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov’s segment inertia parameters. J Biomech 29:1223–1230
Moisio KC, Sumner DR, Shott S, Hurwitz DE (2003) Normalization of joint moments during gait: a comparison of two techniques. J Biomech 36:599–603
Most E, Axe J, Rubash H, Li G (2004) Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. J Biomech 37:1743–1748
Pearsall DJ, Costigan PA (1999) The effect of segment parameter error on gait analysis results. Gait Posture 9:173–183
Pearsall DJ, Reid JG (1994) The study of human body segment parameters in biomechanics. An historical review and current status report. Sports Med 18:126–140
Ramakrishnan HK, Kadaba MP, Wootten ME (1987) Lower extremity joint moments and ground reaction torque in adult gait. Biomechanics of normal and prosthetic gait BED. Am Soc Mach Eng 4:87–92
Rao G, Amarantini D, Berton E, Favier D (2005) Influence of body segments’ parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait. J Biomech (in press)
Reid JG, Jensen RK (1990) Human body segment inertia parameters: a survey and status report. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 18:225–241
Reinbolt JA, Schutte JF, Fregly BJ, Koh BI, Haftka RT, George AD, Mitchell KH (2005) Determination of patient-specific multi-joint kinematic models through two-level optimization. J Biomech 38:621–626
Schache AG, Baker R (2006) On the expression of joint moments during gait. Gait Posture (in press)
Schwartz MH, Rozumalski A (2005) A new method for estimating joint parameters from motion data. J Biomech 38:107–116
Silva MP, Ambrosio JA (2002) Kinematic data consistency in the inverse dynamic analysis of biomechanical systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 8:219–239
Silva MP, Ambrosio JA (2004) Sensitivity of the results produced by the inverse dynamic analysis of a human stride to perturbed input data. Gait Posture 19:35–49
Spring KW (1986) Euler parameters and the use of quaternion algebra in the manipulation of finite rotations: a review. Mech Mach Theory 21:365–373
Stagni R, Leardini A, Cappozzo A, Grazia Benedetti M, Cappello A (2000) Effects of hip joint centre mislocation on gait analysis results. J Biomech 33:1479–1487
Vaughan CL, Davis BL, O’Connor JC (1992) Dynamics of human gait. Human Kinetics, Champaign
Woltring HJ, Huiskes R, de Lange A, Veldpaus FE (1985) Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics. J Biomech 18:379–389
Wu G, Cavanagh PR (1995) ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. J Biomech 28:1257–1261
Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D’Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H, Schmid O, Stokes I (2002) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech 35:543–548
Zatsiorsky VM, Seluyanov VN, Chugunova LG (1990) Methods of determining mass-inertial characteristics of human body segments. Contemporary Problems of Biomechanics: 272–291
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Lionel Frossard, from University Claude Bernard Lyon1, for sharing his experience in rigid body dynamics using generalized coordinates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The interpolation matrix allows computing the position of a point in the ICS, knowing its coordinates in the NSCS \({{\left({P_{i}, {\mathbf{u}}_{i}, {\left({{\mathbf{r}}_{{P_{i}}} - {\mathbf{r}}_{{D_{i}}}} \right)},{\mathbf{w}}_{i}} \right)}}\) and the generalized coordinates of the segment. For example, the position vector of the centre of mass \({\bf r}_{C_{i}}\) in the ICS can be expressed:
This expression (Eq. 15) is written in matrix form:
Four points, P i , D i , U i and W i , have remarkable coordinates in the NSCS (for i = 1, 2 and 3):
The corresponding remarkable interpolation matrices are:
These interpolation matrices can be used to compute the generalized forces applied at these points. Concerning moments, the generalized moments cannot be computed with interpolation matrices [25]. Moments have first to be replaced by couple of opposite forces.
The moment M at proximal point P i can be replaced by three forces about the three axes \({{\left({{\mathbf{u}}_{i}, {\mathbf{r}}_{{P_{i}}} - {\mathbf{r}}_{{D_{i}}}, {\mathbf{w}}_{i}} \right)}}\) and applied at the three points U i , W i and D i :
This expression (Eq. 17) is written in matrix form:
Three opposite forces are applied at endpoint P i in order to maintain equilibrium. Thus, six concentrated forces are required to represent the moment and the generalized moment is:
Therefore, the pseudo-interpolation matrix is (Eq. 12):
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dumas, R., Chèze, L. 3D inverse dynamics in non-orthonormal segment coordinate system. Med Bio Eng Comput 45, 315–322 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0156-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0156-8