Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A versatile 3D reconstruction system of the spine and pelvis for clinical assessment of spinal deformities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction system of the human spine for the routine evaluation of musculoskeletal pathologies like idiopathic scoliosis. The main objective of this 3D reconstruction system is to offer a versatile and robust tool for the 3D analysis of spines in any healthcare centre with standard clinical setup using standard uncalibrated radiographic images. The novel system uses a self-calibration algorithm and a weak-perspective method to reconstruct the 3D coordinates of anatomical landmarks from bi-planar radiographic images of a patient’s trunk. Additionally, a small planar object of known dimensions is proposed to warrant an accurately scaled model of the spine. In order to assess the validity of the 3D reconstructions yielded by the proposed system, a clinical study using 60 pairs of digitized X-rays of adolescents was conducted. The subject cohort in the study group was composed of 51 scoliotic and 9 non-scoliotic patients, with an average Cobb angle on the frontal plane of 25°. For each case, a 3D reconstruction of the spine and pelvis was obtained with the previous system used at our hospital (which requires a positioning apparatus and a calibration jacket), and with the proposed method. Results show that 3D reconstructions obtained with the new system using uncalibrated X-ray images yield geometrically accurate models with insignificant differences for 2D and 3D clinical indexes commonly used in the evaluation of spinal deformities. This demonstrates the system to be a viable and accurate tool for clinical studies and biomechanical analysis purposes, with the added advantage of versatility to any clinical setup for routine follow-ups and surgical planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. André B, Dansereau J, Labelle H (1992) Effect of radiographic landmark identification errors on the accuracy of three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine. Med Biol Eng Comput 30:569–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aubin CE, Dansereau J et al (1998) Three-dimensional measurement of wedged scoliotic vertebrae and intervertebral disks. Eur Spine J 7:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aubin CE, Descrimes JL et al (1995) Geometrical modeling of the spine and the thorax for the biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using the finite element method. Ann Chir 49:749–761

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown RH, Burstein AH, Nash CL, Schock CC (1976) Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. J Biomech 9:355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheriet F, Dansereau J, Petit Y, Aubin CE, De Guise JA, Labelle H (1999) Towards the self-calibration of a multiview radiographic imaging system for the 3D reconstruction of the human spine and rib cage. Intern J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 13:761–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheriet F, Laporte C, Kadoury S, Labelle H, Dansereau J (2007) Novel system for the 3D reconstruction of the human spine and rib cage from biplanar X-Ray images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng (in press)

  7. Cheriet F, Meunier J (1999) Self-calibration of a biplane X-ray imaging system for an optimal 3D reconstruction. Comput Med Imaging Graph 23:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Amer Acad Orthop Surg Instruct Lect 5:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dansereau J, Beauchamp A, De Guise J, Labelle H (1990) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the spine and the rib cage from stereoradiographic and imaging techniques. 16th Conf Can Soc Mech Eng 2:61–64

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dansereau J, Stokes IA (1988) Measurements of the three-dimensional shape of the rib cage. J Biomech 21:893–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Giorgi G, Gentile A, Mantriota G (1992) Three-dimensional study of the spine: our 10-year experience, International symposium on 3D scoliotic deformities, pp 71–80

  12. Delorme S, Labelle H, Aubin CE, De Guise JA, Dansereau J (1999) Comparison between clinical Cobb angles and measurements performed on vertebral bodies, pedicle centroids and spinous processes. Ann Chir 53:792–797

    Google Scholar 

  13. Delorme S, Petit Y, De Guise JA, Labelle H, Aubin CE, Dansereau J (2003) Assessment of the 3D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2D radiographic images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50:989–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delorme S, Violas P, Dansereau J, De Guise JA, Aubin CE, Labelle H (2000) Preoperative and early postoperative changes of the rib cage after posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 10:101–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gauvin C, Dansereau J, Petit Y, De Guise JA, Labelle H (1998) Customized 3D radiographic reconstruction of the human pelvis. Ann Chir 52:744–751

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hierholzer E, Luxmann G (1982) Three-dimensional shape analysis of the scoliotic spine using invariant shape parameters. J Biomech 15:583–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hindmarsh J, Larsson J, Mattsson O (1980) Analysis of changes in the scoliotic spine using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. J Biomech 13:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, Jequier JC (1995) Variability of geometric measurements from three-dimensional reconstructions of scoliotic spines and rib cages. Eur Spine J 4:88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, Poitras B (1996) Three-dimensional effect of the Boston brace on the thoracic spine and rib cage. Spine 21:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, Poitras B, Rivard CH, Stokes IA, De Guise J (1995) Comparison between preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional reconstructions of idiopathic scoliosis with the Cotrel-Dubousset procedure. Spine 20:2487–2492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of non-linear parameters. J Soc Indust Appl Math 11:431–441

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Novosad J, Cheriet F, Labelle H (2002) 3D reconstruction of the spine from uncalibrated biplanr intraoperative X-ray images. Can Med Biol Eng Soc

  24. Papin P, Labelle H, Delorme S, Aubin CE, De Guise JA, Dansereau J (1999) Long-term three-dimensional changes of the spine after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 8:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pearcy MJ, Whittle MW (1982) Movements of the lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis. J Biomed Eng 4:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Remaki L, Cheriet F, Bellefleur C, Labelle H, Dansereau J (2000) A robustness study of self-calibration technique for the radiographic 3D reconstruction of human spine. Arch Physiol Biochem 108

  27. Stokes IA, Bigalow LC, Moreland MS (1986) Measurement of axial rotation of vertebrae in scoliosis. Spine 11:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stokes IA, Bigalow LC, Moreland MS (1987) Three-dimensional spinal curvature in idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Res 5:102–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Trucco E, Verri A (1998) Introductory techniques for 3D computer vision. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  30. Villemure I, Aubin CE, Grimard G, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2001) Progression of vertebral and spinal three-dimensional deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal study. Spine 26:2244–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Walker A, Dickson RA (1984) School screening and pelvic tilt scoliosis. Lancet 2:152–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Kadoury.

Additional information

This paper was supported in part by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Fonds Quebecois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies (FQRNT).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kadoury, S., Cheriet, F., Laporte, C. et al. A versatile 3D reconstruction system of the spine and pelvis for clinical assessment of spinal deformities. Med Bio Eng Comput 45, 591–602 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0182-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0182-1

Keywords

Navigation