Abstract
With the increasing interest of using inertial measurement units (IMU) in human biomechanics studies, methods dealing with inertial sensor measurement errors become more and more important. Pre-test calibration and in-test error compensation are commonly used to minimize the sensor errors and improve the accuracy of the walking speed estimation results. However, the performance of a given sensor error compensation method does not only depend on the accuracy of the calibration or the sensor error evaluation, but also strongly relies on the selected sensor error model. The best performance could be achieved only when the essential components of sensor errors are included and compensated. Two new sensor error models, with the concerns about sensor acceleration measurement biases and sensor attachment misalignment, have been developed. The performance of these two error models were evaluated in the shank-mounted IMU-based walking speed/inclination estimation algorithm with a comparison of an existing error model. The treadmill walking experiment, conducted at both level and incline conditions, demonstrated the importance of sensor error model selection on the spatio-temporal gait parameter estimation performance. Accurate walking inclination estimation was made possible with a newly developed sensor error model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aminian K, Najafi B, Bula C, Leyvraz P, Robert P (2002) Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. J Biomech 35(5):689–699
Barbour N, Schmidt G (2001) Inertial sensor technology trends. IEEE Sens J 1(4):332–339
Bebek O, Suster M, Rajgopal S, Fu M, Huang X, Cavusoglu M, Young D, Mehregany M, van den Bogery A, Mastrangelo C (2010) Personal navigation via high-resolution gait-corrected inertial measurement units. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 59(11):3018–3027
Brennan A, Zhang J, Deluzio K, Li Q (2011) Quantification of inertial sensor-based 3D joint angle measurement accuracy using an instrumented gimbal. Gait Posture 34(3):320–323
Catalfamo P, Ghoussayni S, Ewins D (2010) Gait event detection on level ground and incline walking using a rate gyroscope. Sensors 10(6):5683–5702
Cutti A, Ferrari A, Garofalo P, Raggi M, Cappello A, Ferrari A (2010) Outwalk: a protocol for clinical gait analysis based on inertial and magnetic sensors. Med Biol Eng Comput 48(1):17–25
Ferraris F, Grimaldi U, Parvis M (1995) Procedure for effortless in-field calibration of three-axis rate gyros and accelerometers. Sens Mater 7(5):311–311
Greene B, McGrath D, O’Neill R, O’Donovan K, Burns A, Caulfield B (2010) An adaptive gyroscope-based algorithm for temporal gait analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 48(12):1251–1260
Hartmann A, Murer K, de Bie R, de Bruin E (2009) Reproducibility of spatio-temporal gait parameters under different conditions in older adults using a trunk tri-axial accelerometer system. Gait Posture 30(3):351–355
Henriksen M, Lund H, Moe-Nilssen R, Bliddal H, Danneskiod-Samsře B (2004) Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait Posture 19(3):288–297
Jasiewicz J, Allum J, Middleton J, Barriskill A, Condie P, Purcell B, Li R (2006) Gait event detection using linear accelerometers or angular velocity transducers in able-bodied and spinal-cord injured individuals. Gait Posture 24(4):502–509
Khan A, Lee Y, Lee S, Kim T (2010) Accelerometer’s position independent physical activity recognition system for long-term activity monitoring in the elderly. Med Biol Eng Comput 48(12):1271–1279
Lau H, Tong K (2008) The reliability of using accelerometer and gyroscope for gait event identification on persons with dropped foot. Gait Posture 27(2):248–257
Lee J, Park E (2011) Quasi real-time gait event detection using shank-attached gyroscopes. Med Biol Eng Comput 49(6):707–712
Li Q, Young M, Naing V, Donelan JM (2010) Walking speed estimation using a shank-mounted inertial measurement unit. J Biomech 43(8):1640–1643
Lotters J, Schipper J, Veltink P, Olthuis W, Bergveld P (1998) Procedure for in-use calibration of triaxial accelerometers in medical applications. Sens Actuat A: Phys 68(1–3):221–228
Mayagoitia R, Nene A, Veltink P (2002) Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. J Biomech 35(4):537–542
Miyazaki S (1997) Long-term unrestrained measurement of stride length and walking velocity utilizing a piezoelectric gyroscope. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44(8):753–759
Ojeda L, Borenstein J (2007) Non-GPS navigation for security personnel and first responders. J Navig 60(3):391–407
Sabatini A (2006) Computational intelligence for movement sciences: neural networks, support vector machines and other emerging techniques. In: Inertial sensing in biomechanics: a survey of computational techniques bridging motion analysis and personal navigation. Idea Group Inc, pp 70–100
Sabatini AM, Martelloni C, Scapellato S, Cavallo F (2005) Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(3):486–494
Scapellato S, Cavallo F, Martelloni C, Sabatini A (2005) In-use calibration of body-mounted gyroscopes for applications in gait analysis. Sens Actuat A: Phys 123:418–422
Yang S, Li Q (2012) Imu-based ambulatory walking speed estimation in constrained treadmill and overground walking. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 15(3):313–322
Acknowledgments
We would like to gratefully acknowledge the support from NSERC discovery grant and Queen’s SARC grant. We also thanks the reviewers for their constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, S., Laudanski, A. & Li, Q. Inertial sensors in estimating walking speed and inclination: an evaluation of sensor error models. Med Biol Eng Comput 50, 383–393 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0887-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0887-7