Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of mean arterial pressure from the oscillometric cuff pressure: comparison of different techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mean arterial pressure (MAP) is determined in most automated oscillometric blood pressure devices, but its derivation has been little studied. In this research, different techniques were studied and compared with the auscultatory technique. Auscultatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) were obtained in 55 healthy subjects by two trained observers, and auscultatory MAP was estimated. Automated MAP was determined by six techniques from oscillometric cuff pressures recorded digitally and simultaneously during manual measurement. MAPs were derived from the peak and foot of the largest oscillometric pulse, and from time domain curves fitted to the sequence of oscillometric pulse amplitudes (4th order and three versions of the 6th order polynomial curve). The agreement between automated and auscultatory MAPs was assessed. Compared with the auscultatory MAP, the automated MAP from the baseline cuff pressure at the peak of the 6th order polynomial curve had the smallest mean paired difference (−1.0 mmHg), and smallest standard deviation of paired differences (3.7 mmHg). These values from the peak of the largest oscillometric pulse were −1.3 and 6.2 mmHg, respectively. Determining MAP from a model of the oscillometric pulse waveform had the smallest differences from the manual auscultatory technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amoore JN, Geake WB, Scott DHT (1998) The effects of pulse rate, artifact and pulse strength on oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure measurements. J Clin Eng 23:103–109

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amoore JN, Lemesre Y, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, Murray A (2008) Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to the differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements. J Hypertens 26:35–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beevers G, Lip GY, O’Brien E (2001) ABC of hypertension: blood pressure measurement: Part I-sphygmomanometry: factors common to all techniques. BMJ 322:981–985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berne RM, Levy MN (1998) The arterial system. In physiology. Mosby Inc, St Louis, pp 415–428

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bos WJ, Verrij E, Vincent HH, Westerhof BE, Parati G, van Montfrans GA (2007) How to assess mean blood pressure properly at the brachial artery level. J Hypertens 25:751–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chemla D, Brahimi M, Nitenberg A (2007) Thumb-rule for the proper assessment of mean blood pressure at the brachial artery level: what should be changed? J Hypertens 25:1740–1741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cnossen JS, Vollebregt KC, de Vrieze N, ter Riet G, Mol BW, Franx A, Khan KS, van der Post JA (2008) Accuracy of mean arterial pressure and blood pressure measurements in predicting pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 336:1117–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Geddes LA, Voelz M, Combs C, Reiner D, Babbs CF (1982) Characterization of the oscillometric method for measuring indirect blood pressure. Ann Biomed Eng 10:271–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Graves JW, Tibor M, Murtagh B, Klein L, Sheps SG (2003) The Accoson Greenlight 300TM, the first non-automated mercury free blood pressure device to pass the International Protocol for blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 9:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guyton AC (1986) Textbook of medical physiology, 7th edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ira S (1996) Human physiology, 5th edn. Wm C Brown Publishers, Iowa, pp 414–415

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO 81060-2 (2009) Non-invasive sphygmomanometers —Part 2: Clinical validation of automated measurement type

  13. Jones DW, Appel LJ, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ, Lenfant C (2003) Measuring blood pressure accurately: New and persistent challenges. JAMA 289:1027–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazarashvili LT (1993) Interference resistance in automated oscillometric sphygmomanometers. Biomed Eng 27:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meaney E, Alva F, Moguel R, Meaney A, Alva J, Webel R (2000) Formula and nomogram for the sphygmomanometric calculation of the mean arterial pressure. Heart 84:64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mieke S, Seemann R, Riedel W, Murray A, Amoore JN (2009) A simulator to test automated non-invasive sphygmomanometers. IFMBE Proceedings 25/VII, pp 356–358

  17. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ (2005) Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Part 1: Blood pressure measurement in humans. A statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association Council on high blood pressure research. Hypertension 45:142–161

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramsey M (1979) Noninvasive automatic determination of mean arterial pressure. Med Biol Eng Comput 17:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramsey M (1991) Blood pressure monitoring: Automated oscillometric devices. J Clin Monit Comput 7:56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Razminia M, Trivedi A, Molnar J, Elbzour M, Guerrero M, Salem Y, Ahmed A, Khosla S, Lubell DL (2004) Validation of a new formula for mean arterial pressure calculation: the new formula is superior to the standard formula. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63:419–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sesso HD, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, Gaziano JM, Manson JAE, Glynn RJ (2000) Systolic and diastolic blood pressure pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure as predictors of cardiovascular risk in men. Hypertension 36:801–807

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Horn RN, Kahlke RJ, Taylor LA, Dorsett TJ (2001) Noninvasive blood pressure performance: a reproducible method for quantifying motion artifact tolerance in oscillometry. Biomed Instrum Technol 35:395–414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Verrij EA, Vincent HH, Bos WJ (2008) Rule of thumb to calculate mean arterial pressure at the brachial artery level. J Hypertens 26:1043–1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamakoshi K, Shimazu H, Shibata M, Kamiya A (1982) New oscillometric method for indirect measurement of systolic and mean arterial pressure in the human finger. Part 2: correlation study. Med Biol Eng Comput 20:314–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng D, Murray A (2008) Estimation of mean blood pressure from oscillometric and manual methods. Comput Cardiol 35:941–944

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr Dingchang Zheng is funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dingchang Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, D., Amoore, J.N., Mieke, S. et al. Estimation of mean arterial pressure from the oscillometric cuff pressure: comparison of different techniques. Med Biol Eng Comput 49, 33–39 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0694-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0694-y

Keywords

Navigation