Abstract
Objective
We propose a simultaneous extraction method for 12 organs from non-contrast three-dimensional abdominal CT images.
Materials and methods
The proposed method uses an abdominal cavity standardization process and atlas guided segmentation incorporating parameter estimation with the EM algorithm to deal with the large fluctuations in the feature distribution parameters between subjects. Segmentation is then performed using multiple level sets, which minimize the energy function that considers the hierarchy and exclusiveness between organs as well as uniformity of grey values in organs. To assess the performance of the proposed method, ten non-contrast 3D CT volumes were used.
Results
The accuracy of the feature distribution parameter estimation was slightly improved using the proposed EM method, resulting in better performance of the segmentation process. Nine organs out of twelve were statistically improved compared with the results without the proposed parameter estimation process. The proposed multiple level sets also boosted the performance of the segmentation by 7.2 points on average compared with the atlas guided segmentation. Nine out of twelve organs were confirmed to be statistically improved compared with the atlas guided method.
Conclusion
The proposed method was statistically proved to have better performance in the segmentation of 3D CT volumes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- MAP:
-
Maximum a posteriori
- CAD:
-
Computer-assisted diagnosis
- EM:
-
Expectation maximization
- LSM:
-
Level set method
- 3D:
-
Three-dimensional
- IVC:
-
Inferior vena cava
- PV:
-
Portal vein
References
Kobatake H (2007). Future CAD in multi-dimensional medical images - project on multi-organ, multi-disease CAD system -. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31(4–5): 258–266
Park H, Bland PH and Meyer CR (2003). Construction of an abdominal probabilistic atlas its application in segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(4): 483–492
Yang J, Staib L and Duncan J (2004). Neighbor-constrained segmentation with level set based 3-D deformable models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(8): 940–948
Tsai A, Wells W and Tempany C (2003). Coupled multi-shape model and mutual information for medical image segmentation. Inf Process Med Imaging 18: 185–197
Yan P, Shen W, Kassim AA et al (2005) Segmentation of neighboring organs in medical image with model competition. In: Proceedings of MICCAI 2005, LNCS3749, pp 270–277
Maintz JBA and Viergever MA (1998). A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal 2: 1–36
PressWH, Flannery BP, TeukolskySAet al (1995) Numerical recipes in C, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Kluwer, London, Dordrecht, pp 412–420
Ghahramami Z, Jordan M (1995) Learning from incomplete data. Technical Report AI Lab Memo no. 1509, CBCL Paper no. 108, MIT AI Lab
Okumura T, Yamamoto S and Matsumoto M (1998). The lung region extraction in the chest CT images by the active cylinder model. Med Imaging Technol 16(1): 61–71
Chan TF and Vese LF (2001). Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(2): 266–277
Caselles V, Kimmel R and Sapiro G (1997). Geodesic active contours. Int J Comput Vis 22(1): 61–79
Yao C, Wada T and Shimizu A (2006). Probabilistic atlas-guided Eigen-organ method for simultaneous bounding box estimation of multiple organs in volumetric CT images. Med Imaging Technol 24(3): 191–200
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was originally presented at CARS 2006 and supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shimizu, A., Ohno, R., Ikegami, T. et al. Segmentation of multiple organs in non-contrast 3D abdominal CT images. Int J CARS 2, 135–142 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-007-0135-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-007-0135-z