Abstract
Despite recent advances in leg prosthetics, transfemoral amputees still experience limitations in postural control and gait symmetry. It has been hypothesized that artificial sensory information might improve the integration of the prosthesis into the human sensory-motor control loops and, thus, reduce these limitations. In three transfemoral amputees, we investigated the effect of Electrotactile Moving Sensation for Sensory Augmentation (EMSSA) without training and present preliminary findings. Experimental conditions included standing with open/closed eyes on stable/unstable ground as well as treadmill walking. For standing conditions, spatiotemporal posturographic measures and sample entropy were derived from the center of pressure. For walking conditions, step length and stance duration were calculated. Conditions without feedback showed effects congruent with findings in the literature, e.g., asymmetric weight bearing and step length, and validated the collected data. During standing, with EMSSA a tendency to influence postural control in a negative way was found: Postural control was less effective and less efficient and the prosthetic leg was less involved. Sample entropy tended to decrease, suggesting that EMSSA demanded increased attention. During walking, with EMSSA no persistent positive effect was found. This contrasts the positive subjective assessment and the positive effect on one subject’s step length.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arieta AH, Yokoi H, Arai T, Yu W (2006) Study on the effects of electrical stimulation on the pattern recognition for an EMG prosthetic application. In: 27th annual international conference of the engineering in medicine and biology society, 2005. IEEE-EMBS 2005. IEEE, pp 6919–6922
Arieta AH, Afthinos M, Dermitzakis K (2011) Apparent moving sensation recognition in prosthetic applications. Proc Comput Sci 7:133–135
Bach-y Rita P (2004) Tactile sensory substitution studies. Ann NY Acad Sci 1013:83–91
Bamberg SJM, Carson RJ, Stoddard G, Dyer PS, Webster JB (2010) The lower extremity ambulation feedback system for analysis of gait asymmetries: preliminary design and validation results. J Prosthet Orthot 22:31–36
Bellmann M, Schmalz T, Ludwigs E, Blumentritt S (2012) Stair ascent with an innovative microprocessor-controlled exoprosthetic knee joint. Biomed Eng 57:435–444
Blank A, Okamura AM, Kuchenbecker KJ (2010) Identifying the role of proprioception in upper-limb prosthesis control: studies on targeted motion. ACM Trans Appl Percept 7(3):15
Borg FG, Laxaback G (2010) Entropy of balance—some recent results. J Neuroeng Rehabil 7:1–11
Clippinger F, McElhaney J, Maxwell M, Vaughn D, Horton G, Bright L (1981) Prosthetic sensory feedback lower extremity. Newsl Pros Orth Clin 5:1–3
Clippinger FW, Seaber AV, McElhaney JH, Harrelson JM, Maxwell GM (1982) Afferent sensory feedback for lower extremity prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 169:202–206
Davis BL, Cavanagh PR (1993) Decomposition of superimposed ground reaction forces into left and right force profiles. J Biomech 26:593–597
Donker SF, Roerdink M, Greven AJ, Beek PJ (2007) Regularity of center-of-pressure trajectories depends on the amount of attention invested in postural control. Exp Brain Res 18:1–11
Duclos C, Roll R, Kavounoudias A, Mongeau JP, Roll JP, Forget R (2009) Postural changes after sustained neck muscle contraction in persons with a lower leg amputation. J Electromygr Kinesiol 19(4):e214–e222
Fahramand F, Rezacian T, Narimani R, Dinan PH (2006) Kinematic and dynamic analysis of the gait cycle of above-knee amputees. Sci Iran 13(3):261–271
Fan RE, Culjat MO, Kim CH, Franco ML, Boryk R, Bisley JW, Dutson E, Grundfest WS (2008) A haptic feedback system for lower-limb prostheses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 16:270–277
Fan R, Wottawa C, Mulgaonkar A, Boryk R, Sander T, Wyatt M, Dutson E, Grundfest W, Culjat M (2009) Pilot testing of a haptic feedback rehabilitation system on a lower-limb amputee. In: ICME international conference on complex medical engineering, 2009. CME, pp 1–4
Fernie GR, Holliday P (1978) Postural sway in amputees and normal subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(7):895–8
Fuhr T, Schmidt G (1999) Design of a patient-mounted multi-sensor system for lower extremity neuroprostheses. In: Proceedings of the first joint BMES/EMBS conference serving humanity, advancing technology, p 662
Gailey R, Allen K, Castles J, Kucharik J, Roeder M (2008) Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use. J Rehabil Res Dev 45(1):15
Geurts A, Mulder T (1992) Reorganisation of postural control following lower limb amputation: theoretical considerations and implications for rehabilitation. Physiother Theory Pract 8:145–157
Giggins OM, Persson UM, Caulfield B (2013) Biofeedback in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 10(1):60
Gilbert J, Maxwell G, George R Jr, McElhaney J (1982) Technical note—auditory feedback of knee angle for amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 6:103–104
Goldberger A, Amaral L, Glass L (2000) Physiobank, physiotoolkit, and physionet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101:215–220
Hlavackova P, Fristios J, Cuisinier R, Pinsault N, Janura M, Vuillerme N (2009) Effects of mirror feedback on upright stance control in elderly transfemoral amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(11):1960–1963
Hlavackova P, Franco C, Diot B, Vuillerme N (2011) Contribution of each leg to the control of unperturbed bipedal stance in lower limb amputees: new insights using entropy. PLoS One 6:1–4
Izumi T, Hoshimiya N (1988) A presentation method of a traveling image for the sensory feedback for control of the paralyzed upper extremity. Syst Comput Jpn 19(8):1625–1632
Jaegers SM, Arendzen JH, de Jongh HJ (1995) Prosthetic gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees: a kinematic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76:736–743
Kaczmarek KA (1995) Sensory augmentation and substitution. CRC handbook of biomedical engineering. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 2100–2109
Kaczmarek K, Webster J, Bach-y Rita P, Tompkins W (1991) Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 38(1):1–16
Kawamura J, Sueda O, Harada K, Nishihara K, Isobe S (1981) Sensory feedback systems for the lower-limb prosthesis. J Osaka Rosai Hosp 5:104–112
Kulkarni J, Toole C, Hirons R, Wright S, Morris J (1996) Falls in patients with lower limb amputations: prevalence and contributing factors. Physiotherapy 82:130–136
Lake DE, Richman JS, Griffin MP, Moorman JR (2002) Sample entropy analysis of neonatal heart rate variability. J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 10:789–797
Martinez-Villalpando EC, Mooney L, Elliott G, Herr H (2011) Antagonistic active knee prosthesis. a metabolic cost of walking comparison with a variable-damping prosthetic knee. In: 2011 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, EMBC. IEEE, pp 8519–8522
Meyer PF, Oddsson LIE, Lucca CJD (2004) The role of plantar cutaneous sensation in unperturbed stance. Exp Brain Res 156:505–512
Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe AB (2002) Balance confidence among people with lower-limb amputations. Phys Ther 82:856–865
Nolan L, Wit A, Dudziñski K, Lees A, Lake M, Wychowañski M (2003) Adjustments in gait symmetry with walking speed in trans-femoral and trans-tibial amputees. Gait Posture 17(2):142
Pagel A, Oes J, Pfeifer S, Riener R, Vallery H (2013) Künstliches Feedback für Oberschenkelamputierte-Theoretische Analyse/Artificial feedback for transfemoral amputees-Theoretical analysis. at-Automatisierungstechnik 61(9):621–629
Pfeifer S, Caldiran O, Vallery H, Riener R, Arieta AH (2010) Displaying centre of pressure location by electrotactile stimulation using phantom sensation. In: Proceedings of the 2010 15th annual conference of the international functional electrical stimulation society, pp 1–3
Prieto TE, Myklebust JB, Hoffmann RG, Lovett EG, Myklebust BM (1996) Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43:956–966
Pylatiuk C, Kargov A, Schulz S (2006) Design and evaluation of a low-cost force feedback system for myoelectric prosthetic hands. J Prosthet Orthot 18(2):57–61
Ramdani S, Seigle B, Lagardea J, Boucharab F, Bernarda PL (2009) On the use of sample entropy to analyze human postural sway data. Med Eng Phys 31:1023–1031
Roerdink M, Geurts ACH, de Haart M, Beek PJ (2009) On the relative contribution of the paretic leg to the control of posture after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repai 23:267–274
Sabolich JA, Ortega GM (1994) Sense of feel for lower-limb amputees: a phase-one study. J Prosthet Orthot 6:36–41
Seps M, Dermitzakis K, Arieta AH (2011) Study on lower back electrotactile stimulation characteristics for prosthetic sensory feedback. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS). IEEE, pp 3454–3459
Stepp CE, An Q, Matsuoka Y (2012) Repeated training with augmentative vibrotactile feedback increases object manipulation performance. PLoS One 7(2):e32,743
Sup F, Varol H, Mitchell J, Withrow T, Goldfarb M (2009) Self-contained powered knee and ankle prosthesis: initial evaluation on a transfemoral amputee. In: 2009 IEEE 11th international conference on rehabilitation robotics
Tschupp G, Vallery H, Riener R, Schanze T, Pagel A (2013) Sensor for artificial feedback in lower limb exoprostheses. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ISPO world congress, p 1
Varol HA, Sup F, Goldfarb M (2010) Multiclass real-time intent recognition of a powered lower limb prosthesis. IEEE T Biomed Eng 57(3):542–551
Vrieling A, van Keeken H, Schoppen T, Otten E, Hof A, Halbertsma J, Postema K (2008) Balance control on a moving platform in unilateral lower limb amputees. Gait Posture 28:222–228
Webb G, Ewins D, Ghoussayni S (2012) Electro-tactile sensation thresholds for an amputee gait-retraining system. In: 3rd annual conference of the international functional electrical stimulation society
Wiener N et al (1948) Cybernetics. Wiley, New York
Yang L, Dyer P, Carson R, Webster J, Foreman KB, Bamberg S (2012) Utilization of a lower extremity ambulatory feedback system to reduce gait asymmetry in transtibial amputation gait. Gait Posture 36:631–634
Zambarbieri D, Schmid M, Verni G (2001) Sensory feedback for lower limb prostheses. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation through the National Centre of Competence in Research Robotics, by the Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung, by an ETH research grant, and by the Marie-Curie career integration Grant PCIG13-GA-2013-618899. The authors would like to thank S. Bühler for her support during the experiments, G. Tschupp and the team of BalgristTec for providing their technical expertise, and the subjects who participated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pagel, A., Arieta, A.H., Riener, R. et al. Effects of sensory augmentation on postural control and gait symmetry of transfemoral amputees: a case description. Med Biol Eng Comput 54, 1579–1589 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1432-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1432-2