Skip to main content
Log in

Delta band contribution in cue based single trial classification of real and imaginary wrist movements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to classify different movements about the right wrist. Four different movements were performed: extension, flexion, pronation and supination. Two-class single trial classification was performed on six possible combinations of two movements (extension–flexion, extension–supination, extension–pronation, flexion–supination, flexion–pronation, pronation–supination). Both real and imaginary movements were analysed. The analysis was done in the joint time–frequency domain using the Gabor transform. Feature selection was based on the Davis-Bouldin Index (DBI) and feature classification was based on Elman’s recurrent neural networks (ENN). The best classification results, near 80% true positive rate, for imaginary movements were achieved for discrimination between extension and any other type of movement. The experiments were run with 10 able-bodied subjects. For some subjects, real movement classification rates higher than 80% were achieved for any combination of movements, though not simultaneously for all six combinations of movements. For classification of the imaginary movements, the results suggest that the type of movement and frequency band play an important role. Unexpectedly, the delta band was found to carry significant class-related information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (2006) Guideline 5. Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 23(2):107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (2006) Guideline 8. Guidelines for recording clinical EEG on digital media. J Clin Neurophysiol 23(2):122–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bezdek JC, Pal NR (1998) Some new indexes of cluster validity. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 28:301–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blankertz B, Dornhege G, Krauledat M, Muller KR, Kunzmann V, Losch F, Curio G (2006) The Berlin brain-bomputer interface: EEG-based communication without subject training. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14(2):147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134(1):9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng J, Yao J, Dewald JP (2005) Classification of the intention to generate a shoulder versus elbow torque by means of a time-frequency synthesized spatial patterns BCI algorithm. J Neural Eng 2(4):131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. do Nascimento OF, Nielsen KD, Voigt M (2005) Influence of directional orientations during gait initiation and stepping on movement-related cortical potentials. Behav Brain Res 161(1):141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elman JL (1990) Finding structure in time. Cogn Sci 14:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graimann B, Huggins JE, Levine SP, Pfurtscheller G (2004) Toward a direct brain interface based on human subdural recordings and wavelet-packet analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:954–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hermens HJ, Freriks B (1999) Surface electro-myography for non-invasive assesment of muscles recommandation European concerted action in the Biomedical Health and Research Programme (Biomed II) of the European Union. Recommandation for the recording of SEMG signal (CD-ROM)

  11. Hermens HJ, Freriks B (1999) Surface electro-myography for non-invasive assesment of muscles recommandation. European concerted action in the Biomedical Health and Research Programme (Biomed II) of the European Union. Signal Porcessing Recommendation. (CD-ROM)

  12. Hjort B (1975) An online transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. Electroenceph Clin Neuroph 39:526–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung TP, Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ. Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 111(10):1745–1758

  14. Kauhanen L, Nykopp T, Lehtonen J, Jylanki P, Heikkonen J, Rantanen P, Alaranta H, Sams M (2006) EEG and MEG brain-computer interface for tetraplegic patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14(2):190–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kronegg J, Chanel G, Voloshynovsky S, Pun T (2007) EEG-Based synchronized brain-computer interfaces: a modal for optimizing the number of mental tasks. IEEE Trans Neur Syst Rehab Eng 15:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Naeem M, Brunner C, Leeb R, Graimann B, Pfurtscheller G (2006) Separability of four-class motor imagery data using independent component analysis. J Neur Eng 3(3):208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahmoudi B, Erfanian A (2006) Electro-encephalogram based brain-computer interface: improved performance by mental practice and concentration skills. Med Biol Eng Comput 44(11):959–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Munk F (2000) Introduction to joint time-frequency analysis, Compendium for the course, Aalborg University, Denmark, pp 69–80

  19. Navarro I, Sepulveda F, Hubais B (2005) A comparison of time, frequency and ICA based features and five classifiers for wrist movement classification in EEG signals. In: Proceedings of 27th IEEE engineering EMBS conference, Shanghai, pp 2118–2121

  20. Neuper C, Scherer R, Reiner M, Pfurtscheller G (2005) Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25(3):668–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Onton J, Makeig S (2006) Information-based modeling of event-related brain dynamics. Prog Brain Res Elsevier 159:99–134

    Google Scholar 

  22. Palaniappan R (2006) Utilizing gamma band to improve mental task based brain-computer interface design. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14(3):299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pfurtscheller G, Brunner C, Schlogl A, Lopes da Silva FH (2006) Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks. Neuroimage 31(1):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C (2006) Future prospects of ERD/ERS in the context of brain-computer interface (BCI) developments. Prog Brain Res Elsevier 159:433–7

    Google Scholar 

  25. Qian S, Chen D (1996) Joint time-frequency analysis: methods and applications. Prentice Hall

  26. Ramoser H, Muller-Gerking J, Pfurtscheller G (2000) Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8(4):441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sepulveda F, Meckes M, Conway BA (2004) Cluster separation index suggests usefullness of EEG non-motor channels in detecting wrist movement direction intention. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICS’04, Singapore, vol 2, pp 943–947

  28. Stanstny J, Sovka P, Stancak A (2001) EEG signal classification. In: Proceedings of 23rd international EBMS annual conference, pp 220–223

  29. Talsma D, Woldorff MG (2005) Methods for the estimation and removal of artifacts and overlap in ERP waveforms, in event-related potentials. A method handbook, The MIT Press, pp 115–149

  30. Townsend G, Graimann B, Pfurtscheller GA (2006) A comparison of common spatial patterns with complex band power features in a four-class BCI experiment. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(4):642–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vidaurre C, Schlogl A, Cabeza R, Scherer R, Pfurtscheller G (2006) A fully on-line adaptive BCI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(6):1214–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vučkovič A, Sepulveda F (2006) EEG single-trial classification of four classes of imaginary wrist movements based on Gabor coefficients. In: Proceedings of 3rd international BCI workshop, Graz, Austria, pp 26–27

  33. Vučkovič A, Sepulveda F (2008) Quantification and visualisation of differences between two motor tasks based on energy density maps for brain computer interface applications. Clin Neurophysiol 119(2):446–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang G, Wang Z, Chen W, Zhuang J (2006) Classification of surface EMG signals using optimal wavelet packet method based on Davies-Bouldin criterion. Med Biol Eng Comp 44:865–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zygierewicz J, Durka PJ, Klekowicz H, Franaszczuk PJ, Crone NE (2005) Computationally efficient approaches to calculating significant ERD/ERS changes in the time-frequency plane. J Neurosci Methods 145(1–2):267–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the EPSRC through Grant GR/T09903/01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandra Vuckovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vuckovic, A., Sepulveda, F. Delta band contribution in cue based single trial classification of real and imaginary wrist movements. Med Biol Eng Comput 46, 529–539 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0345-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0345-8

Keywords

Navigation