Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Novel electrode–skin interface for breast electrical impedance scanning

  • Special issue - Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high false-positive rate in clinical examinations limits the application of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) on breast cancer detection. One of the reasons is the non-uniform electrode–skin interface, which induces the ‘contact artifact’ in the results. To decrease the ‘contact artifact’, we designed a novel disposable electrode–skin interface [cotton fine grid thin layer (CFGTL)-interface], which is 0.2-mm thick and has a conductivity similar to that of normal breast tissue. The performance of the CFGTL-interface was evaluated by comparing it with the ultrasound gel interface generally used in EIS examinations. The test was conducted on 50 healthy female volunteers using two different interfaces separately, and a paired comparison method was used to analyze the effect of the CFGTL-interface on EIS measuring data. The results showed that the CFGTL-interface could effectively decrease the variation and the range of data fluctuation, which suggested that CFGTL-interface can decrease the ‘contact artifact’ and increase the accuracy of the examination. The CFGTL-interface appears to be an effective electrode–skin interface for breast EIS examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Assenheimer M, Laver-Moskovitz O, Malonek D et al (2001) The T-SCANTM technology: electrical impedance as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer detection. Physiol Meas 22(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boone KG, Holder DS (1996) Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study. Med Biol Eng Comput 34(5):351–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gabriel S, Lau RW, Gabriel C (1996) The dielectric properties of biological properties: measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Phys Med Biol 41:2251–2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilad O, Horesh L, Holder DS (2007) Design of electrodes and current limits for low-frequency electrical impedance tomography of the brain. Med Biol Eng Comput 45(7):621–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Glichman YA, Filo O, Nachaliel U, Lenington S, Amin-Spector S, Ginor R (2002) Novel EIS postprocessing algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:710–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo Y, Sivaramakrishna R, Lu CC, Suri JS, Laxminarayan S (2006) Breast image registration techniques: a survey. Med Biol Eng Comput 44:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ji Z, Dong X, Shi X, You F, Fu F, Liu R (2007) Study of electrical impedance scanning system for breast screening. In: Proceedings of first international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering, Wuhan, pp 1114–1116

  8. Jossinet J (1996) Variability of impedivity in normal and pathological breast tissue. Med Biol Eng Comput 34:346–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jossinet J (1998) The impedivity of freshly excised human breast tissue. Physiol Meas 19:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jossinet J, Schmitt M (1999) A review of parameters for the bioelectrical characterization of breast tissue. Ann N Y Acad Sci 873:30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Malich A, Fritsch T, Anderson R, Boehm T, Fresmeyer MG, Fleck M, Kaiser WA (2000) Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results. Eur Radiol 10:1555–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Malich A, Bohm T, Facius M, Freessmeyer M, Fleck M, Anderson R, Kaiser WA (2001) Additional value of electrical impedance scanning: experience of 240 histologically-proven breast lesions. Eur J Cancer 37:2324–2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malich A, Facius M, Anderson R, Bottcher J, Sauner D, Hansch A, Marx C, Petrovitch A, Pfleiderer S, Kaiser W (2003) Influence of size and depth on accuracy of electrical impedance scanning. Eur Radiol 13:2441–2446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malich A, Bohm T, Facius M, Kleinteich I, Fleck M, Anderson R, Kaiser WA (2003) Electrical impedance scanning as a new imaging modality in breast cancer detection—a short review of clinical value on breast application, limitations and perspectives. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 497:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McAdams ET, Jossinet J, Lackermeier A, Risacher F (1996) Factors affecting electrode–gel–skin interface impedance in electrical impedance tomography. Med Biol Eng Comput 34:397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng EY, Ng WK (2006) Parametric study of the biopotential equation for breast tumour identification using ANOVA and Taguchi method. Med Biol Eng Comput 44:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Piperno G, Frei EH, Moshitzky M (1990) Breast cancer screening by impedance measurements. Front Med Biol Eng 2:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stuchly SS, Barr JB, Swarup A (1988) Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scholz B, Anderson R (2000) On electrical impedance scanning principles and simulations. Electromedica 68:35–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of the People’s Republic of China under Grant 50337020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Electronic Engineering Department, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, 710032, China

    Zhenyu Ji, Xiuzhen Dong, Xuetao Shi, Fusheng You, Feng Fu & Ruigang Liu

Authors
  1. Zhenyu Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiuzhen Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xuetao Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fusheng You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Feng Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ruigang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuzhen Dong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ji, Z., Dong, X., Shi, X. et al. Novel electrode–skin interface for breast electrical impedance scanning. Med Biol Eng Comput 47, 1045–1052 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0516-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0516-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation