Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Automatic Cobb angle measurement method based on vertebra segmentation by deep learning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accuracy of the Cobb measurement is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of scoliosis. Manual measurement is however influenced by the observer variability hence affecting progression evaluation. In this paper, we propose a fully automatic Cobb measurement method to address the accuracy issue of manual measurement. We improve the U-shaped network based on the multi-scale feature fusion to segment each vertebra. To enable multi-scale feature extraction, the convolution kernel of the U-shaped network is substituted by the Inception Block. To solve the problem of gradient disappearance caused by the widening of the network structure from the Inception Block, we propose using Res Block. CBAM (Convolutional Block Attention Module) can help the network judges the importance of the feature map to modify learning weight. Also, to further enhance the accuracy of feature extraction, we add the CBAM to the U-shaped network bottleneck. Finally, based on the segmented vertebrae, the efficient automatic Cobb angle measurement method is proposed to estimate the Cobb angle. In the experiments, 75 spinal X-ray images are tested. We compare the proposed U-Shaped network with the state-of-the-art methods including DeepLabV3 + , FCN8S, SegNet, U-Net, U-Net +  + , BASNet, and U2Net for vertebra segmentation. Our results show that compared to these methods, the Dice coefficient is improved by 32.03%, 33.58%, 12.42%, 5.65%, 4.55%, 4.42%, and 3.27%, respectively. The CMAE of the calculated Cobb measurement is 2.45°, which is lower than the average error of 5–7° of manual measurement. The experimental results indicate that the improved U-shaped network improves the accuracy of vertebra segmentation. The proposed efficient automatic Cobb measurement method can be used in clinics to reduce observer variability.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hefti F et al (2013) Pathogenesis and biomechanics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). J Children’s Orthop 7(1):17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Little JP, Izatt MT, Labrom RD et al (2013) An FE investigation simulating intra-operative corrective forces applied to correct scoliosis deformity. Scoliosis 8(1):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cobb JR (1947) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instruct Course Lect 5

  4. Asher MA, Burton DC (2006) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 1(1):2–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JCY et al (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371(9623):1527–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vrtovec T, Pernu F, Likar B (2009) A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J 18(5):593–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pruijs JEH, Hageman MAPE, Keessen W et al (1994) Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skelet Radiol 23(7):517–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu H et al (2017) Automatic landmark estimation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis assessment using BoostNet. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention Springer, Cham

  9. Wu H, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P et al (2018) Automated comprehensive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis assessment using MVC-Net. Med Image Anal 48:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lw A et al (2019) Accurate automated Cobb angles estimation using multi-view extrapolation net. Med Image Anal 58:101542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fu X et al (2020) An automated estimator for Cobb angle measurement using multi-task networks. Neural Comput Appl 1–7

  12. Zhang J, Lou E, Hill DL et al (2010) Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs. Med Biol Eng Comput 48(2):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang J, Lou E, Le LH et al (2009) Automatic Cobb measurement of scoliosis based on fuzzy hough transform with vertebral shape prior. J Digit Imaging 22(5):463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sardjono TA, Wilkinson MHF, Veldhuizen AG et al (2013) Automatic Cobb angle determination from radiographic images. Spine 38(20):1256–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anitha H, Karunakar AK, Dinesh KVN (2014) Automatic extraction of vertebral endplates from scoliotic radiographs using customized filter. Biomed Eng Lett 4(2):158–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T (2015) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 3431–3440

  17. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, 234–241

  18. Zhou Z, Siddiquee MMR, Tajbakhsh N et al (2018) Unet++: a nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation. Deep learning in medical image analysis and multimodal learning for clinical decision support. Springer, Cham, p 3–11

  19. Zhou Z et al (2020) UNet++: redesigning skip connections to exploit multiscale features in image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39(6):1856–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qin X et al (2019) BASNet: boundary-aware salient object detection. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE

  21. Qin X et al (2020) U2-Net: going deeper with nested U-structure for salient object detection. Pattern Recognit 106:107404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fang L, Liu J, Liu J, et al (2018) Automatic segmentation and 3D reconstruction of spine based on FCN and marching cubes in CT volumes. 2018 10th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control (ICMIC), IEEE. 1–5

  23. Horng MH, Kuok CP, Fu MJ et al (2019) Cobb angle measurement of spine from X-ray images using convolutional neural network. Comput Math Methods Med

  24. Tan Z, Yang K, Sun Y et al (2018) An automatic scoliosis diagnosis and measurement system based on deep learning. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), IEEE, p 439–443

  25. Wang L et al (2021) Evaluation and comparison of accurate automated spinal curvature estimation algorithms with spinal anterior-posterior X-ray images: the AASCE2019 challenge. Med Image Anal 72(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lei T et al (2020) Medical image segmentation using deep learning: a survey

  27. Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V et al (2017) Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  28. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, p 770–778

  29. He K, Zhang X, Ren S et al (2016) Identity mappings in deep residual networks. European conference on computer vision, Springer, Cham, p 630–645

  30. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G (2018) Squeeze-and-excitation networks. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, p 7132–7141

  31. Woo S, Park J, Lee J Y, et al (2018) CBAM: convolutional block attention module. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 3–19

  32. Chen L C, Zhu Y, Papandreou G, et al., “Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation,” Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). 801–818 (2018).

  33. Badrinarayanan V, Kendall A, Cipolla R (2017) SegNet: a deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence. 1–1

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62063034). The authors would like to express their gratitude to EditSprings (https://www.editsprings.cn/) for the expert linguistic services provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information, Yunnan University, East outer ring south road, Kunming, 650504, China

    Yang Zhao, Junhua Zhang, Xiaoying Gu, Zonggui Li & Shuai Zhang

  2. Orthopedics Department, Yunnan Provincial People’s Hospital: First People’s Hospital of Yunnan, 157 Jinbi Road, Kunming, 650034, China

    Hongjian Li

Authors
  1. Yang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junhua Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongjian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoying Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zonggui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shuai Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junhua Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Li, H. et al. Automatic Cobb angle measurement method based on vertebra segmentation by deep learning. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 2257–2269 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02563-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02563-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation