Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An iterative Bayesian approach for nearly automatic liver segmentation: algorithm and validation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We present a new algorithm for nearly automatic liver segmentation and volume estimation from abdominal Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) images and its validation.

Materials and methods

Our hybrid algorithm uses a multiresolution iterative scheme. It starts from a single user-defined pixel seed inside the liver, and repeatedly applies smoothed Bayesian classification to identify the liver and other organs, followed by adaptive morphological operations and active contours refinement. We evaluate the algorithm with two retrospective studies on 56 validated CTA images. The first study compares it to ground-truth manual segmentation and semi-automatic and automatic commercial methods. The second study uses the public data-set SLIVER07 and its comparison methodology.

Results

We achieved for both studies, correlations of 0.98 and 0.99 for liver volume estimation, with mean volume differences of 5.36 and 2.68% with respect to manual ground-truth estimation, and mean volume variability for different initial seeds of 0.54 and 0.004%, respectively. For the second study, our algorithm scored 71.8 and 67.87 for the training and test datasets, which compares very favorably with other semi-automatic methods.

Conclusions

Our algorithm requires minimal interaction by a non-expert user, is accurate, efficient, and robust to initial seed selection. It can be effective for hepatic volume estimation and liver modeling in a clinical setup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okada T, Shimada R, Sato Y, Hori M, Yokota K, Nakamoto M, Chen Y, Nakamura H, Tamura S (2007) Automated segmentation of the liver from 3D CT images using probabilistic Atlas and multi-level statistical shape model. In: Proc of the 10th int conf on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI’07). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4791. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 86–93

  2. Heimann T, Wolf I, Meinzer HP (2006) Active shape models for a fully automated 3d segmentation of the liver—an evaluation on clinical data. In: Proc of the 9th int conf on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI’06). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4191. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 41–48

  3. Lamecker H, Lange T, Seebass M (2002) A statistical shape model for the liver. In: Proc of the 5th int conf on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI’02). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2489. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 421–427

  4. Pohle R, Toennies K (2001) Segmentation of medical images using adaptive region growing. In: Sonka M, Hanson KM (eds) SPIE medical imaging, vol 4322, pp 1337–1346

  5. Nakayama Y, Li Q, Katsuragawa S, Ikeda R, Hiai Y, Awai K, Kusunoki S, Yamashita Y, Okajima H, Inomata Y, Doi K (2006) Automated hepatic volumetry for living related liver transplantation at multisection CT. Radiology 240(3): 743–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan S, Dawant M (2001) Automatic 3D segmentation of the liver from abdominal ct images: a level-set approach. In: Sonka M, Hanson KM (eds) SPIE medical imaging, vol 4322, pp 128–138

  7. Schenk A, Prause GPM, Peitgen HO (2000) Efficient semiautomatic segmentation of 3d objects in medical images. In: Proc of the 3rd int conf on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI’00). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1935. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 186–195

  8. Lambrou T, Linney A, Todd-Pokropek A (2007) Wavelet analysis of the liver from CT datasets. In: Proc of the 21st int conf on computer assisted radiology and surgery (CARS’07). Springer, Heidelberg

  9. Sosna J, Berman P, Azraq Y, Libson E (2006) Automated liver segmentation and volume calculation from MDCT using a Bayesian likelihood maximization technique: comparison with manual tracing technique. In: 92nd Scientific assembly and annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA’06)

  10. Gao L, Heath DG, Kuszyk BS, Fishman EK (1996) Automatic liver segmentation technique for three-dimensional visualization of CT data. Radiology 201(2): 359–364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soler L, Delingette L, Malandain V, Montagnat J, Ayache N, Koehl C, Dourthe O, Malassagne B, Smith M, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2001) Fully automatic anatomical, pathological, and functional segmentation from CT scans for hepatic surgery. Comput Aided Surg 6(3): 131–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen T, Metaxas D (2005) A hybrid framework for 3d medical image segmentation. Med Image Anal 9(6): 547–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Teo P, Sapiro G, Wandell B (1997) Anisotropic smoothing of posterior probabilities. In: Proc of the 1997 int conf on image processing (ICIP’97)(3), pp 675–678

  14. Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 12(7): 629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G (1997) Geodesic active contours. Int J Comp Vis 22(1): 61–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibanez L, Schroeder W, Ng L, Cates J (2005) The ITK software guide, 2nd edn. Kitware, Inc., Clifton Park. http://www.itk.org/ItkSoftwareGuide.pdf

  17. Melonakos J, Krishnan K, Tannenbaum A (2006) An ITK filter for Bayesian segmentation: itkbayesianclassifierimagefilter. Insight J

  18. Ginneken B.V, Heimann T, Styner, M (2007) 3D Segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge. http://www.sliver07.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering and Computer Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram Campus, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel

    M. Freiman, O. Eliassaf, Y. Taieb & L. Joskowicz

  2. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

    Y. Azraq & J. Sosna

Authors
  1. M. Freiman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Eliassaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Taieb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. Joskowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Y. Azraq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Sosna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Freiman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freiman, M., Eliassaf, O., Taieb, Y. et al. An iterative Bayesian approach for nearly automatic liver segmentation: algorithm and validation. Int J CARS 3, 439–446 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0254-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0254-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation