Skip to main content
Log in

Biomechanical effect of electromechanical knee–ankle–foot-orthosis on knee joint control in patients with poliomyelitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, an ideal electromechanical KAFO, satisfying stability in the stance and knee flexion in the swing phase during walking, was developed. Biomechanical evaluations were performed on four polio patients by means of three-dimensional gait analyses and energy consumption studies. From the three-dimensional gait analysis on poliomyelitis patients, a considerable amount of knee flexion during the swing phase was observed in controlled-knee gait, which resulted in approximately 33% less energy consumption than in locked-knee gait. The developed electromechanical KAFO in this study was helpful in poliomyelitis patients having partial or complete paralysis of the lower extremity, providing both stability in the stance and free swinging of the knee. This unit was efficient in the transfer of energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cerny K, Waters RL, Hislop H, Perry J (1980) Walking and wheelchair energetics in persons with paraplegia. Phys Ther 60:1133–1139

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coghlin JK, Robinson CE, Newmarch B, Jackson G (1980) Lower-extremity bracing in paraplegia: a follow-up study. J Paraplegia 18:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis RB, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR (1991) A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Human Mov Sci 10:575–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hebert JS, Liggins AB (2005) Gait evaluation of an automatic stance-control knee orthosis in a patient with postpoliomyelitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:1676–1680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hislop HJ, Montgomery J (2002) Daniels & Worthingham’s muscle testing: techniques of manual examination. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2–3

  6. Horn GW (1972) Electro-Control: An EMG-Controlled A/K Prosthesis. Med Biol Eng Comput 10:61–73

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hussey RW, Stauffer ES (1973) Spinal cord injury: requirements for ambulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 54:544–547

    Google Scholar 

  8. Inman V (1969) Conservation of energy and ambulation. Bull Prosthet Res 10:26

    Google Scholar 

  9. Irby SE (1994) A digital logic controlled electromechanical free knee brace. MS Thesis. San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA

  10. Irby SE, Bernhardt KA, Kaufman KR (2005) Gait of stance control orthosis users: the dynamic knee brace system. Prosthet Orthot Int 29(3):269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jessica RP, James GG (1994) Human walking: Second edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 47–72

  12. Krewer C, Muller F, Husemann B, Heller S, Quintern J, Koenig E (2007) The influence of different Lokomat walking conditions on the energy expenditure of hemiparetic patients and healthy subjects. Gait Posture 26(3):372–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leerdam NGA, Cool JC (1992) Load Measurement on the UTX-Orthosis. J Biomech 25:816–817

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lehmann JF, Stonebridge JB (1978) Knee lock device for knee ankle orthoses for spinal cord injured patients, an evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 59:430–437

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mattsson E, Bromstrom LA (1990) The increase in energy cost of walking with an immobilized knee or an unstable ankle. Scand J Rehabil Med 22:51–53

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mauch HA. (1967) Research and development in the field of artificial limbs. Bull Prosthet Res 1:143–169

    Google Scholar 

  17. McGhee RB, Tomovic R, Yang PY, Maclean IC (1978) An experimental study of a sensor-controlled external knee locking system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME-25(2):195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McMillan G, Kendrick KK, Michael JW, Aronson J, Horton JW (2004) Preliminary evidence for effectiveness of a stance control orthosis. J Prosthet Orthot 16:6–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Perry J (1967) The mechanics of walking: a clinical interpretation. In: Perry J, Hislop HJ (eds) Principles of the lower-extremity bracing. American Physical Therapy Association, New York, pp 9–32

    Google Scholar 

  20. Philips B, Zhao H (1993) Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol 5:36–45

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosman M, Spira E (1974) Paraplegic use of locking braces: a survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 55:310–314

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ryu T, Choi H, Choi H, Chung M (2006) A comparison of gait characteristics between Korean and Western people for establishing Korean gait reference data. Int J Ind Ergon 36:1023–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sawicki GS, Ferris DP (2006) Mechanics and control of a knee ankle foot orthosis (KAFO) powered with artificial pneumatic muscles. J Biomechanicas 39:S109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tomovic R, McGhee RB (1966) A finite state approach to the synthesis of bioengineering control systems. IEEE Trans Human Factors Electron HFE-7(2):65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Waters RL, Campbell J, Thomas L, Hugos L, Davis P (1982) Energy cost of walking in lower-extremity plaster casts. J Bone Joint Surg 64:896–899

    Google Scholar 

  26. Winter DA (1991) The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological. University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, pp 43–127

  27. Yang PY (1975) A study of electronically controlled orthotic knee joint systems. Ph.D. Dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

  28. Yakimovich T, Lemaire ED, Kofman J (2006) Preliminary kinematic evaluation of a new stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis. Clin Biomechancis 21:1081–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (02-PJ3-PG6-EV03-0004) and was also supported by the Regional Innovation Center Program, conducted by the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy of the Korean Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youngho Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, S., Kang, S., Cho, K. et al. Biomechanical effect of electromechanical knee–ankle–foot-orthosis on knee joint control in patients with poliomyelitis. Med Biol Eng Comput 46, 541–549 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0310-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0310-6

Keywords

Navigation