Skip to main content
Log in

Management of cranial and craniofacial bone defects with prefabricated individual titanium implants: follow-up and evaluation of 166 patients with 169 titanium implants from 1994 to 2000

  • Original article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective The TICC (Tomography, Image processing, CAD, CAM) processing chain developed at the Ruhr-University Bochum in Germany has already been established since several years for the reconstruction of large pre-existing posttraumatic skull defects with individual prefabricated implants made of pure titanium. So far, more than 500 titanium implants have been inserted with great success at more than 60 clinical centres worldwide. The aim of our study was to evaluate all implants inserted between 1994 and 2000.

Materials and Methods The study describes the clinical experience with 166 patients receiving 169 skull implants between 1994 and 2000. All 169 implants were measured and categorized in the CAD system in terms of size and anatomical localization. The surgical and radiological reports of the patients were evaluated. Sixty patients operated at the university hospital in Bochum and nearby were clinically reviewed describing scars, position of the implants and cosmetic results. Questionnaires of 131 patients were analyzed regarding the postoperative quality of life distinctly.

Results The study shows constantly good to excellent results intraoperatively as well as postoperatively regarding complications, fit of the implants and the clinical follow-up. In particular the enquiry of the patients shows that titanium skull implants improve quality of life.

Conclusion High precision and easy handling as well as a low complication rate and the high contentedness of the patients make the individual titanium skull implants valuable for cranioplasty, especially in complicated applications with very large defects, multiple previous operations and additional irradiations. Even in these difficult cases predictable results are possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blake GB, MacFarlane MR, Hinton JW (1990) Titanium in reconstructive surgery of the skull and face. Br J Plast Surg 43:528–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bucheler M, Weihe S, Eufinger H, Wehmoller M, Bootz F (2002) Reconstruction of the frontal bone with individual titanium implants after surgical therapy of osteomyelitis of the frontal bone [German]. HNO 50:339–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Costantino PD, Hiltzik D, Govindaraj S, Moche J (2002) Bone healing and bone substitutes. Facial Plast Surg 18:13–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Costantino PD, Chaplin JM, Wolpoe ME, Catalano PJ, Sen C, Bederson JB, Govindaraj S (2000) Applications of fast-setting hydroxyapatite cement: cranioplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:409–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dujovny M, Agner C, Aviles A (1999) Syndrome of the trephined: theory and facts. Critical Reviews in Neurosurgery 9:271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dujovny M, Aviles A, Agner C, Fernandez P, Charbel FT (1997) Cranioplasty: cosmetic or therapeutic? Surg Neurol 47:238–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eufinger H, Wehmoller M (1998) Individual prefabricated titanium implants in reconstructive craniofacial surgery: clinical and technical aspects of the first 22 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:300–308

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eufinger H, Wehmoller M (2002) Microsurgical tissue transfer and individual computer-aided designed and manufactured prefabricated titanium implants for complex craniofacial reconstruction. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 36:326–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eufinger H, Wehmoller M, Machtens E (1997) Individual prostheses and resection templates for mandibular resection and reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:413–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eufinger H, Wittkampf AR, Wehmoller M, Zonneveld FW (1998) Single-step fronto-orbital resection and reconstruction with individual resection template and corresponding titanium implant: a new method of computer-aided surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26:373–378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eufinger H, Wehmoller M, Scholz M, Harders A, Machtens E (1999) Reconstruction of an extreme frontal and frontobasal defect by microvascular tissue transfer and a prefabricated titanium implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:198–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eufinger H, Wehmoller M, Muller C, Falk A, Machtens E (2000) Pure titanium as bone substitute. Geometric and substance-specific aspects of computer-assisted fabrication and follow-up imaging [German]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 4 (Suppl 2):504–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gladstone HB, McDermott MW, Cooke DD (1995) Implants for cranioplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 28:381–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gliese M, Handel G, Brawanski A (2000) A simple and cosmetically ideal method large cranioplasty [German]. Zentralbl Neurochir 61:155–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Govindaraj S, Costantino PD, Friedman CD (1999) Current use of bone substitutes in maxillofacial surgery. Facial Plast Surg 15:73–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamyszek T, Eufinger H, Wehmoller M, Scholz M, Machtens E (2000) Reconstruction of cranial and craniofacial skull defects with individual CAD/CAM-prefabricated titanium implants—clinical and radiological experience with 76 patients treated at 19 centres from 1994 to 1998: In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG, Doi K (eds): CARS 2000—computer assisted radiology and surgery. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 875–880

  17. Liao CC, Kao MC (2002) Cranioplasty for patients with severe depressed skull bone defect after cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Clin Neurosci 9:553–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Luparello D, Bruschi S, Verna G, Bogetti P, Datta G, Fraccalvieri M, Luparello V (1998) Cranioplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. The clinico-statistical considerations [Italian]. Minerva Chir 53:575–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pompili A, Caroli F, Carpanese L, Caterino M, Raus L, Sestili G, Occhipinti E (1998) Cranioplasty performed with a new osteoconductive osteoinducing hydroxyapatite-derived material. J Neurosurg 89:236–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schaller B, Graf R, Sanada Y, Rosner G, Wienhard K, Heiss WD (2003) Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of decompressive hemicraniectomy in normal brain. An experimental PET-study in cats. Brain Res 982:31–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schiller C, Rasche C, Wehmoller M, Beckmann F, Eufinger H, Epple M, Weihe S (2004) Geometrically structured implants for cranial reconstruction made of biodegradable polyesters and calcium phosphate/calcium carbonate. Biomaterials 25:1239–1247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwab S, Erbguth F, Aschoff A, Orberk E, Spranger M, Hacke W (1998) “Paradoxical” herniation after decompressive trephining [German]. Nervenarzt 69:896–900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stula D, Muller HR (1980) Cranioplasty after extensive decompressive craniotomy with displacement of the cerebral hemisphere. CA analysis [German]. Neurochirurgia 23: 41–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Weihe S, Wehmoller M, Schliephake H, Hassfeld S, Tschakaloff A, Raczkowsky J, Eufinger H (2000) Synthesis of CAD/CAM, robotics and biomaterial implant fabrication: single-step reconstruction in computer-aided frontotemporal bone resection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:384–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Weihe S, Wehmoller M, Tschakaloff A, von Oepen R, Schiller C, Epple M, Eufinger H (2001) Alternative bone replacement substances for preoperative design of individual CAD/CAM skull implants [German]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 5:299–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitaker RA (1982) Environmental effects on the life of bone-plate-type surgical implants. Rev Environ Health 4: 63–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang XJ, Hong GL, Su SB, Yang SY (2003) Complications induced by decompressive craniectomies after traumatic brain injury. Chin J Traumatol 6:99–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harald Eufinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eufinger, H., Weihe, S., Scherer, P. et al. Management of cranial and craniofacial bone defects with prefabricated individual titanium implants: follow-up and evaluation of 166 patients with 169 titanium implants from 1994 to 2000. Int J CARS 1, 197–203 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-006-0054-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-006-0054-4

Keywords

Navigation