Skip to main content
Log in

Multichannel search strategy for improving the detection of auditory steady-state response

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Auditory steady-state response (ASSR) is useful for hearing threshold estimation. The ASSR is usually detected with objective response detectors (ORD). The performance of these detectors depends on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as well as the signal length. Since it is undesirable to increase the signal length, then, this work provides a multivariate technique for improving the SNR and consequently the detection power. We propose the insertion of a short calibration step before the detection protocol, in order to perform a search among the available electroencephalogram (EEG) derivations and select the derivation with the highest SNR. The ORD used in this work was the magnitude-squared coherence (MSC). The standard detection protocol is to use the same EEG derivation in all exams. Using 22-scalp positions, the new technique achieved a detection rate higher than that obtained in 99.13% of the standard detection protocol. When restrictions were applied to the search, a superior performance was achieved. Thus, the technique proposed was able to track the best EEG derivations before exams and seems to be able to deal with the variability between individuals and between sessions.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Picton TW, John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Purcell D (2003) Human auditory steady-state responses: respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos. Int J Audiol 42(4):177–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Reijden CS, Mens LH, Snik AF (2004) Signal-to-noise ratios of the auditory steady-state response from fifty-five EEG derivations in adults. J Am Acad Audiol 15(10):692–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Reijden CS, Mens LH, Snik AF (2005) EEG derivations providing auditory steady-state responses with high signal-to-noise ratios in infants. Ear Hear 26(3):299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilding T, McKay C, Baker R, Kluk K (2012) Auditory steady state responses in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults: an analysis of between-session amplitude and latency repeatability, test time, and F ratio detection paradigms. Ear Hear 33(2):267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimitrijevic A, John SM, Van Roon P, Purcell DW, Adamonis J, Ostroff J, Picton TW (2002) Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 13(4):205–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Maanen A, Stapells DR (2005) Comparison of multiple Auditory Steady-State Responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults: comparación de las respuestas auditivas múltiples de estado estable (80 vs 40 Hz) y de los potenciales corticales lentos en la estimación de umbrales en adultos con hipoacusia. Int J Audiol 44(11):613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hatzopoulos S, Prosser S, Ciorba A, Giarbini N, Kochanek K, Sliwa L et al (2009) Threshold estimation in adult normal-and impaired-hearing subjects using auditory steady-state responses. Med Sci Monit 16(1):CR21–CR27

    Google Scholar 

  8. D’Haenens W, Vinck BM, Maes L, Bockstael A, Keppler H, Philips B, Dhooge I (2010) Determination and evaluation of clinically efficient stopping criteria for the multiple auditory steady-state response technique. Clin Neurophysiol 121(8):1267–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosner T, Kandzia F, Oswald JA, Janssen T (2011) Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses. J Acoust Soc Am 129(2):840–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hatzopoulos S, Petruccelli J, Œliwa L, Jędrzejczak WW, Kochanek K, Skarżyński H (2012) Hearing threshold prediction with auditory steady state responses and estimation of correction functions to compensate for differences with behavioral data, in adult subjects: part 1: Audera and CHARTR EP devices. Med Sci Monit 18(7):MT47–MT53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mühler R, Mentzel K, Verhey J (2012) Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns. Sci World J 2012:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Attias J, Karawani H, Shemesh R, Nageris B (2014) Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses. Ear Hear 35(3):330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee MY, Ahn SY, Lee HJ, Jung JY, Rhee CK, Suh MW (2016) Narrow band CE-Chirp auditory steady-state response is more reliable than the conventional ASSR in predicting the behavioral hearing threshold. Auris Nasus Larynx 43(3):259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bakhos D, Vitaux H, Villeneuve A, Kim S, Lescanne E, Pigeon V, Galvin J (2016) The effect of the transducers on paediatric thresholds estimated with auditory steady-state responses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(8):2019–2026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Casey KA, Small SA (2014) Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing. Ear Hear 35(4):423–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hosseinabadi R, Jafarzadeh S (2015) Auditory steady-state response thresholds in adults with conductive and mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Iran Red Crescent Med J 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.18029.

  17. Israelsson KE, Bogo R, Berninger E (2015) Reliability in hearing threshold prediction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired participants using mixed multiple ASSR. J Am Acad Audiol 26(3):299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sardari S, Jafari Z, Haghani H, Talebi H (2015) Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds. Hear Res 330:134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Seidel DU, Flemming TA, Park JJH, Remmert S (2015) Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns: implementation in clinical routine. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(1):51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zakaria MN, Jalaei B, Wahab NAA (2016) Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(2):349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maeda H, Tamashige E, Iwasaki N, Urano D, Kanazawa A (2017) Evaluation of hearing sensitivity in young adults with normal hearing using a 40-hz auditory steady-state response with CE-Chirp. Am J Audiol 26(2):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Herdman AT, Lins O, Van Roon P, Stapells DR, Scherg M, Picton TW (2002) Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr 15(2):69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Sá AM, Infantosi AFC, Simpson DM (2002) Coherence between one random and one periodic signal for measuring the strength of responses in the electro-encephalogram during sensory stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 40(1):99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Felix LB, Antunes F, da Silva Carvalho JA, dos Santos Barroso MF (2018) Comparison of univariate and multivariate magnitude-squared coherences in the detection of human 40-Hz auditory steady-state evoked responses. Biomed Signal Process Control 40:234–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eloi BFS, Antunes F, Felix LB (2018) Improving the detection of auditory steady-state responses near 80 Hz using multiple magnitude-squared coherence and multichannel electroencephalogram. Biomed Signal Process Control 42:158–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Silva GM, Antunes F, Henrique CS, Felix LB (2018) Assessment of auditory threshold using multiple magnitude-squared coherence and amplitude modulated tones monaural stimulation around 40 Hz. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 159:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dobie RA, Wilson MJ (1989) Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. Ear Hear 10(1):2–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Miranda de Sá AMFL (2006) A note on the coherence-based signal-to-noise ratio estimation in systems with periodic inputs. J Franklin Inst 343(7):688–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xi J, Chicharo JF (1996) A new algorithm for improving the accuracy of periodic signal analysis. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 45(4):827–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miranda de Sá AMFL, Infantosi AFC (2002) A coherence-based technique for evaluating the degree of synchronism in the EEG during sensory stimulation. Rev Bras Eng Biomed 18:39–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Brazilian Agencies: CNPq, FAPEMIG, and CAPES. It was also in part developed in the University of Southampton.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felipe Antunes.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This work is approved by the Local Ethics Committee. (UFV/ CAAE: 56346916.4.0000.5153).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antunes, F., Zanotelli, T., Simpson, D.M. et al. Multichannel search strategy for improving the detection of auditory steady-state response. Med Biol Eng Comput 59, 391–399 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02323-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02323-z

Keywords

Navigation