Skip to main content
Log in

Tikhonov regularized solutions for improvement of signal-to-noise ratio in case of auditory-evoked potentials

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, standard Tikhonov regularization (STR) Technique and the subspace regularization (SR) method have been applied to remove the additive EEG noise on average auditory-evoked potential (EP) signals. In methodological manner, the difference between these methods is the formation of regularization matrices which are used to solve the weighted problem of EP estimation. Those methods are compared to ensemble averaging (EA) with respect to signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) improvement in experimental studies, simulations and pseudo-simulations. The results of tests no superiority of the SR in comparison to STR has been observed. In addition, the STR is found to be less computational complex. Moreover, results support the theoretical fact that the STR was introduced to be optimum for smooth solutions whereas the SR allows sharp variations in solutions. Thus, the STR is found to be more useful in removing the noise with the average signal remaining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Aydın S (2008) Comparison of basic linear filters in extracting auditory evoked potentials. Turk J Elec Eng 16:72–728

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bronzino JD (2000) The biomedical engineering handbook. CRC Press

  3. Daucbechies I (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets. SIAM

  4. Davila CE, Srebro R (2000) Subspace averaging of steady-state visual evoked potentials. IEEE Trans BME 47:720–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Furst M, Blau A (1991) Optimal a posteriori time domain filter for average evoked potentials. IEEE Trans BME 38:827–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta L, Molfese DL (1996) Nonlinear alignment and averaging for estimating the evoked potential. IEEE Trans BME 43:34–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen PC (1994) Regularization tools, numerical algorithms

  8. Karjalainen PA, Kaipio JP (1999) Subspace regularization method for the single-trial estimation of evoked potential. IEEE Trans BME 46:849–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiu W, Fung SM, Chan HY, et al (2002) Adaptive filtering of evoked potentials with radial basis function neural network pre-filter. IEEE Trans BME 49:225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Quiroga RQ, Garcia H (2003) Single trial event related potentials with wavelet de-noising. EEG Clin Neuroph 114:376–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shooshtari P, Mohamadi G et al (2007) Removing ocular artifacts from EEG signals using adaptive filtering and ARMAX modeling. Med Biol Eng Comput 45(5):495–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY (1977) Solution of ill-posed problems. Winston and Sons

  13. Turetsky BI, Raz J (1988) Noise and signal power and their effects on evoked potential estimation. Clin Neuroph 71:310–318

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vauhkonen M (1998) Tikhonov regularization and prior information in electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imag 17:285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serap Aydın.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aydın, S. Tikhonov regularized solutions for improvement of signal-to-noise ratio in case of auditory-evoked potentials. Med Biol Eng Comput 46, 1051–1056 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0385-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0385-0

Keywords

Navigation