Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A cost-sensitive extension of AdaBoost with markov random field priors for automated segmentation of breast tumors in ultrasonic images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A cost-sensitive extension of AdaBoost based on Markov random field (MRF) priors was developed to train an ensemble segmentation process which can avoid irregular shape, isolated points and holes, leading to lower error rate. The method was applied to breast tumor segmentation in ultrasonic images.

Methods

A cost function was introduced into the AdaBoost algorithm that penalizes dissimilar adjacent labels in MRF regularization. The extended AdaBoost algorithm generates a series of weak segmentation processes by sequentially selecting a process whose error rate weighted by the cost is minimum. The method was tested by generation of an ensemble segmentation process for breast tumors in ultrasonic images. This was followed by a active contour to refine the extracted tumor boundary.

Results

The segmentation performance was evaluated by tenfold cross validation test, where 300 carcinomas, 50 fibroadenomas, and 50 cysts were used. The experimental results revealed that the error rate of the proposed ensemble segmentation was two-thirds the error rate of the segmentation trained by AdaBoost without MRF. By combining the ensemble segmentation with a geodesic active contour, the average Jaccard index between the extracted tumors and the manually segmented true regions was 93.41%, significantly higher than the conventional segmentation process.

Conclusion

A cost-sensitive extension of AdaBoost based on MRF priors provides an efficient and accurate means for the segmentation of tumors in breast ultrasound images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shankar PM, Reid JM, Ortega H, Piccoli CW, Goldberg BB (1993) Use of non-Rayleigh statistics for the identification of tumors in ultrasonic B-scans of the breast. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 12(4): 687–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garra BS, Krasner BH, Horii SC, Ascher S, Mun SK, Zeman RK (1993) Improving the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesions: the value of sonographic texture analysis. Ultrason Imaging 15(4): 267–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC- 3(6): 610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weng L, Reid JM, Shankar PM, Soetanto K (1991) Ultrasound speckle analysis based on K-distribution. J Acoust Soc Am 89(6): 2992–2995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aleman-Flores M, Alvarez L, Caselles V (2007) Texture-oriented anisotropic filtering and geodesic active contours in breast tumor ultrasound segmentation. J Math Imaging 28: 81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G (1997) Geodesic active contour. Int J Comput Vision 22(1): 61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shimizu A, Narihira T, Furukawa D, Kobatake H, Nawano S, Shinozaki K (2008) Ensemble segmentation using AdaBoost with application to liver lesion extraction from a CT volume. Proceedings of workshop in MICCAI2008

  8. Niessen W, Walsum T, Schaap M et al (2008) 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge II. Proceedings of workshop in MICCAI2008, http://grand-challenge2008.bigr.nl/

  9. Freund Y, Schapire RE (1997) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55(1): 119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Besag J (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J Royal Statist Soc B 36(2): 192–236

    Google Scholar 

  11. Besag J (1986) On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. J Royal Statist Soc B 48(3): 259–302

    Google Scholar 

  12. Perez P (1998) Markov random fields and images. CWI-Quarterly 11(4): 413–437

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masnadi-Shirazi H, Vasconcelos N (2007) Asymmetric boosting. Proceedings of the 24th international conference on machine learning, pp 609–619

  14. Stan Z Li (2001) Markov random field modeling in image analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nishii R, Eguchi S (2005) Supervised image classification by contextual AdaBoost based on posteriors in neighborhoods. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 43(11): 2547–2554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Takemura A, Shimizu A, Hamamoto K (2010) Discrimination of breast tumors in ultrasonic images using an ensemble classifier based on the AdaBoost algorithm with feature selection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 29(3): 598–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perona P, Malik L (1990) Scale-spacing and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 12: 629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vettering WT, Flannery BP (2003) Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 683–688

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibanez L, Schroeder W, Ng L, Cates J. The ITK software guide, http://www.itk.org/, pp 550–555

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Takemura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takemura, A., Shimizu, A. & Hamamoto, K. A cost-sensitive extension of AdaBoost with markov random field priors for automated segmentation of breast tumors in ultrasonic images. Int J CARS 5, 537–547 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0411-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0411-1

Keywords

Navigation