Skip to main content
Log in

A generalized calibration procedure for in vivo transit dosimetry using siemens electronic portal imaging devices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A practical and accurate generalized in vivo dosimetry procedure has been implemented for Siemens linacs supplying 6, 10, and 15 MV photon beams, equipped with aSi electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). The in vivo dosimetry method makes use of correlation ratios between EPID transit signal, s 0t (TPR,w,L), and phantom mid-plane dose, D 0(TPR,w,L), as functions of phantom thickness, w, square field dimensions, L, and tissue-phantom ratio TPR20,10. The s 0t (TPR,w,L) and D 0(TPR,w,L) values were defined to be independent of the EPID sensitivity and monitor unit calibration, while their dependence on TPR20,10 was investigated to determine a set of generalized correlation ratios to be used for beams with TPR20,10 falling in the examined range. This way, other radiotherapy centers can use the method with no need to locally perform the whole set of measurements in solid water phantoms, required to implement it. Tolerance levels for 3D conformal treatments, ranging between ±5 and ±6% according to tumor type and location, were estimated for comparison purposes between reconstructed isocenter dose, D iso, and treatment planning system (TPS) computed dose D iso,TPS. Finally a dedicated software, interfaceable with record and verify (R&V) systems used in the centers, was developed to obtain in vivo dosimetry results in less than 2 min after beam delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Essers M, Mijnheer BJ (1999) In vivo dosimetry during external photon beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43:245–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fidanzio A, Mameli A, Placidi E et al (2008) EPID cine acquisition mode for in vivo dosimetry in dynamic arc radiation therapy. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 266:658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huyskens DP, Bogaerts R, Verstrete J, Loof M, Nystrom H, Fiorino C, Broggi S, Jornet N, Ribas M, Thwaites DI (2001) Practical guidelines for the implementation of in vivo dosimetry radiotherapy with photon beams (entrance dose). Physics for clinical radiotherapy. ESTRO Booklet n.5

  4. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2004) Absorbed dose in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water IAEA TRS 398

  5. Kroonwijk M, Pasma KL, Quint S, Koper PC, Visser AG, Heijmen BJ (1998) In vivo dosimetry for prostate cancer patients using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID); demonstration of internal organ motion. Radiother Oncol 49:125–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Larin F (1968) Radiation effects in semiconductor devices. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Louwe RJ, Damen EM, van Herk M, Minken AW, Torzsok O, Mijnheer BJ (2003) Three-dimensional dose reconstruction of breast cancer treatment using portal imaging. Med Phys 30:2376–2389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Louwe R, McDermott L, Sonke J, Tielenburg R, Wendling M, van Herk M, Mijnheer B (2004) The long-term stability of amorphous silicon flat panel imaging devices for dosimetry purposes. Med Phys 31:285–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McDermott LN, Wendling M, van Asselen B et al (2006) Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pretreatment dose verification. Med Phys 33:3921–3930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McDermott LN, Nijsten SM, Sonke JJ, Partridge M, van Herk M, Mijnheer BJ (2006) Comparison of ghosting effects for three commercial a-Si EPIDs. Med Phys 33:2448–2451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McDermott LN, Wendling M, Sonke JJ, van Herk M, Mijnheer BJ (2007) Replacing pretreatment verification with in vivo EPIDdosimetry for prostate IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67:1568–1577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McDermott LN, Wendling M, Nijkamp J et al (2008) 3D in vivo dose verification of entire hypo-fractionated IMRT treatments using an EPID and cone-beam CT. Radiother Oncol 86:35–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mijnheer B (2008) State of the art of in vivo dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 131:117–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nijsten S, Mijnheer B, Dekker A, Lambin P, Minken A (2007) Routine individualised patient dosimetry using electronic portal imaging devices. Radiother Oncol 83:65–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nijsten SM, van Elmpt WJ, Jacobs M et al (2007) A global calibration model for a-Si EPIDs used for transit dosimetry. Med Phys 34:3872–3884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Partridge M, Ebert M, Hesse BM (2002) IMRT verification by threedimensional dose reconstruction from portal beam measurements. Med Phys 29:1847–1858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Partridge M, Hesse B, Muller L (2002) A performance comparison of direct and indirect detection flat-panel imagers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 484:351–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pasma KL, Heijmen BJ, Kroonwijk M, Visser AG (1998) Portal dose image (PDI) prediction for dosimetric treatment verification in radiotherapy. I. An algorithm for open beams. Med Phys 25:830–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pasma KL, Kroonwijk M, Quint S, Visser AG, Heijmen BJM (1999) Transit dosimetry with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for 115 prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:1297–1303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pasma KL, Vieira SC, Heijmen BJ (2002) Portal dose image prediction for dosimetric treatment verification in radiotherapy. II. An algorithm for wedged beams. Med Phys 29:925–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Piermattei A, Fidanzio A, Stimato G, Azario L, Grimaldi L, D’Onofrio G, Cilla S (2006) In vivo dosimetry by an aSi-based EPID. Med Phys 33:4414–4422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Piermattei A, Fidanzio A, Azario L et al (2007) Application of a practical method for the isocenter point in vivo dosimetry by a transit signal. Phys Med Biol 52:5101–5117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piermattei A, Cilla S, Grimaldi L, Viola P, Frattarolo L, D’Onofrio G et al (2008) Real time dosimetry reconstruction for the breath hold radiotherapy technique: an initial experience. Acta Oncol 47:1414–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Piermattei A, Fidanzio A, Azario L, Greco F, Mameli A, Cilla S, Grimaldi L, D’Onofrio G, Augelli BG, Stimato G, Gaudino D, Ramella S, D’Angelillo R, Cellini F, Trodella L (2009) In patient dose reconstruction using a cine acquisition for dynamic arc radiation therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput 47(4):425–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Piermattei A, Cilla S, Grimaldi L, Sabatino D et al (2009) Integration between in vivo dosimetry and image guided radiotherapy for lung tumors. Med Phys 36(6):2206–2214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Piermattei A, Fidanzio A, Cilla S, Greco F, Azario L, Sabatino D, Grusio M, Cozzolino M, Fusco V (2010) Dose-guided radiotherapy for lung tumors. Med Biol Eng Comput 48(1):79–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schneider U, Pedroni E, Lomax A (1996) The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning Phys. Med Biol 41:111–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Siewerdsen J, Jaffray D (1999) A ghost story: spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager. Med Phys 26:1624–1641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. SSI (2000) The Swedish Radiation Protection Institute’s regulations on radiation therapy. SSTFS Swedish Radiation Protection Authority 4

  30. TableCurve 3D (2004) Ver. 4. Systat. Software, Inc, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  31. Talamonti C, Casati M, Bucciolini M (2006) Pretreatment verification of IMRT absolute dose distributions using a commercial a-Si EPID. Med Phys 33:4367–4378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. van Elmpt WJ, Nijsten SM, Mijnheer BJ, Minken AW (2005) Experimental verification of a portal dose prediction model. Med Phys 32:2805–2818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van Elmpt W, McDermott L, Nijsten S, Wendling M, Lambin P, Mijnheer B (2008) A literature review of electronic portal imaging for radiotherapy dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 88:289–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Esch A, Vanstraelen B, Verstraete J, Kutcher G, Huyskens D (2001) Pretreatment dosimetric verification by means of a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device during dynamic delivery of intensity modulated treatment fields. Radiother Oncol 60:181–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Esch A, Depuydt T, Huyskens DP (2004) The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields. Radiother Oncol 71:223–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Venselaar JLM, Heukelom S, Jager HN, Mijnheer BJ, van Gasteren JJ, van Kleffens HJ, van der Laarse R, Westermann CF (1997) Is there a need for a revised table of equivalent square fields for the determination of phantom scatter correction factors? Phys Med Biol 42:2369–2381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Winkler P, Hefner A, Georg D (2005) Dose–response characteristics of an amorphous silicon EPID. Med Phys 32:3095–3105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Fidanzio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fidanzio, A., Greco, F., Gargiulo, L. et al. A generalized calibration procedure for in vivo transit dosimetry using siemens electronic portal imaging devices. Med Biol Eng Comput 49, 373–383 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0699-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0699-6

Keywords

Navigation