Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging of small spherical structures in CT: simulation study using measured point spread function

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Size and density measurements of objects undertaken using computed tomography (CT) are clinically significant for diagnosis. To evaluate the accuracy of these quantifications, we simulated three-dimensional (3D) CT image blurring; this involved the calculation of the convolution of the 3D object function with the measured 3D point spread function (PSF). We initially validated the simulation technique by performing a phantom experiment. Blurred computed images showed good 3D agreement with measured images of the phantom. We used this technique to compute the 3D blurred images from the object functions, in which functions are determined to have the shape of an ideal sphere of varying diameter and assume solitary pulmonary nodules with a uniform density. The accuracy of diameter and density measurements was determined. We conclude that the proposed simulation technique enables us to estimate the image blurring precisely of any 3D structure and to analyze clinical images quantitatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blake ME, Soto JA, Hayes RA, Ferrucci JT (2005) Automated volumetry at CT colonography: a phantom study. Acad Radiol 12:608–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boone JM (2001) Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography. Med Phys 28:356–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dougherty G, Newman D (1999) Measurement of thickness and density of thin structures by computed tomography: a simulation study. Med Phys 26:1341–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V, Freund T, Akkol E, Felix R (2003) Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 13:2378–2383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishikawa H, Koizumi N, Morita T, Tani Y, Tsuchida M, Umezu H, Naito M, Sasai K (2005) Ultrasmall pulmonary opacities on multidetector-row high-resolution computed tomography: a prospective radiologic−pathologic examination. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:621–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeong YJ, Lee KS, Jeong SY, Chung MJ, Shim SS, Kim H, Kwon OJ, Kim S (2005) Solitary pulmonary nodule: characterization with combined wash-in and washout features at dynamic multi-detector row CT. Radiology 237:675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalender WA (2005) Computed tomography. 2nd revised edn. Erlangen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marchand EW (1964) Derivation of the point spread function from the line spread function. J Opt Soc Am 54:915–919

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Meinel JF Jr, Wang G, Jiang M, Frei T, Vannier M, Hoffman E (2003) Spatial variation of resolution and noise in multi-detector row spiral CT. Acad Radiol 10:607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Okubo M, Wada S, Saito M (2005) Validation of the blurring of a small object on CT images calculated on the basis of three-dimensional spatial resolution. Igaku Butsuri 25:132–140

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ohkubo M, Wada S, Matsumoto T, Nishizawa K (2006) An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography. Med Phys 33:2757–2764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Prevrhal S, Engelke K, Kalender WA (1999) Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. Phys Med Biol 44:751–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prevrhal S, Fox JC, Shepherd JA, Genant H K (2003) Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions. Med Phys 30:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. La Rivière PJ, Pan X (2002) Pitch dependence of longitudinal sampling and aliasing effects in multi-slice helical computed tomography (CT). Phys Med Biol 47:2797–2810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. La Rivière PJ, Pan X (2002) Anti-aliasing weighting functions for single-slice helical CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:978–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rollano-Hijarrubia E, Stokking R, van der Meer F, Niessen WJ (2006) Imaging of small high-density structures in CT: a phantom study. Acad Radiol 13:893–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarzband G, Kiryati N (2005) The point spread function of spiral CT. Phys Med Biol 50:5307–5322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Swensen SJ, Viggiano RW, Midthun DE et al (2000) Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology 214:73–80

    Google Scholar 

  19. Teo BK, Seo Y, Bacharach SL, Carrasquillo JA, Libutti SK, Shukla H, Hasegawa BH, Hawkins RA, Franc BL (2007) Partial-volume correction in PET: validation of an iterative postreconstruction method with phantom and patient data. J Nucl Med 48:802–810

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wada S, Takahashi K, Katada T, Tsuchimochi M (1998) An analytical method for precise measurements of cortical bone thickness using CT image - dual mode LSF analysis and its precision. CAR’98 Comp Assist Radiol Surg, Tokyo, pp. 63–67

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang G, Vannier MW (1994) Spatial variation of section sensitivity profile in spiral computed tomography. Med Phys 21:1491–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiemker R, Rogalla P, Blaffert T, Sifri D, Hay O, Shah E, Truyen R, Fleiter T (2005) Aspects of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry of pulmonary nodules using multislice CT. Br J Radiol 78:S46–S56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, Marheine A, Beyer F, Heindel W, Diederich S (2004) Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: In vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14:86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI (2000) Small pulmonary nodules: Volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217:251–256

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research (Grant No. 15–25) from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, and in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (Grant No. 15070205) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan. This research was also supported by a joint study undertaken between Niigata University and Fujitsu Limited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaki Ohkubo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohkubo, M., Wada, S., Kunii, M. et al. Imaging of small spherical structures in CT: simulation study using measured point spread function. Med Biol Eng Comput 46, 273–282 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0283-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0283-x

Keywords

Navigation