Skip to main content
Log in

Corrective distal radius osteotomy: including bilateral differences in 3-D planning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After a fracture of the distal radius, the bone segments may heal in a suboptimal position. This condition may lead to a reduced hand function, pain and finally osteoarthritis, sometimes requiring corrective surgery. Recent studies report computer-assisted 3-D planning techniques in which the mirrored contralateral unaffected radius serves as reference for planning the position of the distal radius before corrective osteotomy surgery. Bilateral asymmetry, however, may introduce length errors into this type of preoperative planning that can be compensated for by taking into account the concomitant ulnae asymmetry. This article investigates a method for planning a correction osteotomy of the distal radius, while compensating for bilateral length differences using a linear regression model that describes the relationship between radii and ulnae asymmetry. The method is evaluated quantitatively using CT scans of 20 healthy individuals, and qualitatively using CT scans of patients suffering from a malunion of the distal radius. The improved planning method reduces absolute length deviations by a factor of two and markedly reduces positioning variation, from 2.9 ± 2.1 to 1.5 ± 0.6 mm. We expect the method to be of great value for future 3-D planning of a corrective distal radius osteotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altissimi M, Antenucci R, Fiacca C, Mancini GG (1986) Long-term results of conservative treatment of fractures of the distal radius. Clin Orthop Rel Res 206:202–210

    Google Scholar 

  2. Athwal GS, Ellis RE, Small CF, Pichora DR (2003) Computer-assisted distal radius osteotomy. J Hand Surg Am 28(6):951–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Croitoru H, Ellis RE, Prihar R, Small CF, Pichora DR (2001) Fixation-based surgery: a new technique for distal radius osteotomy. Comp Aid Surg 6:160–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dobbe JGG, Strackee SD, Schreurs AW, Jonges R, Carelsen B, Vroemen JC, Grimbergen CA, Streekstra GJ (2011) Computer-assisted planning and navigation for corrective distal radius osteotomy, based on pre- and intraoperative imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58(1):182–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dumont CE, Thalmann R, Macy JC (2002) The effect of rotational malunion of the radius and the ulna on supination and pronation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(7):1070–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Freedman DM, Edwards GS Jr, Willems MJ, Meals RA (1998) Right versus left symmetry of ulnar variance. A radiographic assessment, Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstein H, Poole C, Safko J (2001) Classical mechanics, 3rd edn. Edison Wesley, San Francisco, pp 191–198. ISBN 0201657023

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hollevoet N, Van Maele G, Van Seymortier P, Verdonk R (2000) Comparison of palmar tilt, radial inclination and ulnar variance in left and right wrists. J Hand Surg Br 25:431–433

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hollevoet N, Verdonk R (2003) The functional importance of malunion in distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 69:239–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mann FA, Wilson AJ, Gilula LA (1992) Radiographic evaluation of the wrist: what does the hand surgeon want to know? Radiology 184:15–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paley D (2005) Principles of deformity correction, 1st edition, Springer, Verlag, ISBN 3-540-41665-X

  12. Patton MW (2004) Distal radius malunion. J Am Soc Surg Hand 4(4):266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rieger M, Gabl M, Gruber H, Jaschke WR, Mallouhi A (2005) CT virtual reality in the preoperative workup of malunited distal radius fractures: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 15:792–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuind F, Alemzadey S, Stallenberg B, Burny F (1996) Does the normal contralateral wrist provide the best reference for x-ray film measurements of the pathologic wrist? J Hand Surg 21:24–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vroemen JC, Dobbe JG, Jonges R, Strackee SD, Streekstra GJ (2012) Three-dimensional assessment of bilateral symmetry of the radius and ulna for planning corrective surgeries. J Hand Surg Am 37(5):982–988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Westphal R, Winkelbach S, Wahl F, Gösling T, Oszwald M, Hüfner T, Krettek C (2009) Robot-assisted long bone fracture reduction. Int J Robot Res 28(10):1259–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by ITEA-2 project 09039, Mediate.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. G. G. Dobbe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dobbe, J.G.G., Vroemen, J.C., Strackee, S.D. et al. Corrective distal radius osteotomy: including bilateral differences in 3-D planning. Med Biol Eng Comput 51, 791–797 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1049-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1049-2

Keywords

Navigation