Skip to main content
Log in

Electro-mechanical stability of surface EMG sensors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compared the performance of surface electromyographic (sEMG) sensors for different detection conditions affecting the electro-mechanical stability between the sensor and its contact with the skin. These comparisons were made to gain a better understanding of how specific characteristics of sensor design and use may alter the ability of sEMG sensors to detect signals with high fidelity under conditions of vigorous activity. The first part of the study investigated the effect of different detection surface contours and adhesive tapes on the ability of the sensor to remain in electrical contact with the skin. The second part of the study investigated the effects of different skin preparations and hydrophilic gels on the production of movement artifact resulting from sinusoidal and impact mechanical perturbations. Both parts of the study evaluated sensor performance under dry skin and wet skin (from perspiration) conditions. We found that contouring the detection surface and adding a more adhesive double-sided tape were effective in increasing the forces needed to disrupt the electrical contact between the electrodes and the skin for both dry skin and wet skin conditions. The mechanical perturbation tests demonstrated that hydrophilic gel applied to the detection surface of the sensor produced greater movement artifacts compared to sensors without gel, particularly when the sensors were tested under conditions in which perspiration was present on the skin. The use of a surfactant skin preparation did not influence the amount of movement artifacts that resulted from either the sinusoidal or impact perturbations. The importance of these findings is discussed in terms of their implications for improving sEMG signal fidelity through sensor design modifications and procedures for interfacing them with the skin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aronson S, Geddes LA (1985) Electrode potential stability. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 32:987–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basmajian J, De Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive: their function revealed by electromyography, 5th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blok J, van Asselt S, van Dijk J, Stegeman D (1997) On an optimal pasteless electrode to skin interface in surface EMG. In: Hermens HJ, Freriks B (eds) SENIAM 5: the state of the art on sensors and sensor placement procedures for surface electromyography: a proposal for sensor placement procedures. Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, pp 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Luca CJ (1997) The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech 13:135–163

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Luca C, Le Fever R, Stulen F (1979) Pasteless electrode for clinical use. Med Biol Eng Comput 17:387–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Talhouet H, Webster JG (1996) The origin of skin-stretch-caused motion artifacts under electrodes. Physiol Meas 17:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DeVries KL, Borgmeier PR (2003) Testing of Adhesives. In: Pizzi A, Mittal KL (eds) Handbook of Adhesive Technology, Marcell Dekker, New York, pp. 223–253.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez M, Pallas-Areny R (2000) Ag–AgCl electrode noise in high-resolution ECG measurements. Biomed Instrum Technol 34:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gatzke RD (1974) The electrode: a measurement system viewpoint. In: Miller HA, Harrison DC (eds) Biomedical electrode technology. Academic, New York, pp 99–116

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geddes LA, Baker LE (1989) Principles of applied biomedical instrumentation, Chap. 9: electrodes. Wiley, New York, pp 315–452

  11. Gondran C, Siebert E, Yacoub S, Novakov E (1996) Noise of surface bio-potential electrodes based on NASICON ceramic and Ag–AgCl. Med Biol Eng Comput 34:460–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagemann B, Luhede G, Luczak H (1985) Improved “active” electrodes for recording bioelectric signals in work physiology. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 54:95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huigen E, Peper A, Grimbergen CA (2002) Investigation into the origin of the noise of surface electrodes. Med Biol Eng Comput 40:332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Inman VT (1953) The pattern of muscular activity in the lower extremity during walking. Calif Univ Techn Rep Ser III 25, pp 1–41

  15. Kumar S (1996) Electromyography in ergonomics, In: Kumar S, Mital A (eds) Electromyography in ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, Bristol, pp 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merletti R, Hermens H (2004) Detection and conditioning of the surface EMG signal. In: Merletti R, Parker P (eds) Electromyography: physiology, engineering, and noninvasive applications. Wiley, New York, pp 107–132

    Google Scholar 

  17. Odman S, Oberg PA (1982) Movement-induced potentials in surface electrodes. Med Biol Eng Comput 20:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Piper H (1907) Uber den willkurlichen muskeltetanus. Pflugers Arch Ges Physiol Mensch Tiere 119:301-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roman J, Lamb L (1962) Electrocardiography in flight. Aerosp Med 33:527–544

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tassinary LG, Green TR, Cacioppo JT, Edelberg R (1990) Issues in biometrics: offset potentials and the electrical stability of Ag/AgCl electrodes. Psychophysiology 27:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tam HW, Webster JG (1977) Minimizing electrode motion artifact by skin abrasion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 24(2):134-139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Turker KS (1993) Electromyography: some methodological problems and issues. Phys Ther 73:698–710

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zipp P, Hennemann K, Grunwald R, Rohmert W (1980) Bioelectrode jellies for long-term monitoring. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 45:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project was funded in part by SBIR awards from NASA (Contract # NAS 9-98035). We appreciate the assistance of Mr. Per Bergman in writing the data analysis software for the study and providing helpful suggestions during the planning stages of the research design and the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. H. Roy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roy, S.H., De Luca, G., Cheng, M.S. et al. Electro-mechanical stability of surface EMG sensors. Med Bio Eng Comput 45, 447–457 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0168-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0168-z

Keywords

Navigation